@Juicedavis keeps avoiding the distinction between the content stated, and the means of argument used to convey the content. The question is, why does marx need to invert the Hegelian technique in order to get away with his fraud, when at least to the reader who has experience with managing people in this world, that Marx is an ass clown.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 16:03:40 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627700522617565185
I’m not the one sperging over the content. I’m writing the science and law that prevents the use of the various methods of deception in law, legislation, regulation, and policy – and hopefully such that we can prosecute these false religions that use female, abrahamic, platonic, hegelian, marxist, method of deception and fraud that promise freedom after death, after reason, after capitalism, after whiteness, after white people, and remove it from academy media and state.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:59:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627699365631361026
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627697999576195074
The continental, platonic, literary method allows loading, framing, obscuring, idealizing, conflating, and inflating.
This makes it easier to insert value judgments into an argument or explanation or narrative. German language is psychological, not legalistic, and uses constructed not appropriated terms. The germanic revolt against empiricism was an attempt via kant to create the equivalent of faith by reason. So continental philosophy is closer to scripture than legal testimony. And psychological rather than evidentiary. So it’s an easier ‘sell’. Becaue the reader is reinforced along the way rather than laboring until the end to determine whether something is true and good or false and bad.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:56:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627698630311256066
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627694974451212289
Again. Missing the point that Hegel taught the Marxists, like Plato taught the Jews how to reform Semitic pilpul and critique into as aggressive a means of deception as Socrates and Plato an aggressive means of speaking the truth.
Hegel taught the Jews how to modernize lying.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:49:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627696836910759938
Reply addressees: @juicedavisx @henry4glendale @Imperius__13 @TheTigerBringer @carbonbasedcat @elonmusk
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627694974451212289
Again, and I know this is a hurdle, you can communicate ideas through theology or mythologically, through philosophy or sophistry, thru pilpul and critique or essay and analysis, thru magic or pseudoscience through literature or history, through science and constructive logic, or any combination thereof.
The question is only which of those vehicles increases or decreases the opportunity for falsehood, suggestion, deceit, and fraud.
Unfortunately to reach computation (the use of science, testimony and logic to produce an operational means of communication) requires great knowledge, while every other method requires less and less, and relies more and more on analogy, suggestion, and pretense of knowledge.
So the method of teaching while it may allow greater suggestion to a broader audience will also allow deception.
CRT consists of abrahamic pilpul and critique, which seeks only consensus the way idealsm and sophistry seek some sort of truth upon which we can agree. Furthermore while idealism and sophistry in the western tradition generally favor advocacy of something openly stated (Male means of manipulation), pilpul and critique seek to undermine what is, to bring about something else entirely, indirectly (female means of manipulation)/
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:46:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627696325658566657
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627691595335368706
I know.
Hermes’ cart of lies broke down in the middle east and all the lies were stolen from it. Why?
There is a reason for the Abrahamic theological method of deceit, and its reformation in the Marxist-Sequence pseudoscientific method of deceit, and the use of pilpul and critique in advocacy and defense of deceit.
And that is the reason for the low trust, absence of truth before face, and the near absence of scientific, technical, economic, and political innovaton in the middle east – and the diaspora – until integrated into the west, which they struggle to undermine.
Why do they feel superior in ethics and morality despite the evidence of their absence of truth and cooperation and industry, polity, and institution that results?
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:19:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627689320185270273
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627663032196235264
Hegel, like Plato who he imitates, uses mystery pseudoscience as a carrier for what he teaches. While there is value in what he teaches, the criticism levied is on form and the subsequent use of that form for the great intellectual crimes of history before him in abrahamic cults and after him in the reformation into marxist cults.
Empiricism teaches testimony over analogy. It brings the court out of the courtroom. But at the high psychological cost of truth before face – and the disruption of our self-image and our status, the self-image and status of others, and the status and competence hierarchy. Thus creating a demand for trust and producing trust, only those people of martial and meritocratic loyalty can tolerate. So only the strong and trustworthy can testify, and the weak and untrustworthy resist.
Every culture has revolted against empiricism and its falsification over justification, reason over narrative, and systemizing over empathizing. Those revolts radiated from Britain just as agrarianism out of the Levant, and bronze out of Mesopotamia – causing disruption as they spread.
And within our Western culture, the revolt against empiricism continues. Because the desire for denial and evasion of reality is greater than the desire to produce trustworthiness and trust to defeat it by mastery of it, by mastery of its laws. We can sedate the weak, enslave the weak, enserf the weak, or end weakness. It’s just a matter of where we put the effort.
So the competition is between those who need not lie because they are in fact competent, and those who need lies because they are weak and incompetent , and those who would use lies to rally those who need lies, against those who are competent and capable of truth, reason, systemization, trustworthiness and trust.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-20 15:10:29 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627687139566661632
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627673575703601153
OPPRESSION THEORIES VS CONSPIRACY THEORIES
(And the causes and consequences)
Oppression narratives are the cognitively female and liberal version of the cognitively male and conservative conspiracy narratives.
This sex difference in cognitive biases originates in sex differences in status-seeking. Females seek status by evasion of responsibility and hyperconsumption, while males seek status by the accumulation of responsibility and capitalization.
So, the difference as in all things left vs right, is that we take male antisocial nonsense seriously because males are dangerous, and we ignore female antisocial nonsense because women aren’t dangerous.
At least, women weren’t dangerous until given the franchise. Now the opposite is true, and the present age is caused by the noise as the signal of women’s influence in politics travels through the civilizations’ institutional, traditional, normative, habitual, and cognitive capital structures.
This particular problem (which I can’t fully determine whether is cultural or biological) has allowed the industrialization of the female method of antisocial behavior using oppression narratives to take root in a population whose education, consumption, and voting is dominated by white females. (white females are the only group that defects from their ethnicity.
We endured marxism as we brought the lower classes into the franchise – a search for control.
Now we’re enduring feminism as we bring females into the franchise – a search for control
And unfortunately we’ve not falsified the female search for control as we have the lower class search for control.
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 19:28:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627389607703715841
RT @jordanbpeterson: Do not trust anyone who uses the words “disinformation” or “misinformation.”
What they mean is “opinions that run cont…
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 18:52:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627380530139344898
Possibly true but Area 51 Aliens? Chemtrails? Corporations?
(Yes white replacement, etc.)
Source date (UTC): 2023-02-19 14:22:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627312612810579970
Reply addressees: @TheAutistocrat @AdamMGrant @MaxBoot
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1627311063220862976