They are also lies if they are used as lies, and frauds if they are used as frauds. How do you know the difference?
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:19:45 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643015456981151745
Reply addressees: @dannysmanifesto
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643015169084145664
JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
(justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?
Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.
And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132890456064
JUSTICE IS A “LIE-WORD” – AND THE LEFT LIES
(justice vs fairness vs equality vs equity vs proportionality)
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality?
Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only once we’ve restored reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The point is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality.
And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:06:32 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643012132693213184
I don’t recognize your alias here or remember it from FB. 😉 So I can only thank you for the respect. 😉
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.,
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality? Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only onece we’ve restord reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The piont is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality. And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:03:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643011249532272640
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643002846386823169
I don’t recognize your alias here or remember it from FB. 😉 So I can only thank you for the respect. 😉
Well technically speaking, as aristotle stated, and hayek confirmed, justice is unknowable (an ideal, not a real). Justice can occur in a particular (court case). But we then try to scale it as a dishonest pretention for ‘fairness’. And it can’t scale.
The proper term for fairness is not equality, or equity, but proportionality (meritocracy). What we use instead of justice, fairness, equity, or equality is ‘pervasive reciprocity within the limits of proportionality’. That means do everything as morally as possible, but if morality starts causing people to ‘defect’ because they’re left behind or outcast, then we must work to restore proportionality.,
Why? everyone pays the ‘tax’ of not doing evil for participation in the reciprocal markets. What if I don’t do evil but I still can’t participate? Well that’s a market failure. Now the left wants to do evil. That said, is it true that we have violated proportionality? Of course it is. That’s why we have people not benefitting from our current state of development. The difference is, some of us know why that’s happening (rent seeking, corruption, free riding, labor arbitrage, investment arbitrage). And we (or at least I) know how to fix that problem to restore proportionality without violating reciprocity, but by restoring reciprocity.
Only onece we’ve restord reciprocity (elminated all the bads) will we know if there remains a violate of proportionality. And ingeneral, in anglo civilization, in germanic civilization, we strive to produce commons to reduces costs in perpetuity for all, instead of engaging in redistribution in the moment that doesn’t.
The piont is that we try to restore responsibliilty, As long as people are responsible (don’t do bads, and the left does bads), then we must provide a means of restoring proportionality. And there is no metric for it. We can only observe it in human behavoir. And then determine whether it’s because of a violation of proportionality, or it’s another leftist attempt at a crime.
Reply addressees: @fukiffyknow
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 22:03:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643011249293197312
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1643002846386823169
RT @GameDevAnton: @whatifalthist There are two types of people: those who expose lies, and those who maintain them.
Marxists are the latte…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 08:09:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642801514908401668
RT @whatifalthist: I’ve just come to the conclusion Marxists are morally corrupt to their utter utter core. They have nothing redeeming. Th…
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-03 08:07:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642800887738318849
RT @elonmusk: The real tragedy of @NYTimes is that their propaganda isn’t even interesting
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 17:10:58 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642575360029073408
RT @Psyche_OS: Neuropredators created the mental and moral malware in San Francisco.
Twitter was the distribution server.
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 13:34:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642520770214600707
Interesting that the hashtags related to “RussiaUkraineWar” are blacklisted in the twitter code. Why would someone want to do that?
Source date (UTC): 2023-04-02 13:04:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1642513242646781953