Theme: Deception

  • HICKS ON OUR MORAL DUTY TO IDEOLOGY OR TO REALITY (quotable) –“The Thompson-Kol

    HICKS ON OUR MORAL DUTY TO IDEOLOGY OR TO REALITY

    (quotable)

    –“The Thompson-Kolakowski conflict is an instructive example of a true-believer-apologist in conflict with an intellectually-honest thinker. While Thompson and Kolakowski were men of the Left, it’s important to note that the same psychological dichotomy runs through most intellectual movements. It’s the difference between those whose first loyalty is to a belief system and who will ignore or bend the facts to maintain their belief β€” and those whose first loyalty is to reality and who will alter or abandon their belief system to fit the facts.”–

    Stephen Hicks


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-03 11:51:00 UTC

  • COGNITIVE BIASES OF THE EMPIRICAL FIELDS? (question) What is the difference in t

    http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/sft.htmTHE COGNITIVE BIASES OF THE EMPIRICAL FIELDS?

    (question)

    What is the difference in the the cognitive biases of the different disciplines?

    1) Engineering and engineers

    2) Computer science and computer scientists,

    3) Economics and economists (statistics)

    4) Physics and physicists

    5) Mathematics and mathematicians?

    How would you stack-rank these five by:

    i) The weight given to understanding of human hubris vs human rationality?

    ii) The use of obscurant versus operational language

    iii) The use of platonist versus naturalistic language.

    iv) The requirement that people adapt to new knowledge, versus adapt technology to suit the needs and wants of people?

    v) The tendency to favor statist versus libertarian solutions?

    ON IQ

    Now, we have to understand some variations in the data. Mostly it’s a hierarchy of IQ. But Economists usually skew lower than the other disciplines because a) they are paid less, and b) the criteria for what is called an economics degree varies a lot. (It is very hard to make less than 100K as a computer scientist. It is very easy to make 150K. And not difficult to make 200K.) Given the damned rigor of the discipline I find this sort of thing interesting.

    DISCLAIMER

    I am educated as a fine artist, in Art Theory. (The philosophy of art and art history). Essentially as an art critic. Art just isn’t generally good enough to critique any more. πŸ™‚ Although the art-craft movement is still creative and beautiful. πŸ™‚ The movie business is the great sucking sound for artistic talent in America. And art has become a lower middle class occupation with an upper proletarian work force. It is not in the least bit aristocratic.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-11-03 09:43:00 UTC

  • LIBERALS GET CHEAP STATUS BY GIVING AWAY WHAT ISN’T THEIRS “…showcasing libera

    LIBERALS GET CHEAP STATUS BY GIVING AWAY WHAT ISN’T THEIRS

    “…showcasing liberal values is a form of conspicuous consumption….”

    Expensive drug addiction problem that they have. It turns out those endorphins are really expensive for EVERYONE ELSE.

    You ever watch some gushing women come to near tears at the thought of giving blood? That’s drug addiction. Just like stress addiction. Anger addiction, or thrill addiction.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-29 16:33:00 UTC

  • REPOST (quotable) Progressivism: Incrementalism via the art of ‘Obscure, Lie, an

    REPOST

    (quotable)

    Progressivism: Incrementalism via the art of ‘Obscure, Lie, and Justify’.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-29 09:48:00 UTC

  • Given the difficulty in constructing and maintaining lies, and the value of obsc

    Given the difficulty in constructing and maintaining lies, and the value of obscurant language in constructing the least detectable and most successful lies, what book would you recommend that could best, through study, teach one to lie?

    Now, having made that estimation, what book has empirically demonstrated the greatest ability to teach people to lie?


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-26 19:12:00 UTC

  • OPEN LETTER TO PROGRESSIVES (satire) An open letter from Anarcho Capitalists to

    OPEN LETTER TO PROGRESSIVES

    (satire)

    An open letter from Anarcho Capitalists to Progressives

    Hi.

    You know, we like people who disagree with us. It’s really fun to debate. We are nerds after all. We love this stuff.

    But, you know how you feel when Orthodox conservatives tell you something unscientifically, absolutely ridiculous? With a straight face? I mean, you can’t really hold an debate when science, reason, logic and fact go out the window. Just isn’t possible.

    Well, we feel the same way when you Orthodox Totalitarian Humanists say something economically ridiculous. And, if you’re talking, it’s pretty much economically ridiculous. Really. We love you and all. But. I mean. BOTH of you are ridiculous. You orthodox progressives, AND the orthodox conservatives.

    Now, a lot of libertarians are just as idealistic as you are. We have libertarians that think the world will someday wake up and agree with them; just like you think the world will agree with you, if ‘they only understood’. If they only “could see the light”.

    But, you know, most of us libertarians actually understand that none of us are going to change our moral preferences. I mean, that’s what science and evidence tell us.

    And so, given that none of us will change, we have this crazy idea that you can have your totalitarian government, and we can have our libertarian government, and if we do that, then we can get along just fine.

    We just wonder one thing: why won’t you let us live like we want to, if we are willing to let you live like you want to?

    It’s an honest question. Although, we kinda’ suspect we won’t get an honest answer. (Sorry, but we’re honest about this stuff.)

    And we also suspect that we’re the ones holding the moral high ground. ‘Cause we don’t want to conquer you. But unless you let us live our lives the way we want to, then you just want to conquer us.

    And we don’t think that’s moral, right, good, or nice.

    Cheers.

    Nerdy Anarcho Capitalist Libertarians Everywhere.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-25 15:31:00 UTC

  • DANIEL KEUHN : OBFUSCATORY LANGUAGE —“The greatest hesitation I have about the

    http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2013/10/donald-kuehn-none-of-them-along-the-line-know-what-any-of-its-worth-noted.htmlCONTRA DANIEL KEUHN : OBFUSCATORY LANGUAGE

    —“The greatest hesitation I have about the market economy is the wedge between demand and the willingness to pay that is the ability to pay.” —

    Curtd said…

    Hmm…

    (a) What is incorrectly allocated in the structure of production that allows people to desire to consume, but have nothing to exchange?

    (b) It is probably true that if we bypassed the financial system, and inflated the currency, by directly, say, crediting people’s debit cards – as long as it was done equally, that this would increase activity in the economy by redistributing savings and investment that are not moving, to consumers who desire to spend. We’ve been talking about this for a couple of decades now.

    (c) But why is there structural misallocation in the first place, and what misallocations are we creating this way?

    — We are creating poor single parent households. Would this activity increase the rate of creation of single parent households?

    — We are clearly failing at education of our work force compared to the Germans

    — We are clearly transforming old age savings into academic institution equity, and long term student debt, without performing any useful education other than sortition.

    — We are clearly immigrating vast numbers of low wage workers rather than employing our young and old at higher cost, and therefore creating two dependent classes.

    — We are clearly destroying the system of intergenerational cooperation of savings and borrowing, and the information system that goes with it.

    — We are clearly depending upon future anticipated growth, based upon a five hundred years of the spread of anglo absolute nuclear families, accounting, law, money and prices around the world by forcible conquest and unforced competition.

    (d) Instead: WHAT TROUBLES ME IS THE MISALLOCATION OF ACTION, CAPITAL, CREDIT, and POLICY THAT PREVENTS PEOPLE WHO DESIRE TO PAY FROM EARNING SOMETHING TO PAY FOR IT.

    One can use the artful word ‘wedge’ as a means of obfuscation: As OBSCURANT LANGUAGE, in order to obfuscate the underlying CAUSAL RELATIONS. This is what it means to speak as a leftist: using obscurant, and therefore, unscientific language. πŸ™‚

    At least the right’s religious people speak in analogy not obfuscation. πŸ™‚ The left’s religious people simply use obfuscatory language, and artificially select short time horizons so that they can ignore externalities. πŸ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-24 19:17:00 UTC

  • PREVALECE OF CORRUPTION : ASIANS AND EDUCATION (low trust society) (corruption)

    http://educationrealist.wordpress.com/2013/10/08/asian-immigrants-and-what-no-one-mentions-aloud/CULTURAL PREVALECE OF CORRUPTION : ASIANS AND EDUCATION

    (low trust society) (corruption) (education)

    The author doesn’t take the time to put in the references to the empirical work, but he does talk a bit about Asian performance.

    1) high test scores

    2) hard work for them

    3) pervasive cheating

    4) not matched by college performance.

    5) not matched by performance in real life.

    6) Colleges are discriminating against admission of asians.

    I don’t much care really. Because NORTH EAST asians assimilate and really, except for their slight weakness in verbal skills, they end up as pretty good citizens, behaviorally indistinguishable from us, with all the right status signals. And, if what I’ve read is correct, they lose the pervasive asian corruption fairly quickly. Within a generation or so.

    I wish we could get everyone else to work hard and conform. πŸ™‚


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-24 03:56:00 UTC

  • “THE CULTURE OF PREVENTION” : WESTERN POSITIVISM : THE SIX RULES OF PREVENTION :

    “THE CULTURE OF PREVENTION” : WESTERN POSITIVISM : THE SIX RULES OF PREVENTION : THE SYSTEMATIC WESTERN ADOPTION OF JEWISH OBSCURANTISM

    (insight)

    The interesting thing about western culture, is the underlying assumption that we can CHANGE THE WORLD to suit our desires. It’s a POSITIVE outlook on life. Life isn’t suffering or difficult. Its an opportunity for heroisim and GLORY. “The purpose of life is to bend nature to our will, such that we leave the world better for having lived in it.”

    Think about the rest of the world’s “golden rule” and the anglo saxon “silver rule”. While they say “do unto others” we say “do not do unto others, that which you would not have done unto you.” The implied sovereignty in the Anglo Silver Rule is quite different from the slavish peasantry implied in the Golden Rule.

    WESTERN CIV is the culture of PREVENTION, under the ASSUMPTION that we can achieve our desires if no external entity PREVENTS IT. So our goal is to let everyone pursue their desires, and for us to pursue our mutual desires, and to PREVENT anyone from impeding that process. Nature is beautiful for this reason, as is man, as is life. Because it is not a struggle for the opportunity to pursue one’s fancy, it is a struggle only to prevent those from preventing us from pursuing our fancies.

    This is much more English a vision than the German vision of accomplishing the same thru duty.

    THE MAGIC LAWS OF THE CULTURE OF PREVENTION

    1) PREVENT THE USE OF POWER : DECENTRALIZATION, BALANCE OF FORCES, COMPETITION, MILITIA, SOVEREIGNTY

    2) PREVENT VIOLENCE THEFT AND FREE RIDING : PRIVATE PROPERTY AND COMMON LAW, RIGOROUS NORMS

    3) PREVENT LOSS OF CAPITAL : FORCE ALL CONFLICT INTO THE MARKET WHERE IT PRODUCES CAPITAL RATHER THAN DESTROYS IT

    4) PREVENT THE IMMORAL SOCIETY OF THE EXTENDED FAMILY : NUCLEAR FAMILY AND PRIVATE PROPERTY

    5) PREVENT CONQUEST BY SUPERIOR FORCES : RELY ON TECHNOLOGY, PROFESSIONAL WARRIORS, AND THE MILITIA, TO MAKE USE OF INFERIOR NUMBERS AND WEALTH.

    6) PREVENT FRAUD BY OBSCURANTISM : TRUTH, SCIENCE, AND OPERATIONAL LANGUAGE

    THE CULTURE THAT DECRIES HUBRIS

    Greek mythology would only be created by a people who had such confidence that their warning would be a universal caution against any incidence of hubris. It is the mythology of a cautious, conservative, but confident people. The same is true for Germanic mythology. Albeit Christianity tries desperately to tame it by directing it to positive uses. The church could not defend against the Normans so they directed them to fighting the crusades. Not that the crusades were not a good use of men. But that it gave vent to the warrior ethos. Chivalric codes did the rest by allowing warriors, or those who could not afford to be, or those not able to be, to demonstrate heroism through service.

    ON THE WESTERN ADOPTION OF JEWISH OBSCURANTISM

    Unfortunately Jewish culture has mastered the art of obscurantism, pseudo-rationality and pseudo-science, as a means of undermining land-holder moral and social codes, and we have failed to convert them to our aristocratic doctrine. Or we had succeeded prior to the second world war, when American Jewry and Scotts Presbyterians were indistinguishable from one another, and both doing our civilization justice. Since them, we have legions of westerners in university settings doing the same, since Freud, Marx, Cantor gave birth to the Bolsheviks, the Frankfurt School and the Postmodernists took control of the university in an effort to claim for themselves what had previously been the social power of the church.

    Thought leadership in obscurantism has, since then, become a western profession thanks to Kant, Heidegger, Rorty, Adorno, Foucault. Rawls tried to resurrect it with his Victorian parlor trick, and Hayek alone could not hold them back, because he confused psychology with the necessity of calculation and did not yet have the analogy of computer science to help him solve the problem as we propertarians have.

    Mises and Rothbard took us again, into another Jewish pseudo-science, which Hoppe partly rescued us from, and which I’m trying to rescue us from entirely.

    But the real heavy lifting has been done, as always in the west, by empirical scientists in the Anglo tradition, leaving the rationalists in the continental tradition, once again, searching for some form of obscurantism to justify their tyrannical appropriation from the masses, and the meritocratic natural aristocracy that would arise without their predation on them by means of force of government, and various modes of obscurantist language.

    Meanwhile at home, as means of resisting the state, the religious right uses a time honored form of obscurantism themselves to save their society from conquest by the predatory state bureaucracy.

    OBSCURANT LANGUAGE IS IMMORAL BECAUSE IT IS FRAUD. IF YOU CANNOT DESCRIBE IT IN THE LANGUAGE OF ACTION (AS OPERATIONS) THEN YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND IT. IF YOU USE OBSCURANT LANGUAGE YOU ARE LYING, WHETHER YOU UNDERSTAND IT OPERATIONALLY OR NOT.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 08:39:00 UTC

  • “INEQUALITY IS THE PRICE OF DIVERSITY” Now some people have tried to argue other

    “INEQUALITY IS THE PRICE OF DIVERSITY”

    Now some people have tried to argue otherwise, but they confuse the market with the political and normative. AGGREGATES ARE DECEPTIONS. Aggregates launder causality.Causality in human affairs consists of people following incentives in real time, where those incentives are, at any moment, more or less probable. And people are quite simple following their incentives:

    INCENTIVE SELECTION

    1) The Greatest Reward

    2) In the shortest time.

    3) At the least effort.

    4) At the lowest risk.

    5) With the greatest certainty.

    ANOTHER PROPERTARIAN LESSON : CLEARING THE NETWORK OF PREFERENCES

    People do not order their preferences. The evaluate the weights of any action in CLEARING a set of preferences. They evaluate the set of any actions in clearing further preferences.

    ANOTHER PROPERTARIAN LESSON : THE STATUS ECONOMY

    1) Status is the human economy, and money is just a vehicle for it.

    2) Loss aversion for status is higher than any other loss aversion other than life, limb and offspring. Money isn’t as important as status. Status gets one access to opportunity.

    3) STATUS SIGNALS in group are CHEAPER to get an maintain than status signals across groups.

    That last bit is why diversity doesn’t work.


    Source date (UTC): 2013-10-20 07:44:00 UTC