Kleptocratic Progressivism : “It’s perfectly ok to lie cheat and steal for a good cause.”
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-20 03:43:00 UTC
Theme: Deception
-
(Hillary is trying to be likable rather than competent. Bad campaign advice. She
(Hillary is trying to be likable rather than competent. Bad campaign advice. She isn’t likeable. She’s unpleasant, with a dishonesty she learned from Alinsky like Obama. She’s not even a very good person. Her reputation was closer to the Iron Lady’s: one of decisive seriousness, than to likability. And while one can fake competence one cannot really fake likability. Personally I think she’d be even worse than Obama has been. But at least we’d have her husband as a proxy in the white house. I can’t really see her surviving much longer. But Bill is pretty smart. We’ll see.)
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-19 10:22:00 UTC
-
OPERATIONALISM UNDER PROPERTARIANISM RENDERS POSTMODERNIST, CRITIQUE, AND KANTIA
OPERATIONALISM UNDER PROPERTARIANISM RENDERS POSTMODERNIST, CRITIQUE, AND KANTIAN ARGUMENTS IMPOSSIBLE.
LAUNDERING: Laundering actions and individuals via aggregation into symbols, objects and entities
LOADING: Loading with emotional or moral sentiments
FRAMING: Framing by selection of causes and properties
OVERLOADING: Overloading by production of a multitude of
CRITIQUE: Using all of the above to defend a straw man by attacking with overloading, framing, loading and laundering. An elaborate means of distraction from a hidden agenda.
POSTMODERNISM: an attempt to conflate fact and value, such that value distorts fact.
KANTIAN: an attempt to justify moral authority independent of experience.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-15 09:49:00 UTC
-
Operationalism Under Propertarianism Renders Postmodernist, Critique, and Kantian Arguments Impossible
Deceptions LAUNDERING: Laundering actions and individuals via aggregation into symbols, objects and entities LOADING: Loading with emotional or moral sentiments FRAMING: Framing by selection of causes and properties OVERLOADING: Overloading by production of a multitude of arguments Applications THE COSMOPOLITAN TECHNIQUE: CRITIQUE: Using all of the above to defend a straw man by attacking with overloading, framing, loading and laundering. An elaborate means of distraction from a hidden agenda. THE GERMAN TECHNIQUE – KANTIAN: an attempt to justify moral authority independent of experience. THE ANGLO TECHNIQUE – POSTMODERNISM: an attempt to conflate fact and value, such that value distorts fact.
-
Operationalism Under Propertarianism Renders Postmodernist, Critique, and Kantian Arguments Impossible
Deceptions LAUNDERING: Laundering actions and individuals via aggregation into symbols, objects and entities LOADING: Loading with emotional or moral sentiments FRAMING: Framing by selection of causes and properties OVERLOADING: Overloading by production of a multitude of arguments Applications THE COSMOPOLITAN TECHNIQUE: CRITIQUE: Using all of the above to defend a straw man by attacking with overloading, framing, loading and laundering. An elaborate means of distraction from a hidden agenda. THE GERMAN TECHNIQUE – KANTIAN: an attempt to justify moral authority independent of experience. THE ANGLO TECHNIQUE – POSTMODERNISM: an attempt to conflate fact and value, such that value distorts fact.
-
PROPAGANDA NOW MAINSTREAM
http://www.examiner.com/list/russia-s-top-20-lies-about-ukraineRUSSIAN PROPAGANDA NOW MAINSTREAM
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-07 12:11:00 UTC
-
FUTURE REFERENCE (adding to my site’s ‘debate’ area)
http://vigilantcitizen.com/latestnews/the-25-rules-of-disinformation/FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
(adding to my site’s ‘debate’ area)
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-04 08:50:00 UTC
-
Untitled
http://www.buzzfeed.com/maxseddon/documents-show-how-russias-troll-army-hit-america
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-02 19:38:00 UTC
-
FFS, READ PEOPLE YOU DISAGREE WITH. Its called confirmation bias for a reason. T
FFS, READ PEOPLE YOU DISAGREE WITH.
Its called confirmation bias for a reason.
Try falsification for a bit. Learn something.
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-29 14:46:00 UTC
-
From A Self Styled Provacateur
Regarding: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/05/david-hathaway/are-you-talking-to-a-agent-provocateur/ ( I Thought about this for a day before commenting, and I won’t tear the author of the post apart for his use of technique of Marxist Critique, despite it being a classic example of the method. Libertarians spent too much time with marxists and not enough time with scientists.) [I] am trying to reform libertine, rothbardian ‘ghetto’ libertarianism for the good of liberty seekers everywhere, and am absolutely, by deliberate choice, using provocation. There is no other means of attacking dogma than to force dogmatists to defend against it by direct confrontation. (Marxist Critiques or no) 1) Thick / Humanist / Psychological / Left libertarianism is a luxury good, and it is neither scientifically or rationally formulated, remaining true to the psychological tradition of classical liberalism. We CAN form a polity under Thick libertarianism, as long as luxuries are voluntarily constructed, requiring voluntary participation, rather than mandated. 2) Aristocratic Egalitarian / Scientific libertarianism is necessary and sufficient for the formation of a voluntary polity in the absence of the state. It is both rationally and scientifically formulated. We CAN form a polity under aristocratic egalitarianism. 3) Thin / Ghetto / libertine / Brutalist libertarianism is necessary but INSUFFICIENT for the formation of a voluntary polity in the absence of the state. It is rationally but not scientifically formulated. And furthermore, would be the target of conquest and oppression by all nearby polities. We CANNOT form a polity under rothbardian, ghetto, libertinism. So this particular provocateur is doing his moral duty in the pursuit of a state of liberty. I do not care whether we choose luxuries or not. But we have no option to choose a libertine / Ghetto / Thin polity. It is irrational to construct one on transaction costs alone. It is unsurvivable given external hostility to all groups who have demonstrated ghetto ethics: (Gypsies and pre-modern Jews the most common examples). Cheers. An admitted Provocateur. PS: The revolution in Ukraine would not have been possible if it were not for the risks taken by the Right Sector. Most people (like rothbardians) are free riders. They won’t participate until there isn’t any risk.