Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • @peterthiel Thank you for all you do. Thank you even more for the public service

    @peterthiel Thank you for all you do. Thank you even more for the public service of protecting us from malicious ‘journalists’. -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 07:29:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735734689432932352

  • Wrong people in journalism today. Cognitive bias for false consensus. Future is

    Wrong people in journalism today. Cognitive bias for false consensus. Future is in covering all political POV, and falsifying.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 06:52:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735725244640415744

    Reply addressees: @brianstelter

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735706835349471232

    IN REPLY TO:

    @brianstelter

    Warren Buffett’s bleak view of his beloved newspaper biz: “We haven’t cracked the code yet…” https://t.co/X1F7miA6sv

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/735706835349471232

  • You call it political correctness, and we call it lying. #NewRight

    You call it political correctness, and we call it lying. #NewRight

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-26 04:09:00 UTC

  • THIS ARTICLE A DISINGENUOUS JOURNALISTIC JUSTIFICATIONISM WITH A HEAVY DOSE OF P

    http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/article79165287.html#fmpIS THIS ARTICLE A DISINGENUOUS JOURNALISTIC JUSTIFICATIONISM WITH A HEAVY DOSE OF PSYCHOLOGISM THROWN IN FOR EXTRA MEASURE?

    People don’t like or trust the Clintons

    1) Hillary-care vs Obama-care. We still hold her responsible for the first failure as much as we will soon hold Obama accountable for the second: imposing controls on our largest industry against the will of the voters.

    2) Clinton-era devolution of the military. Against the will of the voters.

    3) Dead Soldiers. Did we say “Dead Soldiers?” Did we say lying about dead soldiers? Against the will of the voters.

    4) The Clinton Foundation’s behavior. (I have personal experience – they lied and stole 2M from my company)

    5) Tolerating a husband’s serial-sex-predator problems. And not honestly addressing it.

    6) “More of the Same Policy” instead of the end of empire-under-the-rubric of-globalism.

    7) Racial and Minority Pandering in an era where the parties represent racial divides.

    8) The most scandalous presidency on record – and she covered for it.

    9) Taking credit for 1990’s economy which was entirely the result of the end of world socialism and the universal adoption of consumer capitalism.

    10) Did we say ‘flagrant disregard for the rule of law, and a failure to come clean, apologize, and correct the behavior”.

    11) Total absence of any creativity, innovation, policy, to address the current world and domestic stresses.

    12) The backing of wall street, which is no longer providing a necessary function of distributing physical currency, or marshaling hard-money-credit in an economy of digital currency created from the issuance of shares in the economy: what we call fiat money.

    13) The boomers killed america. She’s a typical lower middle class boomer social climber, and she bears every unlikeable property of her generation.

    Our rule of law is sacred. Our Truthfulness in speech is sacred. Our military and our soldiers are sacred. Our marriages and our families are sacred. And the presidency functions as the sacred moral steward of the country. But, what does sacred mean? It means that no matter what good we wish to achieve in private or the commons we may not violate those rules in achieving it – because our ability to create those commons

    She has no respect for the sacred. And so we have no respect for her.

    She’s a professional pandering, Boomer politician. A product of the postmodern anti-scientific, ant-rational, anti-moral generation.

    She represents all that is sick with our nation.

    Of course she is not trusted, disliked, and by some, openly despised.

    Because she’s deserving of it.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-24 05:23:00 UTC

  • PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS Sinic (Eastern) : Basis of Sinic philosophy is Sun Tzu: Dece

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-key-differences-in-business-culture-between-Western-and-Eastern/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=fa2e63d0EASTERN PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS

    Sinic (Eastern) :

    Basis of Sinic philosophy is Sun Tzu: Deception and delay until opportunity to defeat. We are strongest when we have total control, and cannot be victimized by the other, and no longer need to compromise.

    Falsehood is expected.

    Preserve Face, avoiding offense.

    Information Hiding, is expected.

    Self benefit rather than symmetric benefit is not only expected but desirable.

    Decisions are made outside the room by those in authority.

    Agreements are temporarily useful for the moment, but open to revision and circumstance at all times.

    Differences are to be hidden until they can be used to produce asymmetric benefits.

    Disagreements are to be used as opportunities for asymmetric benefits.

    Corruption is expected and even ‘understood’.

    Asymmetric benefit is expected and ‘understood’

    Non Performance is expected, and ‘understood’.

    Changing the terms of the agreement is expected and ‘understood’.

    WESTERN PHILOSOPHICAL BASIS

    Germanic (Western):

    Basis of western philosophy is Aristotle: Truth, transparency, and cooperation leading to mutual benefit – we are strongest when we cooperate together, and we preserve our cooperation through constant compromise.

    Truth, even if unpleasant.

    Directness, even if offensive.

    Information transparency, even if disadvantageous.

    Objective is mutual benefit – and non parasitism, developing long term trust.

    Decisions are made in the room between the negotiators.

    Agreements are binding contracts not subject to revision or circumstance, even if risky.

    Resolve differences quickly, and move on.

    Disagreements must result in mutually beneficial compromise.

    Corruption is inexcusable.

    Asymmetric benefit is inexcusable.

    Non performance is inexcusable.

    Changing the terms of the agreement is inexcusable.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-22 07:12:00 UTC

  • What Are The Key Differences In Business Culture Between Western And Eastern?

    Sinic (Eastern) :

    Basis of Sinic philosophy is Sun Tzu: Deception and delay until opportunity to defeat. We are strongest when we have total control, and cannot be victimized by the other, and no longer need to compromise.

    Falsehood is expected.
    Preserve Face, avoiding offense.
    Information Hiding, is expected.
    Self benefit rather than symmetric benefit is not only expected but desirable.
    Decisions are made outside the room by those in authority.
    Agreements are temporarily useful for the moment, but open to revision and circumstance at all times.
    Differences are to be hidden until they can be used to produce asymmetric benefits.
    Disagreements are to be used as opportunities for asymmetric benefits.

    Corruption is expected and even ‘understood’.
    Asymmetric benefit is expected and ‘understood’
    Non Performance is expected, and ‘understood’.
    Changing the terms of the agreement is expected and ‘understood’.

    Germanic (Western):
    Basis of western philosophy is Aristotle: Truth, transparency, and cooperation leading to mutual benefit – we are strongest when we cooperate together, and we preserve our cooperation through constant compromise.

    Truth, even if unpleasant.
    Directness, even if offensive.
    Information transparency, even if disadvantageous.
    Objective is mutual benefit – and non parasitism, developing long term trust.
    Decisions are made in the room between the negotiators.
    Agreements are binding contracts not subject to revision or circumstance, even if risky.
    Resolve differences quickly, and move on.
    Disagreements must result in mutually beneficial compromise.

    Corruption is inexcusable.
    Asymmetric benefit is inexcusable.
    Non performance is inexcusable.
    Changing the terms of the agreement is inexcusable.

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-key-differences-in-business-culture-between-Western-and-Eastern

  • What Are The Key Differences In Business Culture Between Western And Eastern?

    Sinic (Eastern) :

    Basis of Sinic philosophy is Sun Tzu: Deception and delay until opportunity to defeat. We are strongest when we have total control, and cannot be victimized by the other, and no longer need to compromise.

    Falsehood is expected.
    Preserve Face, avoiding offense.
    Information Hiding, is expected.
    Self benefit rather than symmetric benefit is not only expected but desirable.
    Decisions are made outside the room by those in authority.
    Agreements are temporarily useful for the moment, but open to revision and circumstance at all times.
    Differences are to be hidden until they can be used to produce asymmetric benefits.
    Disagreements are to be used as opportunities for asymmetric benefits.

    Corruption is expected and even ‘understood’.
    Asymmetric benefit is expected and ‘understood’
    Non Performance is expected, and ‘understood’.
    Changing the terms of the agreement is expected and ‘understood’.

    Germanic (Western):
    Basis of western philosophy is Aristotle: Truth, transparency, and cooperation leading to mutual benefit – we are strongest when we cooperate together, and we preserve our cooperation through constant compromise.

    Truth, even if unpleasant.
    Directness, even if offensive.
    Information transparency, even if disadvantageous.
    Objective is mutual benefit – and non parasitism, developing long term trust.
    Decisions are made in the room between the negotiators.
    Agreements are binding contracts not subject to revision or circumstance, even if risky.
    Resolve differences quickly, and move on.
    Disagreements must result in mutually beneficial compromise.

    Corruption is inexcusable.
    Asymmetric benefit is inexcusable.
    Non performance is inexcusable.
    Changing the terms of the agreement is inexcusable.

    https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-key-differences-in-business-culture-between-Western-and-Eastern

  • ‘The Mouth Belongs To Clinton, The Voice Belongs To Soros’

    —‘The Mouth Belongs To Clinton, The Voice Belongs To Soros’—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-21 01:35:00 UTC

  • DISBARS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES HE CAN, AND SENDS THE REST TO ETHICS CLASSE

    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/judge-orders-ethics-classes-for-deceptive-justice-dept.-attorneys/article/2591815JUDGE DISBARS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES HE CAN, AND SENDS THE REST TO ETHICS CLASSES

    —LIARS ALL—

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-20 05:13:00 UTC

  • MY CLINTON FOUNDATION STORY We were asked to rescue a large project ‘funded’ by

    MY CLINTON FOUNDATION STORY

    We were asked to rescue a large project ‘funded’ by the clinton foundation, Microsoft, and the originators of the Greenhouse Gas movement.

    This project was ostensively managed by the person at Microsoft who was responsible for their advocacy of green ideas. (a man).

    This fellow used our ‘reciprocal’ relationship with Microsoft (our trust) to run up a $2M debt, by promising that he would ‘get the PO for the new funds, soon’. (Note that when you do many tens of millions of dollars with a client for decades, this is not an uncommon practice. Why? Because people cost money when they sit, cost more money to recruit again, so it’s better work on spec and help customers move paperwork thru their bureaucracies.)

    Now, it turns out that the clinton foundation had promised to split the costs with Microsoft, but never actually had any of the money. We found out that they’d hoped to guilt Microsoft into ‘donating’ to the cause, or experience negative press for not doing so. (Entrapping them.) Autodesk had suggested they might contribute if the project was a success and their tech was used in it. But this was represented to all parties as money in the bank.

    Now, I’m not going to get into how many high-fliers were involved in these discussions (Murdoch’s wife, various Clintonistas, people from Adobe, nearly everyone in the three central political players in the global warming movement, but you know, this wasn’t magic money. This was my money and my partner’s money we were dealing with. but everyone at the table was lying.) So I took the hard drives, backed them up, and put it all in a safe deposit box, until Microsoft legal asked us to give it to them. At which point it was dead tech. )

    This is about 1% of the information I could write down but you get the general idea. This is how these people work.

    And we were $2M poorer. I also spent an additional 200K+ of my own money trying to rescue it for the Global Warming people despite the fact that I actually opposed the state of the science. And I lost that because one of the people involved lied to me about his access to capital as well. What happened? Remember that November when it came out that the science was faked? That was our third month of operation on behalf of the Global Warming folks.

    So my view of the clinton organization is that it’s just another bunch of hacks trading political favors. My view of global warming / climate movement is colored by my knowledge of the players. My view of corporations is that they should stay out of the freaking sentimental business anyway, and do good by making and distributing profits, while doing no harm.

    Source date (UTC): 2016-05-20 05:07:00 UTC