RT @HotepJesus: “the real action is in the reaction of the opposition.” — Saul Alinsky
Be mindful of how you react to your enemy.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-22 20:06:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429535509588623361
RT @HotepJesus: “the real action is in the reaction of the opposition.” — Saul Alinsky
Be mindful of how you react to your enemy.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-22 20:06:39 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429535509588623361
The Youtube revenue gained from ‘explaining’ movies has caught on, and is being imitated, sometimes by what are clearly non-european script authors with poor language skills. That said the resulting search for content means movies overlooked are getting exposure they prev didn’t.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-22 20:06:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429535457264771072
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle @ThruTheHayes Exploitation is the opposite – a process of recursive ambiguation.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-22 15:02:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429458993194360837
In this sense the group of the right, that used social media to apply COGFEM GSRRM (Ridicule,Undermining) bred their own, and gave a forum to their own COGFEM = weak undesirable, ignorant,give-me-attention, unfit, males to demand their tribe victory at the cost of losing the war. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1429432946247798788
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-22 13:22:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429433680955596800
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1429432946247798788
16. So this is why we need markets for falsification of theories, claims, opinions and data. Even if we solve the problem (using P) of tests of consistency. The best we can hope to accomplish is self-awareness of these things the way science make us self aware of general rules.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 14:57:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095384861839368
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095383603548172
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
15. … that even if they master tests of consistency (p-law) they’re still limited by their ignorance of correspondence, their own motives, the author’s motives, and authors consistency and correspondence.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1429095383603548172
15. … that even if they master tests of consistency (p-law) they’re still limited by their ignorance of correspondence, their own motives, the author’s motives, and authors consistency and correspondence.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 14:57:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095383603548172
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095382404026368
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
14. So when the average person resonates with (finds an increase in understanding in) some theoretical(broad) structure or specific claim – they are stuck with a persistent (endless) problem …
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1429095382404026368
13. In P-Law (logic, science) we include motive, such that truth claims are claims of innocence of the crime of falsehood and deceit, warrantied by a promise of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit, and liability for the consequences of falsehood.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 14:57:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095381158277120
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095379967127554
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
12. This is the general problem faced by intellectually honest people. The broader problem faced by intellectually dishonest people, is rationality (motive).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1429095379967127554
12. This is the general problem faced by intellectually honest people. The broader problem faced by intellectually dishonest people, is rationality (motive).
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 14:57:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095379967127554
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429095378725580807
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
11. So, his theory is plausible at the degree of resolution I am capable of performing on the CORRESPONDENCE regardless of my capacity for high-resolution by consistency. So I am dependent upon others for the consistency of their arguments against correspondence.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1429095378725580807
RT @curtdoolittle: @EricLiford The false promise of freedom from the laws of nature will always be more successful than the truth of the la…
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 13:52:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429079056784535555
The false promise of freedom from the laws of nature will always be more successful than the truth of the laws of nature.
Source date (UTC): 2021-08-21 13:29:50 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429073257685266437
Reply addressees: @EricLiford
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1429057050743554051