Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Is Islam Objectively Evil? Why?

    [I]t is not that one fails to comprehend it (accept its fallacies). It is that it is objectively evil in every dimension: One does not judge a product by its advertising but by it's performance. One does not judge a religion by its narrative or claims, but by the status of its adherents. One does not judge a statement by its meaning or justification but by its truth or falsehood. One does not justify antique (primitive) language and reasoning ,in modern (advanced) context. So advocates make at least these four errors – all of which are both false and mere excuses to do what is familiar rather than to do what is true. Islam is the most regressive philosophy on earth – it is even worse than communism. All others are superior. They are superior because the epistemology, social order, and objective of the competitors are superior. The only measure of a philosophy is the economic status of its adherents. The only measure of a business plan is its success in the market. The only measure of a political system is its non-parasitic production of commons. The only measure of your argument is an excuse to persist what amounts to one of the great lies of history that weaponizes ignorance. Islam spreads ignorance in the mind and consequential poverty. Just as communism spread pseudoscience and poverty. Every word you speak it its advocacy defense, or practice is destructive to mankind. This a merely an empirical statement. I can, conversely, construct an internal consistent argument of why islam manufactures ignorance, but this is beyond this conversation. And with both internal consistency and external correspondence, and moral objectivity, we have constructed a scientific argument that objectively demonstrates that islam is everything a devil would wish it to be: the cancer of mankind.

  • Is Islam Objectively Evil? Why?

    [I]t is not that one fails to comprehend it (accept its fallacies). It is that it is objectively evil in every dimension: One does not judge a product by its advertising but by it's performance. One does not judge a religion by its narrative or claims, but by the status of its adherents. One does not judge a statement by its meaning or justification but by its truth or falsehood. One does not justify antique (primitive) language and reasoning ,in modern (advanced) context. So advocates make at least these four errors – all of which are both false and mere excuses to do what is familiar rather than to do what is true. Islam is the most regressive philosophy on earth – it is even worse than communism. All others are superior. They are superior because the epistemology, social order, and objective of the competitors are superior. The only measure of a philosophy is the economic status of its adherents. The only measure of a business plan is its success in the market. The only measure of a political system is its non-parasitic production of commons. The only measure of your argument is an excuse to persist what amounts to one of the great lies of history that weaponizes ignorance. Islam spreads ignorance in the mind and consequential poverty. Just as communism spread pseudoscience and poverty. Every word you speak it its advocacy defense, or practice is destructive to mankind. This a merely an empirical statement. I can, conversely, construct an internal consistent argument of why islam manufactures ignorance, but this is beyond this conversation. And with both internal consistency and external correspondence, and moral objectivity, we have constructed a scientific argument that objectively demonstrates that islam is everything a devil would wish it to be: the cancer of mankind.

  • A Very New Cut On Intellectual History

    (draft) [S]o Zoroastrianism was constructed to divide the Persians and indians who were both southern indo european peoples. Then the Talmud was constructed as a lie to justify retention of property after the end of the babylonian conquest. THE REVOLUTION The greeks invent reason, truth, science, politics for the management of people at scale. The Romans, seeing the ‘verbalism’ (immorality) of the greeks, resist greek idealism and embrace practical and empirical means. THE RESISTANCE BY DECEIT Then judaism evolved as a means by which to justify parasitism upon host civilizations while maintaining group cohesion. Then christianity was constructed as a rebellion against the empire, that had deprived primitive people of their local status signals. Then the bible was constructed to manage the hordes through false promise now that production by slavery was no longer possible. Then the koran was constructed to unite the tribes and conquer the peninsula (and then the exhausted Byzantines and Sassanids, and North Africa, and then Spain. ) THE FAILURES AT RESTORATION The Carolingians failed to construct an economic and political order. although the trade routes from Italy to the Netherlands and then to the north sea peoples created incremental organic evolution. The Templars created the legal and credit system and were destroyed by the authoritarian church who was their debtor. The Hansa recreated the legal, credit, and trade system. But were out-competed by the territorial powers that largely adopted their methods. The development of the new world and colonies allowed the financing of the transition of the west to economic modernity. (despite that there was little long term benefit to western nations, and strangely enough quite a considerable benefit to colonies depending upon who colonized them.) THE RESTORATION OF TRUTH Then the anglos responded with the enlightenment, empiricism, and the restoration of truth (science). The french responded with … rousseuan pseudoscience and pseudo morality, as a means of creating the terror, and attempting to unify all of europe under their despotism. The germans respond with restating christian mysticism as kantian rationalism. And create a new vehicle for obscurantism. The Jews responded by converting the hansa/templar system to their advantage in the territorial wars between Britain and France (Napoleonic wars) creating the Rothschild and consequent systems of order creation by using our own capital stock and lending it back to us. Westerners responded with the nation-state, an attempt to construct professional bureaucracy, the gold standard, empire and the industrial revolution. Most importantly, american constitution and it’s somewhat failed attempt at natural law expressed as a formal logic of cooperation. Jews responded with an attack on the academy and polity by creating the great pseudosciences: Boazian Sociology, Marxist Economics and Politics, Freudian Psychology. All of which were constructed to universalize separatist judaism or justify hosting jewish separatism despite it’s parasitisms. This merely taking the argumentatitve innovations of the french and germans combining them with the same obscurantist ‘preaching’ technique used to distribute Christianity, except now using the power of the printing press. BRANCH : We branch now into various evolutions upon this new religion – faster innovation in the technologies of truth and falsehood. Branch 1 – Jewish Then the second wave: Popperian philsophy, Misesian Economics, Randian/Rothbardian Libertinism. (the half-failure/half-success) Then the third wave: straussian neo-conservativsm and expansionary militarism of the ‘new rome’. (the madness of power) Branch 2 – Neo Puritan Then the adoption of Keyneisan Economics as the new innumerate pseudoscience. and Rawlsian Ethics as the pseudo morality. Then the adoption of postmodern philosophy in academia. THE FAILED REACTION Mises in economics, Brouwer in Mathematics, Bridgman in Physics (science), Popper in philosophy, A HOST of authors in Law. And a total catastrophic absence in Politics since majoritarianism was still influential everywhere. RESTORATION: Science catches up with the deceit and starts to disprove it. The various cognitive scientists, and neurologists, are largely responsible for our reframing of jewish monopoly conformity to western distribution of talents and abilities. EO Wilson states that a synthesis of biology, morality, politics and economics – all the sciences – should be possible. Archaeologists and historians and evolutionary biologists in our social orders. Haidt, the empirical psychologists, and the anthropologists in the evolution of cooperation. SYNTHESIS Doolittle in Economics, Politics, Ethics, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology and Metaphysics. In retrospect this is my view of the evolution of history as a competition between the different european tribes, most of which practice morality and one of which practices immorality. And the reason being that if we hold land we can construct moral rules because we must in order to create the commons of land holding. A parasitic people that does not need or cannot hold land need not create commons because they can use the host’s. THE CENTRAL SUBJECT OF OUR DISCOURSE MUST BE THE COMMONS NOT THE INDIVIDUAL. Law is for individuals. Individuals must be able to act in their interests, limited by the prohibition on parasitism. But policy must exist for the production of commons that perpetuates the family, kin, tribe, and nation, or else it is just a lie to justify conquest. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • A Very New Cut On Intellectual History

    (draft) [S]o Zoroastrianism was constructed to divide the Persians and indians who were both southern indo european peoples. Then the Talmud was constructed as a lie to justify retention of property after the end of the babylonian conquest. THE REVOLUTION The greeks invent reason, truth, science, politics for the management of people at scale. The Romans, seeing the ‘verbalism’ (immorality) of the greeks, resist greek idealism and embrace practical and empirical means. THE RESISTANCE BY DECEIT Then judaism evolved as a means by which to justify parasitism upon host civilizations while maintaining group cohesion. Then christianity was constructed as a rebellion against the empire, that had deprived primitive people of their local status signals. Then the bible was constructed to manage the hordes through false promise now that production by slavery was no longer possible. Then the koran was constructed to unite the tribes and conquer the peninsula (and then the exhausted Byzantines and Sassanids, and North Africa, and then Spain. ) THE FAILURES AT RESTORATION The Carolingians failed to construct an economic and political order. although the trade routes from Italy to the Netherlands and then to the north sea peoples created incremental organic evolution. The Templars created the legal and credit system and were destroyed by the authoritarian church who was their debtor. The Hansa recreated the legal, credit, and trade system. But were out-competed by the territorial powers that largely adopted their methods. The development of the new world and colonies allowed the financing of the transition of the west to economic modernity. (despite that there was little long term benefit to western nations, and strangely enough quite a considerable benefit to colonies depending upon who colonized them.) THE RESTORATION OF TRUTH Then the anglos responded with the enlightenment, empiricism, and the restoration of truth (science). The french responded with … rousseuan pseudoscience and pseudo morality, as a means of creating the terror, and attempting to unify all of europe under their despotism. The germans respond with restating christian mysticism as kantian rationalism. And create a new vehicle for obscurantism. The Jews responded by converting the hansa/templar system to their advantage in the territorial wars between Britain and France (Napoleonic wars) creating the Rothschild and consequent systems of order creation by using our own capital stock and lending it back to us. Westerners responded with the nation-state, an attempt to construct professional bureaucracy, the gold standard, empire and the industrial revolution. Most importantly, american constitution and it’s somewhat failed attempt at natural law expressed as a formal logic of cooperation. Jews responded with an attack on the academy and polity by creating the great pseudosciences: Boazian Sociology, Marxist Economics and Politics, Freudian Psychology. All of which were constructed to universalize separatist judaism or justify hosting jewish separatism despite it’s parasitisms. This merely taking the argumentatitve innovations of the french and germans combining them with the same obscurantist ‘preaching’ technique used to distribute Christianity, except now using the power of the printing press. BRANCH : We branch now into various evolutions upon this new religion – faster innovation in the technologies of truth and falsehood. Branch 1 – Jewish Then the second wave: Popperian philsophy, Misesian Economics, Randian/Rothbardian Libertinism. (the half-failure/half-success) Then the third wave: straussian neo-conservativsm and expansionary militarism of the ‘new rome’. (the madness of power) Branch 2 – Neo Puritan Then the adoption of Keyneisan Economics as the new innumerate pseudoscience. and Rawlsian Ethics as the pseudo morality. Then the adoption of postmodern philosophy in academia. THE FAILED REACTION Mises in economics, Brouwer in Mathematics, Bridgman in Physics (science), Popper in philosophy, A HOST of authors in Law. And a total catastrophic absence in Politics since majoritarianism was still influential everywhere. RESTORATION: Science catches up with the deceit and starts to disprove it. The various cognitive scientists, and neurologists, are largely responsible for our reframing of jewish monopoly conformity to western distribution of talents and abilities. EO Wilson states that a synthesis of biology, morality, politics and economics – all the sciences – should be possible. Archaeologists and historians and evolutionary biologists in our social orders. Haidt, the empirical psychologists, and the anthropologists in the evolution of cooperation. SYNTHESIS Doolittle in Economics, Politics, Ethics, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology and Metaphysics. In retrospect this is my view of the evolution of history as a competition between the different european tribes, most of which practice morality and one of which practices immorality. And the reason being that if we hold land we can construct moral rules because we must in order to create the commons of land holding. A parasitic people that does not need or cannot hold land need not create commons because they can use the host’s. THE CENTRAL SUBJECT OF OUR DISCOURSE MUST BE THE COMMONS NOT THE INDIVIDUAL. Law is for individuals. Individuals must be able to act in their interests, limited by the prohibition on parasitism. But policy must exist for the production of commons that perpetuates the family, kin, tribe, and nation, or else it is just a lie to justify conquest. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Talmud was invented to steal. The Bible to enslave. The Koran to deceive. Th

    The Talmud was invented to steal.

    The Bible to enslave.

    The Koran to deceive.

    The Truth to free us from all three.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 07:39:00 UTC

  • THE CHALLENGE OF OUR TIME IS DECEIT. We spend a lot of time on logical fallacies

    THE CHALLENGE OF OUR TIME IS DECEIT.

    We spend a lot of time on logical fallacies, which assume mere error on the part of one’s opponent.

    We have begun to spend a lot of time on Cognitive Biases which affect one’s opponent.

    But both of these disciplines assume that the other party errs. When the problem of modern era, is not error but deception: lying.

    Social Pseudoscience, Keynesian Pseudoscience, postmodernism, rationalist obscurantism, propaganda and overloading, rallying and shaming, feminism, political correctness, religion and mysticism, democratic secular humanism (a pseudoscientific religion).

    All of these are possible not by error, not by bias, but by the organized use of language and media as a means of conducting theft by deception.

    The problem of our time is DECEPTION. How do we cleanse the commons of deceit?

    That’s why I work on Testimonialism (truth telling) and propertarianism (limits of human action) and propertarian liberalism (the market construction of commons.)

    End the century of lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-14 03:45:00 UTC

  • Classification by Advertising Rather Than Content

    [W]e have this tragic categorial bias in the west wherein we classify religions by their advertising rather than their content.

  • Classification by Advertising Rather Than Content

    [W]e have this tragic categorial bias in the west wherein we classify religions by their advertising rather than their content.

  • Is it me, or is it truth that libertines are more dishonest in debate than conse

    Is it me, or is it truth that libertines are more dishonest in debate than conservatives, but less dishonest than progressives?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-13 12:39:00 UTC

  • Strategy: If We Eliminate The Parasitic, Only Liberty Remains

    (worth repeating) [R]emove all choice, so that only Liberty Remains, just as by removing all choice, only the market remains.

    “If we make it just as difficult to deceive, lie cheat, free ride and privatize as we have made it difficult to steal physical property, then liberty will result from it. Because all those things that prohibit liberty are matters of theft of one kind or another. So instead of advocating liberty as a way of producing liberty, I’m trying to outlaw everything else so that only liberty remains.”—Curt Doolittle

    We pacify man by the incremental suppression and if necessary, extermination, of parasitism.