Theme: Deception

  • “Why Communism is Seductive” by @whatifalthist THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNI

    “Why Communism is Seductive”
    https://t.co/tTGF5YygYB
    by @whatifalthist

    THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM
    I’ll add that the entirety of the left has but one strategy – the female strategy – of seduction into authoritarianism and the promise of irresponsibility, non-competition, non-conflict by the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: the formal (truth), the physical (scarcity), the behavioral (self interest), and the evolutionary (mutation, load, classes, natural selection). The female and feminine and effeminate intuition is that of a child: the search for parental provision on one hand, or the search by a mother for authoritarian control over her children.
    One does not need to be female, feminine, or effeminate to be attracted to the female means of seduction. One needs to be seeking irresponsibility in a world of low trust people doing the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:55:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672196769965391873

  • “Why Communism is Seductive” THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM I’ll add that t

    “Why Communism is Seductive”
    https://t.co/tTGF5YygYB

    THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM
    I’ll add that the entirety of the left has but one strategy – the female strategy – of seduction into authoritarianism and the promise of irresponsibility, non-competition, non-conflict by the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: the formal (truth), the physical (scarcity), the behavioral (self interest), and the evolutionary (mutation, load, classes, natural selection). The female and feminine and effeminate intuition is that of a child: the search for parental provision on one hand, or the search by a mother for authoritarian control over her children.
    One does not need to be female, feminine, or effeminate to be attracted to the female means of seduction. One needs to be seeking irresponsibility in a world of low trust people doing the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:55:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672196588146442241

  • “Why Communism is Seductive” THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM I’ll add that t

    “Why Communism is Seductive” https://t.co/tTGF5YygYB

    THE FEMININE INSTINCT AND COMMUNISM
    I’ll add that the entirety of the left has but one strategy – the female strategy – of seduction into authoritarianism and the promise of irresponsibility, non-competition, non-conflict by the false promise of freedom from the laws of the universe: the formal (truth), the physical (scarcity), the behavioral (self interest), and the evolutionary (mutation, load, classes, natural selection). The female and feminine and effeminate intuition is that of a child: the search for parental provision on one hand, or the search by a mother for authoritarian control over her children.
    One does not need to be female, feminine, or effeminate to be attracted to the female means of seduction. One needs to be seeking irresponsibility in a world of low trust people doing the same.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-23 10:54:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1672196517891801092

  • “the botched who have always existed became the elite”– Correct. Though I would

    –“the botched who have always existed became the elite”–

    Correct.

    Though I would say the problem with the pseudo-elite just like pervasive behavioral pseudoscience was created knowingly and intentionally by ‘Credentialists’ who lacked loyalty to the country, meritocracy, empiricism, and rule of law, and made possible by the demand generated for them by the expansion of the State, in competition with the slow progress of developing natural elites and natural aristocracy with loyalty to the country.

    There were still meritocratic people in academy and government as late as 1960, but the ‘activists’ ended the elite academy and government with their intentional ‘march through the institutions of cultural production beginning with education’.

    Read Gramsci. Read Adorno et al. Read Friere. Destruction by design.

    Reply addressees: @William68332190 @NorseJarl @TheAutistocrat @EPoe187


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-22 17:36:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671935149129302040

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671932897681457167

  • RT @NoahRevoy: @William68332190 @ThruTheHayes @curtdoolittle @jordanbpeterson Al

    RT @NoahRevoy: @William68332190 @ThruTheHayes @curtdoolittle @jordanbpeterson Also, we have a counterfeit priest class pushing a deadly fal…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-22 17:36:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671935094515269641

  • And, yes, I am an expert in these differences and their civilizational differenc

    And, yes, I am an expert in these differences and their civilizational differences in expression. In particular, I’ve done the primary research on the sex differences in lying and their origin in sex differences in cognitive bias. Especially female predictive empathizing and neuroticism (prey) vs make predictive systematizing (predator) biases. This work was possible by work on universal grammar and the spectrum of grammars from testimony to deception to sedition. And the work on grammars was the result of solving the problem of performative truth. And the origin of the testable dimensions of testimony in biological faculties.
    Attached is a link to some of the quick reference materials I often share with students.
    https://t.co/Roz7Q1kIZ1

    And so, I know with painful detail what I’m talking about, or I wouldn’t make any assertions whatsoever.

    Reply addressees: @coffeecatharine @emilymcclements @RealCandaceO


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 23:53:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671667570963894272

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671665587943276544

  • example of feminine use of special pleading by claims of relativism reliant on p

    example of feminine use of special pleading by claims of relativism reliant on pretense of knowledge, in the absence of the evidence or even study of it.

    No. I’m correct sorry. We have known for over a century that men develop a systemic worldview earlier, and since the 1950s that men are more politically and economically informed, (as in all systems) and make policy decisions that defend the capital of the commons – while only a few married women with children do, and the rest of women largely vote by emotion in ignorance. I don’t have the stats here but the number of women who voted for obama and clinton because they were attractive was terrifying.

    Without women voters none of the undermining of rule of law would have occurred., and we wouldn’t have had a left leaning president.

    Reply addressees: @coffeecatharine @emilymcclements @RealCandaceO


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 23:21:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671659589660557312

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671657766438711296

  • Most evenings, after dinner, I read a random selection of posts in a number of r

    Most evenings, after dinner, I read a random selection of posts in a number of russian language telegram channels. Mostly for the laughs. And while the american left makes up oppression nonsense and lies, and the american right dreams up conspiracies of all sorts, the russians are clearly far better at both and frankly they’re more creative, more ridiculous, of greater scale, more sincere, and more entertaining. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 23:16:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671658446200946691

  • RT @elonmusk: @snopes You can’t even run a good psy op

    RT @elonmusk: @snopes You can’t even run a good psy op


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 18:12:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671581983711821824

  • Intellectual diversity requires lying. Scientific competition requires testifiab

    Intellectual diversity requires lying.
    Scientific competition requires testifiability.
    The liars search for the good at the expense of the true – and create decline and dysgenia.
    The testifiers search from the true and construct construct the good by eliminating the bad.
    This is the difference between philosophical and theological justification, and scientific and logical falsification.
    The good is produced by the eradication of the false, irreciprocal, and bad.
    Thus incentivizing the good.
    All else, all lies of convienicnce, conviction, and care do nothing but incentivize the irresponsible, decadent, bad, declining, and dysgenic.
    That’s what science means.
    That’s why science succeeded.
    Intellectual diversity is just another term for dialectic: Lying.
    Period.
    End of story.
    And there is no thinker live or dead nor will there ever be, who can or will falsify those statements.
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    Reply addressees: @EPoe187 @AporiaMagazine


    Source date (UTC): 2023-06-21 17:07:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671565571693981696

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1671164210867482624