All, Continuing the argument as to why Mises, Rothbard, Hoppe, and the MI group practice sophistry (pseudologic), pseudoscience, and pseudomathematics. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1457739296664920066 The libertarian community other than perhaps Hoppe isn’t even vaguely capable of holding this debate.
@Bohm_Baller @BobMurphyEcon @billyj41 OK. Since you’re intellectually dishonest I’ll handle this as a prosecution, rather than a discourse.
TERMS: https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1456679486330650624
JAE: Now,this is only the tip of the Jewish Austrian (Really the Pale of Settlement) attempt to appropriate logic and science into a monopoly authoritarian secular pseudoscientific theology, justifying Jewish Ethics of Diasporic (parasitic) peoples. (Which we see in Rothbard).
Again, I dunno why my criticisms are so sensitive to the community. I’m just saying it’s not money. And if it posed an y threat then it would be stopped
9) Abrahamism: Consists of undermining truth reason probability and evidence by use of False Promise, Baiting into Hazard, Pilpul (positive), Critique (negative), straw-manning, and heaping of undue praise, and propagation into social construction, to use suggestion and overloading to force individuals, groups, and polities, to appeal to your intuition rather than reason and evidence. it’s the same technique used by faith healers, priests, and con artists. And the higher a group’s trust the more susceptible they are to it.
TERMS: Grammar, Logic, Justification, Sophistry, Pilpul, Critique, Abrahamism 1) Grammar: (a) rules of “continuous recursive disambiguation” creating a contract for meaning, and consisting of: A Paradigm, consisting of: First Principles, Logic, Vocabulary, Syntax. (b) Grammars can be DeflationaryInflationary, where deflationary consists of math, logic, accounting, procedures, etc, and inflationary consist of stories, fictions, fictionalisms, deceits, and denials etc. (c) Operational grammar: operational grammar consists of complete sentences in promissory form, consisting of a sequence of subjectively testable operations producing complete transactions of changes in state. ie: ‘unambiguous measurements’. 2) Logic: the test of constant relations between properties reducible to analogy to experience, internally as identity, externally between premises and statements, or externally between statements. (a) all statements must consist of continuously recursive disambiguation (b) there is no closure other than tautology, (c) all non-tautological tests are falsificationary. (d) falsification requires tests: internal, external, operational, rational, reciprocal, completeness. 3) Truth: (a)Truth consists of a claim of innocence, by testimony sufficient for the satisfaction of demand for infallibility in the context. https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/04/24/truth-testimony-that-satisfies-demand-for-infallibility/ (b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary. (c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification. 4) Justification: either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false pretense that a proof is other than a possibility (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by the pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification. 5) Sophistry: (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist. (b) More specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to. 7) Pilpul: (attached) “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: (first image) 8) Critique: (attached) “The Negative Sell” (second and third images) (9) MORE IN COMMENTS….
1) Grammar: (a) rules of “continuous recursive disambiguation” creating a contract for meaning, and consisting of: A Paradigm, consisting of: First Principles, Logic, Vocabulary, Syntax.
(b) Grammars can be DeflationaryInflationary, where deflationary consists of math, logic, accounting, procedures, etc, and inflationary consist of stories, fictions, fictionalisms, deceits, and denials etc.
(c) Operational grammar: operational grammar consists of complete sentences in promissory form, consisting of a sequence of subjectively testable operations producing complete transactions of changes in state. ie: ‘unambiguous measurements’.
2) Logic: the test of constant relations between properties reducible to analogy to experience, internally as identity, externally between premises and statements, or externally between statements.
(a) all statements must consist of continuously recursive disambiguation (b) there is no closure other than tautology, (c) all non-tautological tests are falsificationary. (d) falsification requires tests: internal, external, operational, rational, reciprocal, completeness.
(b) Hierarchy of Decidability: Statements are undecidable, possibly true, or certainly false. All logic is Ternary.
(c) A proof provides a test of possibility: a justification. Truth must survive falsification.
4) Justification: either (a) a moral explanation for a claim of innocence (b) a false pretense that a proof is other than a possibility (c) and an evasion of the cost of falsification. (d) a fraud constructed by the pretense of due diligency by paying the cost of falsification.
5) Sophistry: (a) General: any use of loading, framing, suggestion, obscuring, conflating, inflating, fictionalism, or denial, to claim consistency in identity, internality, externality, operationality, rationality, reciprocity, or completeness that does not exist.
(b) More specifically, the use of the three means of fictionalism: Physical: Magic to Pseudoscience, Verbal: Sophistry to idealism (philosophy), Imaginary: Occult to Supernaturalism (theology), to convey a pretense of causality or knowledge that cannot be testified to.
7) Pilpul: (attached) “The Positive Sell” Sophistry that implies a false promise of freedom from formal, physical, natural, or evolutionary laws by use of the following methods: (first image)
8) Critique: (attached) “The Negative Sell” (second and third images)
That’s a rationalization though. Those are talking points that justify a satisfaction of a psychological demand. It’s like ‘non aggression principle’. A half truth. Soo I’m interested in the psychological demand. that’s the problem I’d like to cure
Yeah. The only issue I have is that fans are using ‘false promise, baiting into hazard’ by overstating their case. I’m just limiting the fantasy to reality. I’m not claiming that there is no utility or future for similar tech.
