Theme: Deception

  • SAW THIS SILENT GENERATION POST SOMEWHERE ELSE Bothers me because I see them as

    SAW THIS SILENT GENERATION POST SOMEWHERE ELSE

    Bothers me because I see them as the “naive and abused generation”. The generation like their parents that were the most and first affected by the Propaganda Generation. The first substantial victims of the Industrialization of Lying. And through that lens this set of statements reads somewhat differently from how the author intended.

    —–BEGIN—-

    Born in the 1930’s and 40’s, we exist as a very special age cohort. We are the Silent Generation.

    We are the smallest number of children born since the early 1900’s. We are the “last ones.”

    We are the last generation, climbing out of the depression, who can remember the winds of war and the impact of a world at war which rattled the structure of our daily lives for years.

    We are the last to remember ration books for everything from gas to sugar to shoes to stoves.

    We saved tin foil and poured fat into tin cans.

    We hand mixed ’white stuff’ with ‘yellow stuff’ to make fake butter.

    We saw cars up on blocks because tires weren’t available.

    We can remember milk being delivered to our house early in the morning and placed in the “milk box” on the porch. [A friend’s mother delivered milk in a horse drawn cart.] We sometimes fed the horse, and our dog, Spot, a Fox Terrier, would greet the milkman when he made our delivery, then he would ride in Glenn’s truck till the end of his route, when Glenn would drive by the house and let Spot off the truck just in time to greet us coming home from elementary school.

    Many of us are the last to hear Roosevelt ’s radio assurances and to see gold stars in the front windows of our grieving neighbors.

    Many of us can also remember the parades on August 15, 1945; VJ Day.

    We saw the ‘boys’ home from the war, build their little houses, pouring the cellar, tar papering it over and living there until they could afford the time and money to build it out.

    We are the last generation who spent much of our childhood without television; instead we imagined what we heard on the radio.

    As we all like to brag, with no TV, we spent our childhood “playing outside until the street lights came on.”

    We did play outside and we did play on our own.

    We turned the hose or the fire hydrants on and ran through the spray to play in the water.

    The lack of television in our early years meant, for most of us, that we had little real understanding of what the world was like.

    Our Saturday afternoons, if at the movies, gave us newsreels of the war sandwiched in between westerns and cartoons.

    Telephones were one to a house, often shared and hung on the wall.

    Computers were called calculators, they only added and were hand cranked; typewriters were driven by pounding fingers, throwing the carriage, and changing the ribbon.

    The ‘Internet’ and ‘GOOGLE’ were words that didn’t exist.

    Newspapers and magazines were written for adults and the news was broadcast on our table radio in the evening by H.V Kaltenborne and Gabriel Heatter.

    We are the last group who had to find out for ourselves.

    As we grew up, the country was exploding with growth.

    The G.I. Bill gave returning veterans the means to get an education and spurred colleges to grow.

    VA loans fanned a housing boom.

    Pent up demand coupled with new installment payment plans put factories to work.

    New highways would bring jobs and mobility.

    The veterans joined civic clubs and became active in politics.

    In the late 40’s and early 50’s the country seemed to lie in the embrace of brisk but quiet order as it gave birth to its new middle class (which became known as ‘Baby Boomers’).

    …. it goes on …


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-20 14:47:00 UTC

  • Saw This Silent Generation Post Somewhere Else

    Bothers me because I see them as the “naive and abused generation”. The generation like their parents that were the most and first affected by the Propaganda Generation. The first substantial victims of the Industrialization of Lying. And through that lens this set of statements reads somewhat differently from how the author intended. —–BEGIN—- Born in the 1930’s and 40’s, we exist as a very special age cohort. We are the Silent Generation. We are the smallest number of children born since the early 1900’s. We are the “last ones.” We are the last generation, climbing out of the depression, who can remember the winds of war and the impact of a world at war which rattled the structure of our daily lives for years. We are the last to remember ration books for everything from gas to sugar to shoes to stoves. We saved tin foil and poured fat into tin cans. We hand mixed ’white stuff’ with ‘yellow stuff’ to make fake butter. We saw cars up on blocks because tires weren’t available. We can remember milk being delivered to our house early in the morning and placed in the “milk box” on the porch. [A friend’s mother delivered milk in a horse drawn cart.] We sometimes fed the horse, and our dog, Spot, a Fox Terrier, would greet the milkman when he made our delivery, then he would ride in Glenn’s truck till the end of his route, when Glenn would drive by the house and let Spot off the truck just in time to greet us coming home from elementary school. Many of us are the last to hear Roosevelt ’s radio assurances and to see gold stars in the front windows of our grieving neighbors. Many of us can also remember the parades on August 15, 1945; VJ Day. We saw the ‘boys’ home from the war, build their little houses, pouring the cellar, tar papering it over and living there until they could afford the time and money to build it out. We are the last generation who spent much of our childhood without television; instead we imagined what we heard on the radio. As we all like to brag, with no TV, we spent our childhood “playing outside until the street lights came on.” We did play outside and we did play on our own. We turned the hose or the fire hydrants on and ran through the spray to play in the water. The lack of television in our early years meant, for most of us, that we had little real understanding of what the world was like. Our Saturday afternoons, if at the movies, gave us newsreels of the war sandwiched in between westerns and cartoons. Telephones were one to a house, often shared and hung on the wall. Computers were called calculators, they only added and were hand cranked; typewriters were driven by pounding fingers, throwing the carriage, and changing the ribbon. The ‘Internet’ and ‘GOOGLE’ were words that didn’t exist. Newspapers and magazines were written for adults and the news was broadcast on our table radio in the evening by H.V Kaltenborne and Gabriel Heatter. We are the last group who had to find out for ourselves. As we grew up, the country was exploding with growth. The G.I. Bill gave returning veterans the means to get an education and spurred colleges to grow. VA loans fanned a housing boom. Pent up demand coupled with new installment payment plans put factories to work. New highways would bring jobs and mobility. The veterans joined civic clubs and became active in politics. In the late 40’s and early 50’s the country seemed to lie in the embrace of brisk but quiet order as it gave birth to its new middle class (which became known as ‘Baby Boomers’). …. it goes on …
  • In an era where individuals have no value or control, they seek attention via pr

    In an era where individuals have no value or control, they seek attention via pretense of value and control by cheaply publishing opinion.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-19 15:08:37 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/910158694029119493

    Reply addressees: @StefanMolyneux

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/909149338068283393


    IN REPLY TO:

    @StefanMolyneux

    Everybody is offended by everything.

    https://t.co/242ufyEcvB

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/909149338068283393

  • Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is episte

    Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is epistemically superior to Truth. We spend all our time worrying about what’s true (cause it’s cheap) when the question is whether anything is false (which is expensive.)
  • Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is episte

    Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is epistemically superior to Truth. We spend all our time worrying about what’s true (cause it’s cheap) when the question is whether anything is false (which is expensive.)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-16 11:56:00 UTC

  • Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is episte

    Funny that it’s so obvious but that its so unintuitive: That Falsehood is epistemically superior to Truth. We spend all our time worrying about what’s true (cause it’s cheap) when the question is whether anything is false (which is expensive.)
  • Propertarianism Will Absolutely Help You Discover Incentives, Just As Testimonials Will Help You Discover Falsehoods. &#13

    —“Incentives are not always easy to identify”— I dunno. I can almost always identify them. At worst, it’s pretty easy to create a range of possibilities. It takes practice. But we all want to acquire the same things. And we all start from pretty obviously different positions. I hate conflict but I can take care of myself. Hence why I have libertarian economic intuitions. ( I have high openness to experience ) I loathe the priestly (pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, pseudo-ideal, pseudo-mythical) caste. (Purity) And I feel revulsion toward the underclasses on every level (disgust, purity). Both of which are a defense of the commons – making me a conservative. (i.e. Masculine reproductive strategy) So I favor a conservative (eugenic) social order, but with lots of liberty (opportunity) for experimentation and variation in the status hierarchy. We can measure all these things and predict them and they’re all reducible to brain structures. We all make excuses to explain what is good when what we mean is that we have a preference. – Socialism: Feminine Dysgenic Distributed Consumption, – Market Liberalism: Balanced Market of largely meritocratic distribution, – Fascism(Nationalism): Masculine Eugenic Concentrated Savings Are an the Elephant, and only men are the riders that steer them. Women have necessary reproductive intuitions (Drives) but extremely dangerous political intuitions. Men pretty much have the opposite. If we are properly socialized we are compatible. If we are improperly socialized and given political license we are incompatible. Americans are improperly socialized.
  • PROPERTARIANISM WILL ABSOLUTELY HELP YOU DISCOVER INCENTIVES, JUST AS TESTIMONIA

    PROPERTARIANISM WILL ABSOLUTELY HELP YOU DISCOVER INCENTIVES, JUST AS TESTIMONIALS WILL HELP YOU DISCOVER FALSEHOODS.

    —“Incentives are not always easy to identify”—

    I dunno. I can almost always identify them.

    At worst, it’s pretty easy to create a range of possibilities. It takes practice. But we all want to acquire the same things. And we all start from pretty obviously different positions.

    I hate conflict but I can take care of myself. Hence why I have libertarian economic intuitions. ( I have high openness to experience )

    I loathe the priestly (pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, pseudo-ideal, pseudo-mythical) caste. (Purity)

    And I feel revulsion toward the underclasses on every level (disgust, purity).

    Both of which are a defense of the commons – making me a conservative. (i.e. Masculine reproductive strategy)

    So I favor a conservative (eugenic) social order, but with lots of liberty (opportunity) for experimentation and variation in the status hierarchy.

    We can measure all these things and predict them and they’re all reducible to brain structures.

    We all make excuses to explain what is good when what we mean is that we have a preference.

    – Socialism: Feminine Dysgenic Distributed Consumption,

    – Market Liberalism: Balanced Market of largely meritocratic distribution,

    – Fascism(Nationalism): Masculine Eugenic Concentrated Savings

    Are an the Elephant, and only men are the riders that steer them. Women have necessary reproductive intuitions (Drives) but extremely dangerous political intuitions. Men pretty much have the opposite.

    If we are properly socialized we are compatible. If we are improperly socialized and given political license we are incompatible.

    Americans are improperly socialized.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-09-16 11:06:00 UTC

  • Propertarianism Will Absolutely Help You Discover Incentives, Just As Testimonials Will Help You Discover Falsehoods. &#13

    —“Incentives are not always easy to identify”— I dunno. I can almost always identify them. At worst, it’s pretty easy to create a range of possibilities. It takes practice. But we all want to acquire the same things. And we all start from pretty obviously different positions. I hate conflict but I can take care of myself. Hence why I have libertarian economic intuitions. ( I have high openness to experience ) I loathe the priestly (pseudoscientific, pseudo-rational, pseudo-ideal, pseudo-mythical) caste. (Purity) And I feel revulsion toward the underclasses on every level (disgust, purity). Both of which are a defense of the commons – making me a conservative. (i.e. Masculine reproductive strategy) So I favor a conservative (eugenic) social order, but with lots of liberty (opportunity) for experimentation and variation in the status hierarchy. We can measure all these things and predict them and they’re all reducible to brain structures. We all make excuses to explain what is good when what we mean is that we have a preference. – Socialism: Feminine Dysgenic Distributed Consumption, – Market Liberalism: Balanced Market of largely meritocratic distribution, – Fascism(Nationalism): Masculine Eugenic Concentrated Savings Are an the Elephant, and only men are the riders that steer them. Women have necessary reproductive intuitions (Drives) but extremely dangerous political intuitions. Men pretty much have the opposite. If we are properly socialized we are compatible. If we are improperly socialized and given political license we are incompatible. Americans are improperly socialized.
  • German Philosophy

    by Daniel Gurpide The more I follow Curt’s posts, the more I realize German philosophy is not that ‘great’. The Greats of German philosophy (Kant-Fichte-Hegel-Marx-Heidegger, I’m leaving Nietzsche outside on purpose, I know) make up a Counter-Enlightenment tradition that ends up being suspicious of science and technology, anti-individualistic and anti-liberal. They all contributed in varying degrees to the authoritarian regimes that developed in the 1900s – the various forms of authoritarian nationalisms, the national and international socialisms, the fascisms – and the cultural catastrophes named ‘Frankfurt School’ and ‘Post-Modernism’. Kant (the only picture in Kant’s house was a portrait of Rousseau that was hanging over his writing desk) buttressed the pre-modern worldview of faith and duty against the inroads of the Enlightenment: “I have therefore found it necessary to deny knowledge in order to make room for faith.” (Kant) Hegel explicitly attacks the entire tradition of logic as it had developed from Aristotle to modernity. He wants to believe in a kind of spiritually-driven, dialectically-evolving metaphysics that cannot be expressed logically. His deeper views are that one’s self is but an aspect of the collective, that the Divine works through collective self-realization, and that the State is the manifestation of the Divine. Hegel on the beginning of the universe: “So far, there is nothing: something is to become. The beginning is not pure nothing, but a nothing from which something is to proceed; so that being is already contained in the beginning. The beginning thus contains both, being and nothing; it is the unity of being and nothing, or is not-being which is being, and being which is also not being.” This is a forewarning of the worst Heidegger, the ‘nazi’ philosopher par excellence who paradoxically ended up recreating the Jewish cosmogonic myth (Creation ‘ex nihilo’). The triad Kant-Fichte-Hegel is behind the modern German educational system, still active nowadays: a factory of perfect automata devoid of personality, adept at crushing any signs of individualism. Social conformism explains why today in Germany there is no resistance to the suicidal program implemented by ‘Big Mutti’. German philosophers are Lutheran pastors in a new garb. All of them, even Marx. Is he German or Jewish? I’m not sure. Isn’t Protestantism another big gulp of Abrahamism? Are Kant, Fichte, Hegel, Heidegger German or Jewish? Is more dangerous the combination of a German philosopher raised in an Abrahamic cult or a Jewish thinker educated in the German school?