Theme: Deception

  • “These people have been autists for over a thousand years”- Correct. hence the d

    -“These people have been autists for over a thousand years”-
    Correct. hence the difference between the west and the rest.
    It’s more that they weren’t taught lying by the middle east.
    Small variations in large numbers over long periods produce vast differences in consequences.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 23:03:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483575711206191107

    Reply addressees: @17cShyteposter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483320088715415552

  • So in your attempt to produce relativism by the deception that there is more tha

    So in your attempt to produce relativism by the deception that there is more than one most parsimonious consistent and correspondent metaphysics, you claim either a knowledge you don’t have or demonstrate an ignorance you don’t acknowledge.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 22:46:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483571534753116161

    Reply addressees: @Apollo33052943 @Jay_D007

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483569168620277761

  • (…) 6. There are only so many axis of self-delusion possible: (a) The physical

    (…)
    6. There are only so many axis of self-delusion possible:
    (a) The physical: Magic to Pseudoscience
    (b) The verbal: Sophistry to Idealism (philosophy, ideology)
    (c) The intuitionistic: Occult to Religion (Supernatural, Theology)
    (d) Avoidance, Evasion, and Denial (see HBD denial, genetic denial)
    (e) Blame and undermining (see marxism, neomarxism, feminism, postmodernism, pc-woke)
    (f) Social construction by Storytelling any or all of the above (environmental saturation, institutionalizing lying)
    (g) Hedonism: hyperconsumption, sex, alcohol, and drugs

    7. So, given the malincentives to reform in the academy, we must expect at least one generation to die off before we see reform in the evolutionary, behavioral, physical ,and logical sciences (despite some of us working very hard to bring it about.) 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 17:56:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107644753942786855

    Replying to: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107644751758704966


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtd

    Q: “How do you define The Existence Dilemma? Would the universe exist because it is a simulation and also because it is the opposite of a simulation? Could there be an infinite number of factors that make the universe exist?” It’s not a dilemma it’s a sophism. There are no paradoxes or dilemmas. (Really) Despite talking heads, there are no mysterious processes remaining in the universe. We merely lack means of measuring what is an exceptionless regularity in the universe, we call its first principle or cause: under pressure the quantum background (zero point) has only expansion (entropy-disorder) and aggregation (mass-order) available to release the stress. The universe is purely classical. “Mathiness” is a pseudoscience. (Mythology) Despite talking heads, in a universe under pressure the same competition for solutions to stress will manifest in predictable means. The only difference would be in velocity, frequency and amplitude of variations in the quantum background. In other words, only one optimum set of laws will emerge and they will produce an invariant outcome. Why? geometry limits orbitals (puzzle pieces), and orbitals determine potential connections. In other words, the universe is purely geometric at all levels, and there is only one solution that is survivable, but that solution will emerge in some form regardless of the initial state. Despite talking heads, we have no evidence of whether our observable universe is singular, whether it exists inside a greater macro universe, or whether our universe is but another bubble in a froth of multiple universes. However, we have no evidence or logic that suggests any other variation on this universe can exist. Everything suggests not. There is no knowledge yet by which we can predict which organization of universes: singular, container, or bubbles exist. The computational behavior of a universe cannot be simulated except as the universe itself. In other words we cannot be living in a simulation. Humans have an innate desire for discounts on the first principle of human behavior: acquisition(retention, consumption). This principle manifests as ‘the greatest return in the shortest time with the least effort, with the greatest certainty, at the lowest risk.’ This manifests in our bodily economy. In our neural economy. in our behavioral economy. in our social economy. in our political economy. In other words, we’re all looking for discounts. And some of us are looking for ‘cheats’. In other words, whether ideas, beliefs, ideologies, philosophies, religions, hyperconsumption, or drugs we seek to obtain discounts on existence ‘cheats’. One of those cheats is metaphysical. It is the equivalent of the hunter-gatherer imagining the undiscovered valley full of rivers, greenery and fresh game. And nothing more. (more…)

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107644751758704966

  • 2) A religion only requires a false promise of freedom from the laws of the univ

    2) A religion only requires a false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe in exchange for mindfulness (neural economy).
    http://naturallawinstitute.com/a-religion-doesnt-require-the-supernatural/
    (See my work on the abrahamic method of deceit for the technical means by which social construction of such deceits are made)


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 16:45:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483480797868867592

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1483480795239096323


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    James Lindsay’s most recent podcast (@ConceptualJames) reaches the point where he’s correctly positioning the Marxist to Woke tradition as a religion.
    1) Our graphic (below)
    2) Our definition of religion
    3) Where the supreme court failed b/c it lacked that definition.
    (more…) https://t.co/ERGc72QxNv

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1483480795239096323

  • THE PESSIMISM OF ECONOMISTS EXPLAINED The purpose of legal, financial, and econo

    THE PESSIMISM OF ECONOMISTS EXPLAINED

    The purpose of legal, financial, and economic advice, is to temper animal spirits by exposing risks so that those risks can be mitigated. By and large economists lawyers, financial professionals, and economists do not identify creative opportunities – only failures: poor laws, poor financial arrangments or utilizations, and unserved markets. So these three disciplines are empirical systesms that inform ‘creative’ invsetors, entrepreneurs, marketers, and managers on the avoidance of risks. It’s this equilibrium between the via positiva opportunists and the via negativa risk managers, that ‘calculates’ how organizations continue to survive. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 14:46:17 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107644005726040490

  • @Tayai Yes. The use of pilpul (sophistry) to produce critique (undermining)

    @Tayai Yes. The use of pilpul (sophistry) to produce critique (undermining)


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-18 02:47:58 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107641181176112125

  • @Valknot That’s not true. It’s a jewish narrative. Read what people really said

    @Valknot That’s not true. It’s a jewish narrative. Read what people really said and did. Sure the scotts irish were poor, uncultured, but the english, dutch and germans were not.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-17 01:23:45 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107635187776095931

  • SEX AND POLITICAL DIFFERENCES IN OPPRESSION NARRATIVE The oppression narrative o

    SEX AND POLITICAL DIFFERENCES IN OPPRESSION NARRATIVE

    The oppression narrative of the cognitive feminine left envisions a hostile dominant opposition. The conspiracy narrative of the cognitively male right, envisions hostile peers. They’re expressions of differences in sex cognitive bias, where we anthropomorphize natural processes.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-16 15:32:24 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107632862474603040

  • The oppression narrative of the cognitive feminine left envisions a hostile domi

    The oppression narrative of the cognitive feminine left envisions a hostile dominant opposition. The conspiracy narrative of the cognitively male right, envisions hostile peers. They’re expressions of differences in sex cognitive bias, where we anthropomorphize natural processes.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-16 15:31:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1482737312232611842

  • No. But I don’t want to play that game. My tolerance for the conservative versio

    No. But I don’t want to play that game. My tolerance for the conservative version of the oppression narrative is exhausted at the moment.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-01-15 13:49:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1482349126612398080

    Reply addressees: @hoeberian

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1482334749184212992