Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • RUNS IN THE FAMILY…. On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Repor

    https://everipedia.org/wiki/Doolittle_Report%2C_1954/IT RUNS IN THE FAMILY….

    On intelligence agencies…..

    Summary

    The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA.

    (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.)

    Personnel

    The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”.

    ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. )

    (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )Updated Dec 28, 2017, 6:32 PM

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-28 18:32:00 UTC

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )

  • It Runs In The Family….

    On intelligence agencies….. Summary The Doolittle Report advocated policies not usually associated with democratic countries. The tense security fears of the Cold War were reflected on a domestic level, exemplified by McCarthyism. Americans were seized by a fear of communism. Doolittle echoed this sentiment in his report: “We must develop effective espionage and counterespionage services and must learn to subvert, sabotage and destroy our enemies by more clever, more sophisticated and more effective methods than those used against us. It may become necessary that the American people be acquainted with, understand and support this fundamentally repugnant philosophy.”[2] This mindset is present throughout Doolittle’s general observations about the CIA’s role and its impact on American society. He also produced specific recommendations for changes in the CIA. (CURT: Intelligence as a military force.) Personnel The Doolittle Report stated that the most important element of covert operations was personnel. It argued that the CIA should dismiss operatives and analysts who were not highly competent. Doolittle argued that “there is no place in the C.I.A. for mediocrity.”[2] In order to raise standards in the agency the report suggested that recruiting be improved. Doolittle also urged intensified training of those already in the agency, and policies to assure that personnel would only be assigned to duties and locations for which they were highly qualified. His report recommended a smaller but more effective workforce and urged that the CIA director should be “above political considerations”. ( CURT: Intelligence as an ‘elite’ force. ) (CURT: Aristocracy. Runs in the family. lol )

  • Are You Racist?

    I ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS – LARGELY IN ORDER TO PREVENT LYING BY STATEMENTS, SUGGESTION OR IMPLICATION.

    Racism is, as I understand it, refers to four behaviors:

    1) the process of treating an individual by the properties of his class (race) rather than waiting to ascertain the properties that he himself demonstrates. In other words, stereotyping. Unfortunately stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. So this is difficult to counteract outside of commercial interactions.

    2) the process of criticizing a class (race) for the costs that they impose on your class (race) rather than taking actions that prevent a class (race) from imposing costs upon your class (race).

    3) the process of denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    4) the process of conducting genocidal, political, economic, and kinship warfare by denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    Racism is not any of these four behaviors:

    1) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    2) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people (like all creatures) favor their class (kin, tribe, race) group for the simple reason that except as outliers, it is in their status, social, reproductive, economic, and political interests to do so.

    3) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people vote in democracies heavily by race, gender, and class, thereby competing by EQUAL political vote rather than by unequal economic, intellectual, or military means.

    4) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people conduct informational and political warfare instead of economic and violent warfare, by the denial of differences in abilities, biases, preferences, behaviors, intentions, and goals.

    That’s simply empirical science.

    And arguing against it is simply lying.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-you-racist-2

  • Is It Possible A Racialist Really Knows Anything About Communism?

    AN UNPLEASANT BUT TRUTHFUL ANSWER TO A QUESTIONABLE QUESTION

    —-”Is it possible a racialist really knows anything about communism? “—

    I bet I know more about both subjects than anyone else you can find. And it’s not even that hard. Communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of Judaism. And it failed like Judaism failed – and Libertarianism, because neither reflects human behavior, and neither constructs commons. And commons are the means by which agrarians defeated the pastoralists in the ancient world. And commons are the means by which industrialists defeated agrarians in the modern world. Yet Judaism, libertarianism, seek to abandon all commons, and communism seeks to abandon all property. Meanwhile social democracy and classical liberalism seek only to compete over the production of dysgenic underclass or a eugenic middle class commons. Classical liberals understand agency and are willing to suppress underclass reproduction to achieve it. Social democrats understand lack of agency and are will to expand underclass reproduction to subsidize it.

    As for racial realism, people act racially in all circumstances IF THEY CAN AFFORD TO, or can use it to advance their political power or use it to retain their political power, because political power provides control over the production of commons that advance eugenic, dysgenic, and genetic warfare.

    We are no different from any other living organism. We compete on behalf of our genes. We just do a very good job of justifying our actions as moral, rather than warfare on behalf of our genes.

    We have done very poorly under a century of marxist pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard/Rand, Strauss, and the modern fictionalism (outright lying where pseudoscience failed) of it we call Postmodernism.

    No more lies. People demonstrate their actions in large numbers and they are measurable. That science says nothing but that we act in our rational genetic and self interest at all times, and all our speech is merely attempts to negotiation an advantage via deception (reciprocity) rather than engage in reciprocal trade – meritocracy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-a-racialist-really-knows-anything-about-communism

  • Are You Racist?

    I ANSWER HARD QUESTIONS – LARGELY IN ORDER TO PREVENT LYING BY STATEMENTS, SUGGESTION OR IMPLICATION.

    Racism is, as I understand it, refers to four behaviors:

    1) the process of treating an individual by the properties of his class (race) rather than waiting to ascertain the properties that he himself demonstrates. In other words, stereotyping. Unfortunately stereotypes are the most accurate measurement in the social sciences. So this is difficult to counteract outside of commercial interactions.

    2) the process of criticizing a class (race) for the costs that they impose on your class (race) rather than taking actions that prevent a class (race) from imposing costs upon your class (race).

    3) the process of denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    4) the process of conducting genocidal, political, economic, and kinship warfare by denying that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    Racism is not any of these four behaviors:

    1) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that there are differences in aggregate class (race) abilities, biases, preferences, and behaviors.

    2) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people (like all creatures) favor their class (kin, tribe, race) group for the simple reason that except as outliers, it is in their status, social, reproductive, economic, and political interests to do so.

    3) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people vote in democracies heavily by race, gender, and class, thereby competing by EQUAL political vote rather than by unequal economic, intellectual, or military means.

    4) Observing, deciding, speaking, and promoting, that people conduct informational and political warfare instead of economic and violent warfare, by the denial of differences in abilities, biases, preferences, behaviors, intentions, and goals.

    That’s simply empirical science.

    And arguing against it is simply lying.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute
    Kiev, Ukraine.

    https://www.quora.com/Are-you-racist-2

  • Is It Possible A Racialist Really Knows Anything About Communism?

    AN UNPLEASANT BUT TRUTHFUL ANSWER TO A QUESTIONABLE QUESTION

    —-”Is it possible a racialist really knows anything about communism? “—

    I bet I know more about both subjects than anyone else you can find. And it’s not even that hard. Communism is a pseudoscientific restatement of Judaism. And it failed like Judaism failed – and Libertarianism, because neither reflects human behavior, and neither constructs commons. And commons are the means by which agrarians defeated the pastoralists in the ancient world. And commons are the means by which industrialists defeated agrarians in the modern world. Yet Judaism, libertarianism, seek to abandon all commons, and communism seeks to abandon all property. Meanwhile social democracy and classical liberalism seek only to compete over the production of dysgenic underclass or a eugenic middle class commons. Classical liberals understand agency and are willing to suppress underclass reproduction to achieve it. Social democrats understand lack of agency and are will to expand underclass reproduction to subsidize it.

    As for racial realism, people act racially in all circumstances IF THEY CAN AFFORD TO, or can use it to advance their political power or use it to retain their political power, because political power provides control over the production of commons that advance eugenic, dysgenic, and genetic warfare.

    We are no different from any other living organism. We compete on behalf of our genes. We just do a very good job of justifying our actions as moral, rather than warfare on behalf of our genes.

    We have done very poorly under a century of marxist pseudoscience: Boaz, Marx, Freud, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard/Rand, Strauss, and the modern fictionalism (outright lying where pseudoscience failed) of it we call Postmodernism.

    No more lies. People demonstrate their actions in large numbers and they are measurable. That science says nothing but that we act in our rational genetic and self interest at all times, and all our speech is merely attempts to negotiation an advantage via deception (reciprocity) rather than engage in reciprocal trade – meritocracy.

    Curt Doolittle
    The Propertarian Institute

    https://www.quora.com/Is-it-possible-a-racialist-really-knows-anything-about-communism

  • They are rejecting the state by doubling down on internal signals. Just as progr

    They are rejecting the state by doubling down on internal signals. Just as progressives double down on equality (false), double down on gender (false), double down on class(false), double down on norms (false). EVERYONE SIGNALS WITH LIES. That’s Religious Devotion: Lie-Signals

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-26 02:59:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/945489266267783169

    Reply addressees: @conradhackett

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942637854710255621

    IN REPLY TO:

    @conradhackett

    34% of Americans reject evolution entirely, say humans existed in present form since beginning of time https://t.co/Hq1Fm2pJNz

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/942637854710255621

  • Love you Mr. President. Keep fighting the good fight against the ‘The Century Of

    Love you Mr. President. Keep fighting the good fight against the ‘The Century Of Pseudoscience we call “progressivism”. NO MORE FICTIONS

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 17:10:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944978650910339072

    Reply addressees: @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944927689638662145

    IN REPLY TO:

    @realDonaldTrump

    The Fake News refuses to talk about how Big and how Strong our BASE is. They show Fake Polls just like they report Fake News. Despite only negative reporting, we are doing well – nobody is going to beat us. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944927689638662145

  • Who invented lying by fictionalism (suggestion, loading, framing, overloading,ps

    Who invented lying by fictionalism (suggestion, loading, framing, overloading,pseudohistory, pseudo reason, pseudoscience) and why, and why is it that so many are attracted to comforting lies, and some people so good at creating comforting lies?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-12-24 13:29:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944923109630595077

    Reply addressees: @plevy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984

    IN REPLY TO:

    @plevy

    Media and cultural evolution 📱 https://t.co/POideG59FR

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/944783727414185984