Theme: Deception
-
“The reflex reaction of Leftists is to silence those with whom they disagree and
–“The reflex reaction of Leftists is to silence those with whom they disagree and to rationalize behavior by themselves that they decry (or imagine) in others. They are cry-bully fascists.”— that’s what psychotic women do. -
FAILURE OF RECIPROCITY ANNOYS ME NO END
http://www.dailywire.com/news/21559/media-ignore-mass-shooting-tennessee-because-it-hank-berrien?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=091817-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro#THIS FAILURE OF RECIPROCITY ANNOYS ME NO END.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 21:15:00 UTC
-
“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi
—“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone.
Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 13:15:00 UTC
-
“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi
—“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone. Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley -
“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived hi
—“Speaking truth to power when it truly matters can render someone a perceived high threat, especially if in response to someone else’s bad behaviours towards that someone. Doing so often makes us “bad” and “aggressive” because, yes, we won’t submit to being good as you characterise it, as being someone’s mere tool. Tools are expended and dispensed of.”— Davin Eastley -
Mindfulness is achievable – that’s the evidence. The question is why we need to
Mindfulness is achievable – that’s the evidence. The question is why we need to achieve it by deception…. we don’t. Buddha was speaking in conflationary nonsense because he lacked the scientific means to speak otherwise. But his original attempt at producing a discipline of mindfulness was second only to the stoics. In my opinion, the principle purpose of studying philosophy is also mindfulness.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 13:08:00 UTC
-
Mindfulness is achievable – that’s the evidence. The question is why we need to
Mindfulness is achievable – that’s the evidence. The question is why we need to achieve it by deception…. we don’t. Buddha was speaking in conflationary nonsense because he lacked the scientific means to speak otherwise. But his original attempt at producing a discipline of mindfulness was second only to the stoics. In my opinion, the principle purpose of studying philosophy is also mindfulness. -
Mindfulness is achievable – that’s the evidence. The question is why we need to
Mindfulness is achievable – that’s the evidence. The question is why we need to achieve it by deception…. we don’t. Buddha was speaking in conflationary nonsense because he lacked the scientific means to speak otherwise. But his original attempt at producing a discipline of mindfulness was second only to the stoics. In my opinion, the principle purpose of studying philosophy is also mindfulness. -
LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FA
LOOK. I WON’T GET ON THE ANTI-ANYONE BANDWAGON. I PROSECUTE IDEAS, ARGUMENTS, FALSEHOODS, AND LIES.
We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer.
—“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’
Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE.
The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses.
The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth.
As far as I know, that’s the science.
My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy.
If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-30 12:59:00 UTC
-
Look. I Won’t Get On The Anti-Anyone Bandwagon. I Prosecute Ideas, Arguments, Falsehoods, And Lies.
We must all advocate for our kin first. Yes. But small-state nationalism is the answer. —“…if you’re not racist…”– A ‘friend’ Racial Realism is very different from racism (criticism of others). Other races or tribes, or cults, or parties are only a problem if YOU LET THEM BE. The primary difference between the races appears to be degree of neotonic evolution, and the degree of suppression of the reproduction of the underclasses. The higher the distribution (suppression of the underclass) and the higher the neoteny (slowing of maturity) the greater the trust, the higher the velocity, the greater the production of knowledge and wealth. As far as I know, that’s the science. My opinion remains: if you’re bitching about others you’re just like some woman gossiping because she doesn’t like her position in the status hierarchy. If you say act to alter that condition for the preservation of your kin, and your status, due to the competitive advantage of your elites, by changing yourself, your government, to preserve that advantage from competitors, then that’s just boring ordinary scientific rationality.