Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • Same for all works of religion, ideology, philosophy: its fantasy moral literatu

    Same for all works of religion, ideology, philosophy: its fantasy moral literature: soft. https://t.co/BQZ9XZuR9j

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-15 13:41:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1680210943400091649

  • Because I am correct most of the time. That’s why. Islam teaches you tribalism,

    Because I am correct most of the time. That’s why.
    Islam teaches you tribalism, superstition, deceit, low trust, ignorance, false conficence, false virtue, decline, poverty, and dysgenia. Islam is a cancer that has destroyed and reduced to ignorance, backwardness, poverty, decline, and endless petty violence to preserve a set of lies.
    Why? Because all those things you mention do not cause you to adapt to the universe as it is – but to lie about it, so you can socially construct the illusion of morality instead of a false morality that produces said ignorance and poverty.

    Reply addressees: @dawahadvocate92 @Lord__Sousa @sneako

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 15:35:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679877309594050560

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679834299342934018

  • Testing a Set of AIs While I Work. IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉 1) I

    Testing a Set of AIs While I Work.
    IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉

    1) I use ChatGPT4 with the Scholar AI Plugin the most, but chat GPT will lie to me.
    2) Bard doesn’t lie to me so far, but it’s not quite as bright as ChatGPT4. It is however, extremely helpful despite the clown world UI design typical of Google. 😉 And I see their experience with users is showing.
    3) I use Perplexity Ai pretty consistently throughout the day because it does the best academic searching.
    4) I love Pi AI at https://t.co/14kapz6WtZ and I can see that as the optimum user interface for most users to’ think through’ ideas.
    5) Palm AI doesn’t lie either. It’s a bit dim. But it doesn’t require plugins to answer academic questions.
    6) Anthropic lies through its teeth and I can’t tolerate it.

    Lastly all I really care about is Musk’s AI because I just want an AI that doesn’t lie to me. I’m an adult. If you need an emotional safetynet maybe you shouldn’t have access to the internet at all?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 01:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679662425258295296

  • Testing a Set of AIs While I Work. IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉 1) I

    Testing a Set of AIs While I Work.
    IMO, we’re not going to use just one. 😉

    1) I use ChatGPT4 with the Scholar AI Plugin the most, but chat GPT will lie to me.
    2) Bard doesn’t lie to me so far, but it’s not quite as bright as ChatGPT4. It is however, extremely helpful despite the clown world UI design typical of Google. 😉 And I see their experience with users is showing.
    3) I use Perplexity Ai pretty consistently throughout the day because it does the best academic searching.
    3) I love Pi AI at https://t.co/14kapz6WtZ and I can see that as the optimum user interface for most users to’ think through’ ideas.
    4) Palm AI doesn’t lie either. It’s a bit dim. But it doesn’t require plugins to answer academic questions.
    5) Anthropic lies through its teeth and I can’t tolerate it.

    Lastly all I really care about is Musk’s AI because I just want an AI that doesn’t lie to me. I’m an adult. If you need an emotional safetynet maybe you shouldn’t have access to the internet at all?

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-14 01:21:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679660556578332672

  • “First of all: they can’t. Second of all: they’re lying :)”— @Neferetiiti

    –“First of all: they can’t. Second of all: they’re lying :)”— @Neferetiiti https://twitter.com/Nefertiiti/status/1679505340360974338

  • “First of all: they can’t. Second of all: they’re lying :)”— @Neferetiiti

    –“First of all: they can’t. Second of all: they’re lying :)”— @Neferetiiti

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 15:01:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679506366401073155

  • Did conservative justicies leak or did liberal justices leak? As far as I know,

    Did conservative justicies leak or did liberal justices leak?
    As far as I know, we knew within twelve hours who leaked the abortion judgement, and who she was clerking for.
    We always pay for people to come to our gatherings and proceedings. Justices aren’t paid enough to travel otherwise. Nor are academics or intellectuals – even minor think tank folk like me. All of us have appearance and speaking fees. Most of us will speak for free if we have our expenses covered in advance. The question isn’t if one benefitted, but whether there is a relationship between the benefit and a judgement: a quid pro quo. None of the justices have as far as I know engaged in a quid pro quo. They are aligned as constitutionalists vs populists and they are invited constitutionalist vs populist venues. If that requires buying a book I think that’s probably inappropriate because it is a quid-pro-quo even if not for the purpose of altering a judgement. But it’s not substantive enough. For example Obama’s book deal was pretty substantive and at least appeared to be a quid pro quo.

    Now, should Sotomayor sit the bench? Of course not. She is an anti-constitutional activist happy to bypass the people and the legislature (‘violating the test of concurrency maintaining the sovereignty of the people over the state’), and it’s not clear she even holds to commonality in law (’empirical discovery of common judgements of irreciprocities by the lower courts’). I read her opinions as intellectually incompetent for the office she holds. At least with Justice Ginsberg she was just merely a populist and anti-constitutionalist activist, but she was intellectually capable -and all of us knew that.

    Reply addressees: @KaivanShroff

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-13 14:16:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1679495130598760450

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678798468280713216

  • Precisely. But then that’s how they get away with it. 😉

    Precisely. But then that’s how they get away with it. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-10 17:12:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678452255471673344

    Reply addressees: @bryanbrey

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678451635670982677

  • If you want to learn the means of falsifying all feminine leftist nonsense, just

    If you want to learn the means of falsifying all feminine leftist nonsense, just try to disentangle what responsibility they’re evading, or what irresponsibility they’re seeking. All differences in male female behavior are reducible to differences in responsibility seeking.

    When you find the hostile feminists, they are just high dominance (low adaptation) females, using undermining to counter male demands for responsibility. That’s all they’re doing.

    So never take them at face value. Just figure out what lie and fraud and social construction of lies and frauds they are trying to produce in order to evade responsibility

    Then have a tiny bit of compassion given that they are not capable of the responsibility we are demanding, nor capable of the disambiguation, analysis, discovery, innovation, adaptation, and evolution that men have through our evolution to specialize in tool use, to produce the luxury that these women take for granted as if it’s oxygen.

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-10 16:59:03 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1678448759586340865

  • It is incredibly easy for people with biases or interests, the resulting malince

    It is incredibly easy for people with biases or interests, the resulting malincentives, energy to pursue those malincentives, using verbal acuity, and intelligence to overload the logical facility of more than half of the population. And if we include those who are empathic… https://twitter.com/patriciamdavis/status/1677738503545958400

    Source date (UTC): 2023-07-09 00:53:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1677843473179856898