Theme: Deception

  • It’s a lot easier to love your fellow man when you realize that aside from the p

    It’s a lot easier to love your fellow man when you realize that aside from the passionately envious left, pretty much everyone else is a well meaning fool beset with overwhelming incompetence.

    Think locally. Act locally. You are too ignorant to do otherwise.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-11 12:30:00 UTC

  • But I am not sure why we shouldn’t prohibit obscurantism (pollution) in matters

    But I am not sure why we shouldn’t prohibit obscurantism (pollution) in matters of the commons, if people seek to stop it.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-10 12:20:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/641949244660805632

    Reply addressees: @mdavilamartinez

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/641669293730492416


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/641669293730492416

  • CHOMSKY’S METAPHYSICAL FALLACY (Interesting post on understanding Chomsky via an

    CHOMSKY’S METAPHYSICAL FALLACY

    (Interesting post on understanding Chomsky via anglo vs jewish metaphysical assumptions)

    You know, at least Chomsky, unlike most lefties is well read. Or, rather, he’s well enough read that he at least makes partially rational arguments. But once you understand that his underlying metaphysical desire (or maybe assumption) is a cooperative world in which we are all shepherds of goats, sheep, merchandise, and information (information, myth, gossip, lies), roaming a desert, steppe, or ocean, paying no costs of landholding, and in particular no normative costs of landholding – instead of landholding farmers and capital producers that must constantly pay the high costs and normative costs of land holding – you see right through every single statement he makes as just another poor dimwitted fool indoctrinated into the nonsense metaphysics of religious ‘belief’. I mean, Jewish and Muslim cults are fascinating because they place a tragic and false conformity on their peoples: in the case of jews they are both conquered, diasporic, persecuted, because they do not grasp the central tenet of their faith: that they could not hold judea because they failed to transform from slaves, shepherds, and traders to land holders – because their ethic lacks the mandate that they pay the high cost of norms. They do not live in a world where the steppe, desert, sea, air, or even information system is ‘un owned’. So not only is their faith predicated on a lie (mysticism) but it is predicated on a suicidal falsehood: that they can parasitically exist off land holders who will eventually persecute them for their parasitism, and that they accumulate wealth merely by circumventing those real and normative costs, and indoctrinate themselves into land- holding. instead, they maintain group cohesion by threat of ostracization from internal insurance and advocacy, and the wealth effect of parasitic free riding on land-holders and land holder ethics.

    Well, now lets flip it around and see what errors we Anglos engage in – because it’s not dissimilar, just from the opposite end of the spectrum of land-holding vs migratory labor: an island fortress people, defended like Crete’s Mycenaean civilization by an accomplished navy. Or america, like Rome, entirely dependent for its culture on Athens(Britain) and Sparta(german), exhausting itself with conquest in pursuit of commercial wealth. Anglos live under the illusion that the aristocracy of everyone is either possible or desirable, despite the fact that the reason that the island of Britain developed a near-aristocracy of everyone, was through thousands of years of genetic pacification of the underclasses – leaving only the martial middle and working class, and the rotating upper middle classes alive (as is true throughout most of the hanjal/hanseatic civilization we fail to distinguish from its Mediterranean cousin. But which aside from being christian differs vastly in myths and norms. And then again, that Hanjal/Hansa civilization varies less from its Celtic civilization that was destroyed by the roman conquest of Europe(“Celtica”.)

    Now, look at how desperate the academy and state are to seek status by perpetuating the neo-puritan mythos…

    I mean, government is a ‘bad’ because it allows twisted people the power to do twisted things, for reasons that they don’t understand, but are always reducible to status seeking self interest.

    The Age of Political Empowerment (the Enlightenment era) has been every bit a catastrophe in politics, as the age of technology (the enlightenment) has been a success.

    We cannot revert to the past, we can only complete the transition and remove the folly of will from the state.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-10 07:48:00 UTC

  • US INTELLIGENCE REVOLTS AGAINST ADMINISTRATION LAUNDERING OF REPORTS Great artic

    US INTELLIGENCE REVOLTS AGAINST ADMINISTRATION LAUNDERING OF REPORTS

    Great article today on how dozens of US Intelligence analysts are calling the administration ‘liars’ on our ‘successes’ against ISIS / ISIL. The’ve been at it for a year now and they were told maybe they should ‘retire’. They state that they did not speak up during the Bush administration, when poor intelligence reports formed the basis of Bush’s belief in weapons of mass destruction – that we later found didn’t exist. They don’t want this to happen again. So they’re speaking up: it’s not going well against ISIS ISIL. But what is more important (to me) since I know ISIS / ISIL isn’t doing all that badly at all, is that they Intelligence community is taking the heat for the WMD debacle – and showing it. I love that there are ethical people in the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-10 06:22:00 UTC

  • INSIGHT INTO THE DAMAGE OF LEVANTINE MONOTHEISM AND PSYCHOLOGY UPON THE FRAMEWOR

    http://bit.ly/1K1OwnHAN INSIGHT INTO THE DAMAGE OF LEVANTINE MONOTHEISM AND PSYCHOLOGY UPON THE FRAMEWORK OF WESTERN THOUGHT

    Just an insight into one of the many ways authoritarian cosmopolitan pseudoscience of psychology has damaged our world view: introversion is the result of deep thinking, and ‘neuroticism’ (worry) is the result of deep thinking. Both of which are criticized rather than rewarded. Everyone else is just ‘noise’ without the deep thinkers.

    My work on Propertarianism taught me to see us as locally specialized ants, and that there is no such thing as an ideal individual other than one who does so honestly and knowingly.

    Our observable personalities advocate for acquisition on behalf of our genes. Because of our different reproductive costs, very desirable males, very desirable females, and every gradation in between, is merely negotiating using his or her necessary strategy. What makes us ‘crazy’ is when we construct lies.

    MONOTHEISM did this damage via ‘one-ness’. That’s how damaging it is. It’s freaking tragic. Polytheism did not do this to us.

    This is a profound restatement of the nature of man.

    We are expensive creatures. We must act to acquire ‘property’ – that which we inventory for our own use and consumption. Cooperation is so disproportionately rewarding a means of acquisition we must bias in favor of cooperation to acquire. But cooperation invites parasitism. So we must act to punish violations of cooperation. And cooperation is always an act of experiment: trial and error. So we must preserve non-cooperation in our genes in order to ensure that unlike lemmings, we break off when cooperation is no longer in our interests.

    This is man. Everything else is accumulated lie. Most of it from babylonian and levantine deceit. Meanwhile in every epoch europeans seek to overturn this authoritarian deceit and return to our pagan egalitarian origins.

    Propertarianism tells us how.

    (a) we are all different and therefore need our own ‘gods’ for use in our own virtue ethics.

    (b) Monotheism is more damaging because of ‘one-ness’ (and equality) whereas polytheism (correctly) preserves differences (and hierarchy).

    (c) Perfect rulers are infallible and demand we obey(positivism), and imperfect rules are not always working in our interests and demand only we do not irritate them (falsificationism).

    Freudian Psychology further expanded one-ness and servitude by demanding conformity to a personality type that could be forcibly indoctrinated through peer pressure, guilt and shaming (and it worked), whereas polytheistic reasoning, and darwinian reasoning, and scientific analysis tell us that we each fulfill niche’s that need exploiting.

    Monotheism, 20th century Democracy, and Freudian psychology,all perpetuate a catastrophic fallacy of man. But why was this fallacy developed? Well, in Judaism it was developed for the same reason monotheism was developed between the Iranians and the Indians, who were originally the same people: to put them into conflict so that the Iranians could be controlled (by lying). Just as the jews needed a reason to unite different primitive tribes (by lying). Whereas in the west we did not encounter this problem since rule was achieved by arms, not deceit. It was only once Rome was too weak to enforce rule by arms that Justinian closed the schools and imposed christianity on the west. The value of christianity is in that it was ‘germanicized’ and that the central proposition: extension of kin love to non-kin was useful in uniting Europe under christian kings sanctioned by the church.

    This criticism of ‘monopoly’ and ‘monotheism’ and ‘one-ness’ and ‘equality’ is an application of the propertarian principle of the intertemporal division of reproductive perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy, between the consumptive (feminine) productive (libertarian), and accumulative (conservative) biases, wherein the only means by which we can make use of all available perception, cognition, and knowledge in the spectrum, is to conduct voluntary exchanges between the classes in that division of perception, cognition, and knowledge, just as the only means by which we can make use of the knowledge in the market is by voluntary exchange, money, prices, and contract.

    This a profound reformulation of the enlightenment vision of man, and the necessary form of government that assists him in production, reproduction, and genetic persistence

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    Testimonialism, Propertarianism, New Classical liberalism.

    The Propertarian Institute , Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-08 05:27:00 UTC

  • “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” 😉

    “Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.” 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-07 06:29:00 UTC

  • Did’ja ever notice that a woman can dislike you quite a bit, and fool you for we

    Did’ja ever notice that a woman can dislike you quite a bit, and fool you for weeks, months or years if it’s useful for her? I am freaking clueless. lol. No wonder Socrates wanted to leave Athens and go live as a hermit and Confucius did… I wouldn’t want to think like a woman. It would be horrible. But I do wish I could SEE what they SEE. This whole relative information deprivation thing is just not fair. lol.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-06 09:05:00 UTC

  • I FIGURED OUT CHOMSKY’S BIAS It wasn’t that hard, but usually I can’t read or li

    I FIGURED OUT CHOMSKY’S BIAS

    It wasn’t that hard, but usually I can’t read or listen to him very long without getting angry. But in his speeches on AI I’ve been able to put together what he’s doing, and how it’s another hack of pathological altruism.

    I don’t disagree with a lot of his technical arguments – even if I don’t like the language he uses. But he’s definitely a cosmopolitan railing against the fact that he lives in a world that doesn’t tolerate free riders. And that his intuition is that the world would be better with free riders. Instead of the fact that his privilege is due to the systematic persecution of free riding in all three cultures that harbor him.


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-06 06:50:00 UTC

  • REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN” Western Man is moral man, and moral men need: 1 – A Moral

    REVOLUTION: “THE PLAN”

    Western Man is moral man, and moral men need:

    1 – A Moral Justification for the application of Violence to institute change. (They are being lied to, and stolen from, and conquered systematically, and I explain how, why, and how to stop it.) (Ideologies require promise of actionable results within the current lifetime.)

    2 – A Solution to Demand: a set of institutional changes (concentration of effort) (an expansion of the classical liberal legal order to suppress lying, wishful thinking, bias and error in matters of the political commons; and a reconstruction of the houses of government as a market for the voluntary construction of commons.)

    3 – A means of transition from one order to another. (An ordered means of rapid transformation within the status quo.)

    4 – A set of tactics for raising the cost of the status quo: insurrection via: nullification (gradual disempowerment and transition to new government), secession(construction of a new government retaining the previous competitor), revolution (replacement of the people in government and modification of institutions eliminating the previous competitor) and civil war (destruction of the government and replacement with an entirely new one, eliminating the previous competitors).

    5 – A set of leaders (speakers) to rally action. (I need 100 people. That’s all. I need only twelve who are very good.) Propertarianism and Testimonialism will be a more complete framework than has been produced before, even if we take into account all of Locke,Hume,Smith and Jefferson as a set.

    And if I fail, then the work sits in books and records until someone decides to use it or create something better. But I will have my good service.

    One leads a horse to water, but cannot make it drink.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-02 03:13:00 UTC

  • Yes, name calling is not an argument, it’s the the avoidance of an argument, by

    Yes, name calling is not an argument, it’s the the avoidance of an argument, by someone who lacks one. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2015-09-01 00:07:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638503304465657856

    Reply addressees: @MatthewRenauld

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/638439952779358208