RT @EndWokeness: Black person refusing to date white people: “Not inherently racist”
White person refusing to date black people: “Yes, it…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:54:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640381843940728834
RT @EndWokeness: Black person refusing to date white people: “Not inherently racist”
White person refusing to date black people: “Yes, it…
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:54:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640381843940728834
(correct)
Storytelling (loading, framing, obscuring)
vs
Testifying (not loading, framing, obscuring)
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:50:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640380807465295873
Reply addressees: @WalterIII @stuntdawg77 @andimnoturbrah @ElijahSchaffer
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640378980418347009
The system of lies:
Female > Abrahamic Sequence > Marxist Sequence
It’s all sophistry and pseudoscience.
One lie after another.
Why?
Violates the laws of the universe: scarcity, behavior, evolution, and logic. https://t.co/qOnf8NSkAU

Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 15:17:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640372494635880449
Reply addressees: @PunishedPunishe
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640371271119654914
The tendency of young males of high disagreeability, and low achievement, to engage in conspiracy thinking is the mirror of the feminine and young females’ of high neuroticism and disagreeability to engage in oppression thinking. In both cases, it’s simply advertising that one feels out of control, because you have a low cooperative market value, and are in fact, not in control of your destiny. Severe cases are schizotypical expressions. And usually narrow-focus obsessions.
Therapy can help some of you. Medicine can help others. Success might help a bit. Women might help a bit. But in general ‘losers are gonna lose’.
Reply addressees: @xSpartan346x
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 00:58:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640156408799789057
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640154774719852544
The tendency of young males of high disagreeability, and low achievement, to engage in conspiracy thinking is the mirror of the feminine and young females’ of high neuroticism and disagreeability to engage in oppression thinking. In both cases, it’s simply advertising that one feels out of control, because you have a low cooperative market value, and are in fact, not in control of your destiny. Severe cases are schizotypical expressions. And usually narrow-focus obsessions.
Therapy can help some of you. Medicine can help others. Success might help a bit. Women might help a bit. But in general ‘losers are gonna lose’.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 00:58:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640156408900472837
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640154774719852544
Bob,
It’s why you pay the $8: long-form.
And it demonstrates why we need long-form.
Because short-form doesn’t permit persuasion – only agitation. Which was Twitter’s bread and butter.
Love you man.
Respect you.
But the Rothbardian era was a malinvestment.
An experiment from Mises to Rothbard to Hoppe, and from Hayek to folks like me. We solved social science in just three or four generations. We can take credit for it. But we can through continued malinvestment in ‘hokey religions’, sophistry, and pseudoscience.
Time to rise above past failures.
Hayek was right. Normative, non-intersubjectively testable property turns out to be the purpose of intersubjective verifiable property.
The Second Abrahamic Sequence of Marxist, NeoMarxist, Postmodern, Rothbardian, Feminist, NeoCon, Woke war on the private and common was just war against the secret of western civilization: the maximization of individual responsibility by the reward for returns on private and common property, beginning with truth before face regardless of cost.
Keep up the good fight.
-Cheers
Reply addressees: @BobMurphyEcon
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 00:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640151804510887937
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640148282478325760
Bob,
It’s why you pay the $8: long-form.
And it demonstrates why we need long-form.
Because short-form doesn’t permit persuasion – only agitation. Which was Twitter’s bread and butter.
Love you man.
Respect you.
But the Rothbardian era was a malinvestment.
An experiment from Mises to Rothbard to Hoppe, and from Hayek to folks like me. We solved social science in just three or four generations. We can take credit for it. But we can through continued malinvestment in ‘hokey religions’, sophistry, and pseudoscience.
Time to rise above past failures.
Hayek was right. Normative, non-intersubjectively testable property turns out to be the purpose of intersubjective verifiable property.
The Second Abrahamic Sequence of Marxist, NeoMarxist, Postmodern, Rothbardian, Feminist, NeoCon, Woke war on the private and common was just war against the secret of western civilization: the maximization of individual responsibility by the reward for returns on private and common property, beginning with truth before face regardless of cost.
Keep up the good fight.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-27 00:40:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640151804687052800
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640148282478325760
–“In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an encyclopedic demonstration that Critical Theory is pseudoscience.”– Alan Post
The entire marxist sequence is pseudoscience.
The jewish-abrahamic synthesis of european systematizing with semitic magical thinking was a novelty and the world was victimized by it. The marxist sequence just repeats the abrahamic sequence and is doing the same: detroying the world.
Masculine systematizing is persuasive but falsifiable. Feminine empathizing, magical thinking, and mythologizing, and social construction is too. But combine the two techniques in either Abrahamic theology or Marxist pseudoscience, and in both cases you end up with a religion of death.
Like I said.
I don’t know if a god exists.
I know that if a devil exists,
We know his name.
It’s Abraham.
And he was from Ur.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:18:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640085894035128320
–“In the case of Lindsay, I’ve described elsewhere, that New Discourses is an encyclopedic demonstration that Critical Theory is pseudoscience.”– Alan Post
The entire marxist sequence is pseudoscience.
The jewish-abrahamic synthesis of european systematizing with semitic magical thinking was a novelty and the world was victimized by it. The marxist sequence just repeats the abrahamic sequence and is doing the same: detroying the world.
Masculine systematizing is persuasive but falsifiable. Feminine empathizing, magical thinking, and mythologizing, and social construction is too. But combine the two techniques in either Abrahamic theology or Marxist pseudoscience, and in both cases you end up with a religion of death.
Like I said.
I don’t know if a god exists.
I know that if a devil exists,
We know his name.
It’s Abraham.
And he was from Ur.
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 20:18:43 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640085894169329664
“Q: WHY WAS THERE, IS THERE, NO AGREEMENT ON ‘BEING LIBERTARIAN’”
(As usual, the truth, and you won’t like it. Because you’re not a libertarian because you’re a good person. But because you’re just a lesser kind of bad person.) https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640068867497009155
Source date (UTC): 2023-03-26 19:12:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1640069304665161730
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1640068867497009155