Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Compare American and Russian falsehoods.

    [D]OMESTICATION 1) The american revolution was an attempt to escape paying for the french and indian war that nearly bankrupted the crown. VS the Russian myth of the nazis was an excuse to conquer more territory, and Russian occupation of eastern Europe set them back a century of development. The germans would have advanced eastern Europe, and probably the world. 2) the american civil war was not so much about slavery but the expansion of slavery into the western territories, and therefore the shift in political power from the north to the south. VS The cult of soviet, the cult of lenin, the pride in recent history. As far as we know the tzars had created both unions and a parliamentary equivalent. And with time could have reached european standards of living. Instead the soviets murdered 100M people. The experiment was a fucking disaster, and Russia, China, and even India cannot recover from Russian legal codes. (omg don’g let me talk about Ukraine). 3) the americans spread the cancer of democracy – a luxury good for small homogenous nations that is the result of extreme domestication of the population. This is because they argue falsely that democracy is the source of western prosperity,m rather than that rule of law and suppression of the reproduction of the lower classes through the use of the nuclear family, rule of law, and property rights. Russians spread communism as an excuse to expand their conquests of asia around the world. Why russians need political power when they have the best resources in the world, is beyond me. 4) Regan attacked Grenada for the same reason Putin attacked ukraine and syria: to restore national pride, and to distract the population from the economy, and to collect political power. WHAT DO I RECOMMEND? Russians move south and conquer the ‘problem people’ Chinese move south and conquer the ‘problem people’ Europeans move south and conquer the ‘problem people’ Americans go home and mind their own fucking business. AND NOBODY MOVES EAST OR WEST We have a lot of the world remaining to domesticate.

  • Confidence in Ignorance

    CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE (you see this kind of stupidity from the left and their followers, the muslims)

    —If socialism is the next stage of human society, why bother fighting for it?—

    Socialism is impossible. It cannot be the next stage of human society. So the question is not meaningful.

    –But look at this quote: “…….”—- (moronic sophist drivel that conflates economic and political models, ie: verbalisms.)

    Definitions: Socialism: the involuntary organization of investment, production, distribution, and trade and the absence of rational incentives. Capitalism: the voluntary organization of investment, production,m distribution and trade, and the presence of rational incentives. “Mixed Economy“: the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade, and a ‘fee’ collected by the government for use in the production of commons by legislative means. Rule of Law: the market economy in which all actions must be voluntary, fully informed, productive, and free of negative externality Democracy: (economic or unitary) the selection of legislation by majority rule. Republic: the selection of representatives who determine legislative outputs by majority rule as proxy for citizens. Totalitarianism: the choice of commands at the discretion of some elite. So whomever is writing what you quote is a very ignorant person. I have another question: Why do you think you are either smart enough or knowledgeable enough to discuss these topics, and hold an opinion on these topics? This is the interesting question.

  • Confidence in Ignorance

    CONFIDENCE IN THEIR IGNORANCE (you see this kind of stupidity from the left and their followers, the muslims)

    —If socialism is the next stage of human society, why bother fighting for it?—

    Socialism is impossible. It cannot be the next stage of human society. So the question is not meaningful.

    –But look at this quote: “…….”—- (moronic sophist drivel that conflates economic and political models, ie: verbalisms.)

    Definitions: Socialism: the involuntary organization of investment, production, distribution, and trade and the absence of rational incentives. Capitalism: the voluntary organization of investment, production,m distribution and trade, and the presence of rational incentives. “Mixed Economy“: the voluntary organization of production distribution and trade, and a ‘fee’ collected by the government for use in the production of commons by legislative means. Rule of Law: the market economy in which all actions must be voluntary, fully informed, productive, and free of negative externality Democracy: (economic or unitary) the selection of legislation by majority rule. Republic: the selection of representatives who determine legislative outputs by majority rule as proxy for citizens. Totalitarianism: the choice of commands at the discretion of some elite. So whomever is writing what you quote is a very ignorant person. I have another question: Why do you think you are either smart enough or knowledgeable enough to discuss these topics, and hold an opinion on these topics? This is the interesting question.

  • Suggestion both Informs and Deceives

    WE ARE BOTH INFORMED AND DECEIVED BY SUGGESTION [W]e should not be surprised, if experience is transferred by the process of using names of properties by means of suggestion, that those who would master deception would do so by the same process of suggestion. Meaning, that one can seek to inform or to deceive by the same means. And that some of us should specialize in the suggestion of truth, some in the suggestion of honesty, some in the suggestion of error, and some in the suggestion of falsehood, should not surprise us. What should surprise us is how willingly susceptible to suggestion we humans are if suggestion confirms our natural cognitive or moral biases. Nor should it surprise us if others develop specialization in suggestions that invoke our moral biases.

  • Suggestion both Informs and Deceives

    WE ARE BOTH INFORMED AND DECEIVED BY SUGGESTION [W]e should not be surprised, if experience is transferred by the process of using names of properties by means of suggestion, that those who would master deception would do so by the same process of suggestion. Meaning, that one can seek to inform or to deceive by the same means. And that some of us should specialize in the suggestion of truth, some in the suggestion of honesty, some in the suggestion of error, and some in the suggestion of falsehood, should not surprise us. What should surprise us is how willingly susceptible to suggestion we humans are if suggestion confirms our natural cognitive or moral biases. Nor should it surprise us if others develop specialization in suggestions that invoke our moral biases.

  • THE PROBLEM OF CONFLATIONARY LITERATURE 1) Testimony –> Science -> LITERATURE <

    THE PROBLEM OF CONFLATIONARY LITERATURE

    1) Testimony –> Science -> LITERATURE <– Propaganda <— Lie

    2) Quality, Meritocracy, Eugenia –> <– Dysgenia, Mediocracy, Quantity

    3) (Aristotelians) Evolution –> <— Devolution (Muslims)

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-24 02:52:00 UTC

  • The Left Lies

    The Left Lies. https://twitter.com/reason/status/723486015994785792

  • Interesting. Why can’t we outlaw virtue signaling as a form of theft?

    Interesting.

    Why can’t we outlaw virtue signaling as a form of theft?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-22 11:48:00 UTC

  • Left Lies

    https://t.co/LlIVGPpfTGThe Left Lies.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-22 08:18:00 UTC

  • So either you do not understand enough to criticize, you err, or you deceive

    So either you do not understand enough to criticize, you err, or you deceive.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-04-21 15:06:13 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/723165952464982016

    Reply addressees: @Clausfarre143 @_AltRight_

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/723156388717973505

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/723156388717973505