Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • “As a bit of occasional amusement, I try to tease silly self righteous people in

    “As a bit of occasional amusement, I try to tease silly self righteous people into demonstrating the fact, and then post the conversation for my followers to laugh at. It’s a sophisticated form of humor – with a touch of irony: that the underclass can vote, or even speak in public.” (FYI: On a lark, I’m teasing people on the Left Wing Feminist Show ‘the View’. Sick today and programming is … too hard.)

  • “As a bit of occasional amusement, I try to tease silly self righteous people in

    “As a bit of occasional amusement, I try to tease silly self righteous people into demonstrating the fact, and then post the conversation for my followers to laugh at. It’s a sophisticated form of humor – with a touch of irony: that the underclass can vote, or even speak in public.” (FYI: On a lark, I’m teasing people on the Left Wing Feminist Show ‘the View’. Sick today and programming is … too hard.)

  • THE GRAMMAR AND SEMANTICS OF SOCIAL FRAUD: SOFT VIOLENCE —“Uhhh? I happen to l

    THE GRAMMAR AND SEMANTICS OF SOCIAL FRAUD: SOFT VIOLENCE

    —“Uhhh? I happen to like psychology/sociology”—

    I know you do because it is the grammar and semantics of using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying for the purpose of defending a fraud you desperately seek to preserve, because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scientific discourse is possible.

    Psychology and Sociology consist of a grammar and semantics of shaming. Thats all. A means of using the threat of ostracization as a means of imposing equalitarian conformity.

    it’s just soft violence.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 19:57:00 UTC

  • The Grammar And Semantics Of Social Fraud: Soft Violence

    —“Uhhh? I happen to like psychology/sociology”— I know you do because it is the grammar and semantics of using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying for the purpose of defending a fraud you desperately seek to preserve, because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scientific discourse is possible. Psychology and Sociology consist of a grammar and semantics of shaming. Thats all. A means of using the threat of ostracization as a means of imposing equalitarian conformity. it’s just soft violence.

  • The Grammar And Semantics Of Social Fraud: Soft Violence

    —“Uhhh? I happen to like psychology/sociology”— I know you do because it is the grammar and semantics of using disapproval, shaming, ridicule, gossip, and rallying for the purpose of defending a fraud you desperately seek to preserve, because you lack the agency to discipline your emotions, such that ratio-scientific discourse is possible. Psychology and Sociology consist of a grammar and semantics of shaming. Thats all. A means of using the threat of ostracization as a means of imposing equalitarian conformity. it’s just soft violence.

  • STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

  • STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

  • STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    STOICS HAVE FAR LESS NEED TO LIE

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 19:44:00 UTC

  • (Pls take the humor in the context it was intended. 😉 )

    (Pls take the humor in the context it was intended. 😉 )

    Source date (UTC): 2018-01-19 17:17:05 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954402344103501824

    Reply addressees: @Aintezbncheez @TheView

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954396094074560513

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/954396094074560513

  • It’s Not The Right That Denies The Facts

    —“Q: Why do so many right wingers claim to care about facts while simultaneously believing and sharing blatant misinformation?”— Since the opposite is generally true, that liberals are almost always wrong, because Marxism, Socialism, Freudianism, Boazian Anthropology, all of sociology and psychology, and of course postmodern political correctness are all products of pseudoscience, and conservatism is reducible to the single principle of empirical, sovereign, voluntary reciprocity, it’s pretty hard to guess what it is you’re fantasizing. Conservatives DO use hyperbole (exaggeration) to illustrate ‘what would happen if everyone did this’. But then, that is the whole point of the categorical imperative: only do something if you wish everyone else did it also. Liberalism is nonsense, pseudosicence, and outright lying. Conservatism is just rule of law by reciprocity (tort).