@psychosis67 You’re just piling on. I’m avoiding unnecessary detail that simply leads to opportunities for deception.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 13:09:25 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107700247956975044
Theme: Deception
-
@BrianCN No. The central method of abrahamic religion is superstition, false pro
@BrianCN No. The central method of abrahamic religion is superstition, false promse, and the institutionalization of sophistry and deceit, in order to rebel against the meritocracy and hierarchy and loyalty of indo-european aristocracy in which the ignornant superstitious underclass rapidly falls behind, by the increases in prosperity, that drive incdreases in inequality, for which individuals are themselvse responsible.
Christianity is just rebellion against the laws of nature and nature’s god:evolution.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 13:02:16 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107700219819614705
-
@JokerMoment It’s just truth. So more truth. Less of your lies, superstition, un
@JokerMoment It’s just truth. So more truth. Less of your lies, superstition, undermining, doxxing, canceling, appeasement, degeneracy. You can’t engage in the feminine and left tactics of saturating the discourse and poisoning the well without incurren retaliation for your crimes.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-28 12:56:46 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107700198190579393
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica Yes you did. You equated someone’s using GSRRM to
Yes you did. You equated someone’s using GSRRM to avoid the truth, to imiate the left, to undermine, doxx, and cancel (a crime) as with accusing someone of doing so (an accusation).
That’s either (a) lying by failure of due diligence, (b) lying by incompetence, or (c) lying by intent.
You don’t have to intend to lie. You have to produce a lie by failing to ensure you’re speaking the truth. Under law, intent has no meaning. You either commit a crime or you don’t. You committed a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:14:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696494568964494
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica You equated accusing someone of GSRRM to avoid th
@RavenMacLean@Teamsaveamerica You equated accusing someone of GSRRM to avoid the truth, to imiate the left, to undermine, doxx, and cancel as the same as the action.
That’s either (a) lying by failure of due diligence or (b)lying by intent.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 21:12:35 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696485522320740
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica That’s clearly false. I’m accusing you, and him,
@RavenMacLean@Teamsaveamerica That’s clearly false. I’m accusing you, and him, of lying, and GSSRM as a strategy. IT’s not false to or GSRRM to claim that a person using a method of lying is shaming. It’s called CRIME. I’m not using a moral claim. I’m using a CRIMINAL claim. That GSRRM, pilpul, critique, abrahamiism, and the female method of warfare is CRIMINAL – a violation of reciprocity. A Crime against the commons of information, norm, tradition, institution, that we depend upon for organizing under sovereignty and reciprocity.
Now I realize that you don’t comprehend the difference and so what to me is rather obviously your criminality, is a matter of a failure of due diligence, because you’re just ignorant, and indoctrinated into ignorance.
But the fact is the fact: AF-Groypers are fking cancerous criminals no better than the enemy, and as such are equally an enemy.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:31:48 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696325168650090
-
@RavenMacLean @Teamsaveamerica I”m speaking to the AF-Groyper moron-movement, th
@RavenMacLean@Teamsaveamerica I”m speaking to the AF-Groyper moron-movement, that uses the enemy’s tactics – when our purpose is to prohibit the enemy’s tactics.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:13:15 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696252241370563
-
AGAINST THE AF-GROYPER ENEMY OF OUR PEOPLE The Christians are right in result, b
AGAINST THE AF-GROYPER ENEMY OF OUR PEOPLE
The Christians are right in result, but wrong in using sophistry, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and the female method of undermining instead of argument, to produce that result. They teach one another to lie by the Abrahamic (female) means of lying: false promise (fraud), because fundamentalism requires social construction of falsehood (untestifiable unwarrantable reward) – just as marxism-pomo-woke promises reward after ‘whiteness’.
And the WN and NS aren’t wrong. They’re just unpleasant. Because the truth is unpleasant. That said they’re truthful. Because they’re just stating the truth, and the truth is the evidence, and the evidence is the science.
And the AF are wrong in using sophistry, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and the female method of undermining instead of argument, but also wrong in perversion, and wrong in ambition. In fact, the AF are just as evil as the enemy because they’re using the enemy’s strategy and tactics – including silencing, doxxing, and canceling. So what’s the difference between one Evil AF and another Evil Woke, if the whole problem is truth-evasion?
We’re trying to restore truth-before-face, reciprocity, rule of law, and science in everything. Because that is what ‘European’ means. Not the superstition of the peasantry who were but semi-domesticated animals. But the truth of the paternal aristocracy and their traditional law of sovereignty.
AF And WOKE are the same. They’re just f—king evil liars. So when the fundamentalists come after the AF, that’s just the mirror reflecting you.
The WN and the NS are the only truth-speakers working the field. And that’s only because the constitutionalists (empirical folks like me) have been overthrown by the combination of your lying, the Christians lying, and the WN/NS shouting threatening uncomfortable truths.
Fking idiots all.
“NO MORE LIES.” Including catholic, Christian fundamentalist, marxist-pc-woke. All of you are revolting against the Darwinian explanation for both existence and the evolutionary success of Europeans over the rest: we are the only people that discovered rule of law, by the natural law, by truth before face, duty before self, the primacy of law before force of faith, and the law of self-determination, by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrateed interest, and reciprocity in display word and deed, producing markets in all aspects of life, limiting us to voluntary cooperation, at the cost of the suppression of the reproduction of the unfit, that together alone are the only means of defeating both the red queen of evolutionary competition, and the entropy of the climate, planet, solar system, and universe.
There is only one law of god, and it is merciless and only the European aristocracy follows it: “Evolve or die”.
You are the enemy of nature and nature’s god, just as much as the woke are.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:08:52 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696234970143514
-
@JokerMoment The christians are right but wrong in using sophistry, supernatural
The christians are right but wrong in using sophistry, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and the female method of undermining instead of argument.
The WN and NS aren’t wrong. They’re just unpleasant. Because the truth is unpleasant. That said they’re truthful.
The AF are wrong in using sophistry, supernaturalism, fictionalism, and the female method of undermining instead of argument, but also wrong in perversion, and wrong in ambition. In fact, the AF are just as evil as the enemy because they’re using the enemy’s strategy and tactics – including silencing, doxxing and canceling. So what’s the difference between one Evil AF and another Evil Woke, if the whole problem is truth-evasion?
We’re trying to restore truth-before-face, reciprocity, rule of law, and science in everything.
AF And WOKE are the same. They’re just fking evil liars. So when the fundamentalists come after you, that’s just the mirror reflecting you.
The WN and the NS are the only truth-speakers working the field. And that’s only becuase the constitutionalists (folks like me) have been overthrown by the combination of your lying, the christians lying, and the WN/NS shouting threatening ucomfortable truths.
Fking idiots all.
“NO MORE LIES.” Including catholic, chrsitian fundamentalist, marxist-pc-woke. All of you are revolting against the darwinian explanation for both existence and the evolutionary success of europeans over the rest: we are the only people that discovered rule of law, by the natura law, by truth before face, duty before self, the primacy of law before force of faith, and the law of self determination, by self determined means, by reciprocial insurance of sovereignty in demonstrateed interest, and reciprocity in display word and deed, producing marrkets in all aspects of life, limiting us to voluntary cooperation, at the cost of the suppression of the reproduction of the unfit, that together alone are the only means of defeating both the red queen of evolutionary competition, and the entropy of the climate, planet, solar system, and universe.
There is only one law of god, and it is mercilous and only the european aristocracy follows it: “Evolve or die”.
You are the enemy of nature and nature’s god, just as much as the woke are.
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 20:05:37 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696222225177824
-
HOLOCAUST TRUTH Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were i
HOLOCAUST TRUTH
Does anyone really deny that the camps existed, that they were imitations of the Jewish bolshevik use of camps of Russia, or that the prisoners were put to work as forced labor, or that by the end of the war the prisoners were starved to death or murdered in large numbers because the state decided no longer to pay for their maintenance and care?
As far as I know the only debate is over whether the jews were practicing corruption by the usurpation of institutions of cultural production (as they had repeatedly elsewhere), whether the numbers of dead were dramatized, whether or not there was use of gas chambers, whether the original intent was relocation or extermination, and that the natural economics of any such program by a country losing a war would be to maximize resources directed to the people and military rather than ‘undesirables’, resulting in the camps we saw at the end of the war.
In other words, who is being honest or dishonest? what is the truth. The truth is rather obvious from the evidence. The untruth is rather obvious from t he evidence, and the motivated reasoning, and motivated propaganda. AFAIK every objector is just demanding the truth. (And yes, there may be some fking crazies who deny it all, just as there are crazies that fictionalize it all. )
As far as I can tell when the postwar generation has died off, which will occur shortly, the public understanding will adjust to the evidence, and the evidence is pretty clear that camps were created with the intent of relocation, that the war caused need for slave labor, then drove deprivation, starvation, and killings. That smaller numbers died than claimed. That postwar propaganda was used for political purposes. That the Germans were organizing to prevent the expansion of Jewish bolshevism from Russia into Germany (and anglo liberalism as well). That the postwar jewish marxists moved from germany to the usa and converted from class warfare that caused russian and german conflict, to race warfare that caused broader european and american social conflict. As such, there was no different intention of a purge of the jews this time than any other, or any different from the exit of the Moors from Spain, and that the original rather optimistic nature of the camps degenerated as the war pressed on for rather ordinary reasons that would occur and have occurred in history as resources are depleted.
As far as I know, that’s the empirical evidence, and it’s all rational, it’s not dramatic, or especially ‘evil’ at all. It’s nothing compared to the Albegentsian crusades, the Inquisition, or even the protestant use of claims of witchcraft as a proxy for continuing the dominance of Protestantism over catholicism and other ‘heretics’.
( continued in comments … )
Source date (UTC): 2022-01-27 19:44:14 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107696138112274496