Theme: Deception

  • NEOLOGISM: “DELUSIONSHIP” |Intersexual Relationship|: Acquiescence < Marriage <

    NEOLOGISM: “DELUSIONSHIP”

    |Intersexual Relationship|: Acquiescence < Marriage < Committed Relationship < Relationship < “Delusionship” < Dating < Situationship < Hookup < Accident < Availability.

    (Not sure what’s missing from the hierarchy – pls suggest if you can think of any. 😉 )

    Comparison
    No agency, no ability to make decisions, no responsibility, no accountability, VICTIMhood = Children (infantilism). 😉
    -vs-
    Agency, ability to make decisions, responsibility, accountability < VICTOR (adulthood).

    Difference:
    Transactional exchange vs > reciprocity (exteralities) vs > investment (over time)

    Counsel
    I tried, with every woman I dated, to discover how I could create a relationship with this person, by fulfilling what they needed in exchange to the best of my ability. That’s called ‘adaptation’.

    I think people are online shopping as individuals who want to escape adaptation (hyperconsumption in time) instead of seeking reciprocity and self-adaptation (capitalization over time).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-16 15:29:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691834461304827905

  • You cannot testify to the claims that you have quoted – all you can do is lie th

    You cannot testify to the claims that you have quoted – all you can do is lie that you can, and claim wisdom, understanding, and knowledge you cannot demonstrate – parrots do not comprehend what they imitate. They only like the sounds. You are merely an NPC – a parrot lacking…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 20:43:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691188764125679617

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691169429789536256

  • It would be lying. We don’t do it. Because we place higher value on the goods of

    It would be lying. We don’t do it. Because we place higher value on the goods of the truth, than you do on the false comfort of such lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:11:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691150687558578195

    Reply addressees: @RatingsKick @BrianRoemmele

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691143997274853376

  • “I’ve literally heard it from multiple girls that they flirt with every man they

    –“I’ve literally heard it from multiple girls that they flirt with every man they meet as a business strategy. Then they get resentful with men when men don’t take them seriously.”–

    This isn’t really new. It’s that women used to be conscious of it; then feminism denied it to evade responsibility for it and instead criticized men for their lack of emotional intelligence; and now women can’t deny it – and don’t feel the need to.

    I’m usually either surprised (some employee trires to seduce me), offended (insulted that they think it would work), or immune (when they aren’t conscious of just ‘being female’.). But women are always offended because they take it personally when their femininity has no influential or coercive power – at which point they try to undermine you personally or socially (in the workplace) instead.

    Other than the relatively frequent false accusations that executives are biased against women, instead of it used to be rare that women could engage men on an equally empirical basis with the same degree of loyalty to men as men deliver to men, this ‘female’ behavior is the most irritating for executives in the workplace.

    I can easily crush and have the attempt of women in an organization to pull off their manipulation games, especially to organize them – simply by making their behavior public and transparent, and openly licensing the organization to suppress it.

    But the individual behavior of women and their inescapable desire to constantly manipulate, undermine, and socially construct, even when they don’t organize is a constant struggle to prevent dysfunction in an organization.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:10:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691150333328670720

  • COOPERATION BY MECHANISM – NOT INTELLIGENCE Re: Apologies for the reaction to we

    COOPERATION BY MECHANISM – NOT INTELLIGENCE
    Re: https://t.co/dXAh16TENb

    Apologies for the reaction to well-intentioned pseudoscientific fictionalism for the purpose of promotion of science via appeal to populism through the continued abuse of the human want of anthropomorphic explanations – the very supernaturalism that we are still trying to escape that mysticism brought upon us.

    And in particular, the new mysticism that has emerged from the revolution in pseudoscience – both in mathematical physics that’s stagnated the field, and in the behavioral ‘sciences’ in the 20th century.
    I’d prefer we not drag biology back down into that trap as well.

    So, I don’t like the analogy to intelligence or cognition, and would prefer the correct interpretation: *cooperation*. (a) The transition to the integration of mitochondrial cooperation, (b) to multicellular cooperation, (c) to specialization as cooperation, required a series of leaps, but I don’t think it’s truthful or testifiable to claim it’s intelligence.

    We might discuss, as in physics as information, computation, and cooperation – but intelligence?

    No. Prediction isn’t going on down there because memory isn’t going on down there. If recordkeeping of successful trial and error in the absence of prediction is occurring, that’s not intelligence (prediction) it’s trial and error.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-14 18:00:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1691147809955655700

  • is a pseudointellectual whose criticisms are so insubstantive that they’re barel

    is a pseudointellectual whose criticisms are so insubstantive that they’re barely worth responding to, and merely fodder for those of low-verbal-IQ, cognitive femininity, and magical thinking for whom pattern identification and systematizing is unavailable, in the…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 20:26:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690822138343587841

    Reply addressees: @ForTheLifeofTr1 @nathancofnas @TOOEdit @Nathanconfas

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1645232464464314370


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    (the middle east invented institutionalized lying. There are reasons for it. We call institutionalized lying mythicism in early form, and theology after it was influenced by the greeks. Read “Hermes and the cart of lies”.
    We are victims or products of our first institution. The worst of the three primary institutions is organized religion. The best is natural law or what we call our common law of contract and tort.
    The middle east is still a faceless society where corruption, bargaining, lying, are still heroic traits expectd on behalf of your family. Why didn’t they ever escape institutionalized lying? Because it’s the foundation of the civilization.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1645232464464314370

  • @Nathanconfas is a pseudointellectual whose criticisms are so insubstantive that

    @Nathanconfas is a pseudointellectual whose criticisms are so insubstantive that they’re barely worth responding to, and merely fodder for those of low-verbal-IQ, cognitive femininity, and magical thinking for whom pattern identification and systematizing is unavailable, in the face of empathic disapproval.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 20:26:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690822138268184578

  • RT @whatifalthist: Internet culture actively pushes anger and division. Whenever

    RT @whatifalthist: Internet culture actively pushes anger and division. Whenever someone does something impressive, the response isn’t “tha…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 03:31:25 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690566702931521536

  • (Women’s power isnt positive – its undermining. The female method of warfare, wh

    (Women’s power isnt positive – its undermining. The female method of warfare, which you are demonstrating, is just denial, evasion, disapproval, conflaton of wants with truth, magical thinking, lying, manipulatin, placing claims upon others for unearned gains, social construction, sedition and treason. The oddity is all of it is responsibility reversal and evasion. I mean we’re the experts in the subject and its demoralizing.)

    https://t.co/xhj4U2Fv6B

    Reply addressees: @lovelywhite110 @TheAutistocrat


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-13 02:45:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690555235649925120

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690551815148900352

  • Thanks for capturing that and sharing. When you state it that simply its kinda o

    Thanks for capturing that and sharing.
    When you state it that simply its kinda obvious and a bit frustrating that the church failed and we are absent a religion and open to and seducable into another false one. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-08-12 22:45:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690494815023124483

    Reply addressees: @TylerNeutron

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1690492811651567616