Theme: Deception

  • So now you are moving from straw men, to distraction, to deception?

    So now you are moving from straw men, to distraction, to deception?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 19:07:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768162648789618688

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768162037339795456


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768162037339795456

  • First, I am sure I (as well as any observer) understand that you’re admitting de

    First, I am sure I (as well as any observer) understand that you’re admitting defeat on truth, and switching, to avoid it…


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 18:17:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768150299374718976

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768114061615570946


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768114061615570946

  • (as far as I know there is nothing unchristian about my arguments, and my critic

    (as far as I know there is nothing unchristian about my arguments, and my criticism of Christianity is limited to the use of falsehoods, and demand for submission. )


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 13:27:00 UTC

  • well this is the point, you are claiming authority where you have none, and I am

    well this is the point, you are claiming authority where you have none, and I am doubting you rather than allowing deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:35:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768064107643895808

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768063915536199681


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768063915536199681

  • So do you misunderstand, are you creating a straw man by accident, or on purpose

    So do you misunderstand, are you creating a straw man by accident, or on purpose?


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:16:01 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768059215579611141

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257

  • So see, you THINK you know something about truth, but you have just managed to h

    So see, you THINK you know something about truth, but you have just managed to habituate erroneous convention.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 12:04:30 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768056317747527680

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055481336160257

  • To claim a proof equal to a truth is simply an act of error or deciet. In your c

    To claim a proof equal to a truth is simply an act of error or deciet. In your case I know now it’s justificationary authority


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 11:59:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768055125323677697

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768054836231180288


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768054836231180288

  • so if we combine ludic fallacy, justification, circumvention of accountability,

    so if we combine ludic fallacy, justification, circumvention of accountability, then we have perfect tools for deception.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-08-23 11:47:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/768051923849244672

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767973853712687104


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/767973853712687104

  • Likelihood vs. Frequency

    [M]any people conflate likelihood with frequency. For example, they point out how infrequent Muslim terror attacks are and they make fun of you for even mentioning such an unlikely possibility. There are far more likely ways for you to die, car accident, petty crime, cancer, heart disease, etc… etc… So why are you worried about Islamic terrorism? You’re just an old fuddy duddy, and probably a bigot. But the likelihood of Muslim terror attacks is not in question. We know now for a certainty that as long as Muslims and westerners continue to mix and mingle, a small but significant minority of Muslims will attack western governments, infrastructure, military, and civilians (but especially civilians) with the aim of inflicting as many casualties or as much damage as possible. Unless something changes, however, those attacks will remain infrequent enough that you probably won’t be caught up in one. But something IS changing, the number and proportion of Muslims in western nations is changing. The number and proportion of Muslims in western counties is increasing. The ONLY reason anyone mentions the infrequency of their terror attacks (under the duplicitous guise of unlikeliness) is to JUSTIFY increasing their numbers still further. And so the frequency of attacks will rise. And your likelihood of dying or being maimed in one will rise with it. And if the number and proportion of Muslims in western nations keeps increasing, they will eventually have options other than to engage in random attacks with a near certainty of being caught or killed themselves. There will be other objects within their reach, supremacy, rule, subjugation, victory. And we can be just as certain that they will reach for those as we are certain now that they will continue to attack us, because that is their aim. They have said so. This is what those who sow this confusion advocate. This is what those who peddle this lie demand. They have CHOSEN treason to the west and its destruction of their own free will and they have had every reason and opportunity to KNOW that this is what they were choosing. Whether the west prevails, or Islam, their fate is sealed; unless they repent of their lies and make good the damage they have wrought. REPOSTED FROM: Eli Harman https://hyperborial.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/likelihood-vs-frequency/

  • Likelihood vs. Frequency

    [M]any people conflate likelihood with frequency. For example, they point out how infrequent Muslim terror attacks are and they make fun of you for even mentioning such an unlikely possibility. There are far more likely ways for you to die, car accident, petty crime, cancer, heart disease, etc… etc… So why are you worried about Islamic terrorism? You’re just an old fuddy duddy, and probably a bigot. But the likelihood of Muslim terror attacks is not in question. We know now for a certainty that as long as Muslims and westerners continue to mix and mingle, a small but significant minority of Muslims will attack western governments, infrastructure, military, and civilians (but especially civilians) with the aim of inflicting as many casualties or as much damage as possible. Unless something changes, however, those attacks will remain infrequent enough that you probably won’t be caught up in one. But something IS changing, the number and proportion of Muslims in western nations is changing. The number and proportion of Muslims in western counties is increasing. The ONLY reason anyone mentions the infrequency of their terror attacks (under the duplicitous guise of unlikeliness) is to JUSTIFY increasing their numbers still further. And so the frequency of attacks will rise. And your likelihood of dying or being maimed in one will rise with it. And if the number and proportion of Muslims in western nations keeps increasing, they will eventually have options other than to engage in random attacks with a near certainty of being caught or killed themselves. There will be other objects within their reach, supremacy, rule, subjugation, victory. And we can be just as certain that they will reach for those as we are certain now that they will continue to attack us, because that is their aim. They have said so. This is what those who sow this confusion advocate. This is what those who peddle this lie demand. They have CHOSEN treason to the west and its destruction of their own free will and they have had every reason and opportunity to KNOW that this is what they were choosing. Whether the west prevails, or Islam, their fate is sealed; unless they repent of their lies and make good the damage they have wrought. REPOSTED FROM: Eli Harman https://hyperborial.wordpress.com/2016/08/21/likelihood-vs-frequency/