@weeklystandard No more errors, biases, wishful thinking, economic ‘selective-accounting’, pseudoscience, suggestion, and deceit. #NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 10:18:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725630224801644544
Theme: Deception
-
@weeklystandard Neocons, Libertarians, Marxists: all pseudoscientific falsehoods
@weeklystandard Neocons, Libertarians, Marxists: all pseudoscientific falsehoods propagated by pseudo intellectuals using new media:CHANTING
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 10:04:42 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725626790249684992
-
@weeklystandard Personalizing our movement is but an attempt to avoid addressing
@weeklystandard Personalizing our movement is but an attempt to avoid addressing our challenge: You failed. And harmed us doing so.#NewRight
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 09:58:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725625334809374720
-
@weeklystandard Your current deception, in your usual method, is to PERSONALIZE
@weeklystandard Your current deception, in your usual method, is to PERSONALIZE our rejection of the status quo, as marxists PSYCHOLOGIZE.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 09:57:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725624952074997760
-
@weeklystandard You failed because you erred or lied, or both. Our mandate is to
@weeklystandard You failed because you erred or lied, or both. Our mandate is to speak truthfully, morally, empirically. Truth is enough.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 09:54:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725624156864274432
-
We are the #NewRight.Because we will end the century of lies. End the myth of de
We are the #NewRight.Because we will end the century of lies. End the myth of democracy.End the myth of equality. No more lies.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 06:27:03 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725572015256653824
Reply addressees: @BillKristol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725290299581448192
IN REPLY TO:
@BillKristol
Conservatives once stood athwart History, yelling Stop. And trying to change the course of history, against the odds. They had courage then.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725290299581448192
-
Ergo, under democracy, conservatives lied by omission.Since truth is the source
Ergo, under democracy, conservatives lied by omission.Since truth is the source of conservatism, it could not survive.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 06:12:31 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725568356674318336
Reply addressees: @BillKristol
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725290299581448192
IN REPLY TO:
@BillKristol
Conservatives once stood athwart History, yelling Stop. And trying to change the course of history, against the odds. They had courage then.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725290299581448192
-
INTRODUCTION TO “MASKIROVA” (DECEPTION)
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-31020283GREAT INTRODUCTION TO “MASKIROVA” (DECEPTION)
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-28 05:08:00 UTC
-
Rhetorical avoidance
Rhetorical avoidance.
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 20:00:55 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725052054566256641
Reply addressees: @mikkonou @SarasvuoJari @HKolehmainen @TuomasEnbuske @filsdeproust @Maliranta @soalmila @GadSaad @AnaSwanson
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725044900010536960
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/725044900010536960
-
THE METHOD OF SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION —” the drift away from constituti
THE METHOD OF SUBVERSION OF THE CONSTITUTION
—” the drift away from constitutional legitimacy is not just the result of incompetence or confusion. There is a faction which has tended to dominate the federal government, especially during most of the 20th century, which has deliberately sought to extend precedents beyond the bounds of original constitutional understanding. It has done this by carefully selecting cases against weak or inadequately represented defendants, appealing only those cases they are sure they will win, and framing the arguments so that the judges often don’t have a choice that is constitutional, but must choose between two unconstitutional positions. Ordinarily this is supposed to be guarded against by constitutionally protective parties filing amicus curiae briefs to argue a strict constructionist position, but such briefs are not always filed in important cases, or are often ignored by the court.”—
Source date (UTC): 2016-04-26 06:26:00 UTC