Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Psychologizing, like moralizing, is an anti-social retreat into the evasion of a

    Psychologizing, like moralizing, is an anti-social retreat into the evasion of argument by the sequence of denial, undermining, rallying, reputation destruction, and social construction of cognitively feminine behavior.

    The most common cause is the cognitively feminine inability to tolerate violations of their self image, status, and sexual, social, economic,and political market value.

    Either one can make an argument or not.
    Either one can produce outputs demonstrating one’s ability or not.

    Failure to make an argument is demonstrating one lacks ability – and using denying, lying, undermining, rallying, and social construction demonstrates one lacks basic ethical and moral character.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-16 09:38:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647534971232440322

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647512410649919488

  • THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whatab

    THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS
    Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whataboutery’ yesterday who polluted every discussion by making excuses for everything imaginable. This person is male but effeminate in cognition, and ‘spiritual’ rather than empirical, and has the odd attraction to music, all of which are forms of self-gratification and emotional hyperconsumption.

    We had it right by limiting political participation to demonstrated competency.

    Our ‘solution’ is to increase the number of houses to separate those with demonstrated competency and demonstrated contribution to the commons by that competency, from those without having done so.

    Yes, rule of law matters far more than democracy. Yes it’s not clear that democracy is a net good rather than a net bad. But it is abundantly clear that unearned democratic participation is absolutely positively a net bad. And unearned democratic participation in the absence of rule of law of natural law, is just a slower road to totalitarianism, and the collapse that follows.

    The method of government is almost irrelevant. It’s rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity that matters. Everything else ‘good’ is merely a privilege of having succeeded at it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 14:02:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647238952032641024

  • THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whatab

    THE CURSE OF WELL-MEANING FOOLS
    Had to block a ‘whataboutist’ practicing ‘whataboutery’ yesterday who polluted every discussion by making excuses for everything imaginable. This person is male but effeminate in cognition, and ‘spiritual’ rather than empirical, and has the odd attraction to music, all of which are forms of self-gratification and emotional hyperconsumption.

    We had it right by limiting political participation to demonstrated competency.

    Our ‘solution’ is to increase the number of houses to separate those with demonstrated competency and demonstrated contribution to the commons by that competency, from those without having done so.

    Yes, rule of law matters far more than democracy. Yes it’s not clear that democracy is a net good rather than a net bad. But it is abundantly clear that unearned democratic participation is absolutely positively a net bad. And unearned democratic participation in the absence of rule of law of natural law, is just a slower road to totalitarianism, and the collapse that follows.

    The method of government is almost irrelevant. It’s rule of law by the natural law of self-determination, sovereignty and reciprocity that matters. Everything else ‘good’ is merely a privilege of having succeeded at it.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-15 14:02:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1647238952196227072

  • The problem isnt so much ‘news’ (awareness) but analysis) vs Political Posturing

    The problem isnt so much ‘news’ (awareness) but analysis) vs Political Posturing. I sort of run news while I’m working. The truth is not much of it’s worthy of recommendation. I just think the TLDR guys are the new generation of pretty honest reporters and that they’re pretty balanced and accurate in their analysis.

    TLDR News, Drivingmarkets, StoicMedia, Economics Explained, Zeihan, Caspian Report, WhatifaltHist, Kings and Generals.

    Mostly I enjoy channels that educate the public so that I don’t have to. 😉

    Reply addressees: @WalterIII

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 16:25:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646912490544979969

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646890690784395269

  • The problem isnt so much ‘news’ (awareness) but analysis) vs Political Posturing

    The problem isnt so much ‘news’ (awareness) but analysis) vs Political Posturing. I sort of run news while I’m working. The truth is not much of it’s worthy of recommendation. I just think the TLDR guys are the new generation of pretty honest reporters and that they’re pretty balanced and accurate in their analysis.

    TLDR News, Drivingmarkets, StoicMedia, Economics Explained, Zeihan, Caspian Report, WhatifaltHist, Kings and Generals.

    Mostly I enjoy channels that educate the public so that I don’t have to. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 16:25:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646912490641424385

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646890690784395269

  • Oh. FYI: start with research on sex differences in anti-social behavior. Females

    Oh. FYI: start with research on sex differences in anti-social behavior. Females: interpersonal and social (Sedition, undermining, conflict generation, baiting into hazard) vs male (simple criminality, drug and alcohol abuse). In this sense of anti-sociality: “men are bad and…

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 13:20:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646865906226675714

    Reply addressees: @NinaLiRE @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646781819809935360

  • Men lie systemically. Women lie as I stated: denial, evasion, suggestion, underm

    Men lie systemically. Women lie as I stated: denial, evasion, suggestion, undermining. The data in this paper does not rely on testing lying, it relies on confidence in limited knowledge. The study measures sex differences in confidence that an individual can solve a mathematical problem. So the author of the test (a male) essentially lied himself by systemic means by failing due diligence by failing to account for the most obvious answer.
    I can do this all day. It’s my job. And I’m the principle author of explaining the disambiguation of lying into sex differences.
    So why did you claim to understand this study as evidence when you lacked the competence to do so? The same reason as the boys in the study. But then you added female invective in addition for the purpose of reputation undermining.
    We are all very simple ‘bots’ really.
    We just require the illusion of greater agency than we have becuase we must maintain sufficient optimism to act in a kaleidic universe of uncertainty. And evolution provided us with that confidence. Otherwise we would suffer the consoiusness of the harshness of life.

    Reply addressees: @NinaLiRE @nathancofnas @TOOEdit

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 12:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646845817234284544

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646781819809935360

  • Men lie systemically. Women lie as I stated: denial, evasion, suggestion, underm

    Men lie systemically. Women lie as I stated: denial, evasion, suggestion, undermining. The data in this paper does not rely on testing lying, it relies on confidence in limited knowledge. The study measures sex differences in confidence that an individual can solve a mathematical problem. So the author of the test (a male) essentially lied himself by systemic means by failing due diligence by failing to account for the most obvious answer.
    I can do this all day. It’s my job. And I’m the principle author of explaining the disambiguation of lying into sex differences.
    So why did you claim to understand this study as evidence when you lacked the competence to do so? The same reason as the boys in the study. But then you added female invective in addition for the purpose of reputation undermining.
    We are all very simple ‘bots’ really.
    We just require the illusion of greater agency than we have becuase we must maintain sufficient optimism to act in a kaleidic universe of uncertainty. And evolution provided us with that confidence. Otherwise we would suffer the consoiusness of the harshness of life.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-14 12:00:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646845817335037953

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646781819809935360

  • Please stop wasting my time. You’re just making it up

    Please stop wasting my time. You’re just making it up.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-13 18:52:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646587285863890947

    Reply addressees: @geonal @kirk_lazy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646586383593603072

  • “I have PTSD from the Communists saying they are the doing ‘science’.”– A Frien

    –“I have PTSD from the Communists saying they are the doing ‘science’.”– A Friend

    Source date (UTC): 2023-04-13 18:10:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1646576698572374021