Theme: Deception

  • In the battles of sophisms between sophists the articulate wins. that’s the prob

    In the battles of sophisms between sophists the articulate wins. that’s the problem: we want truth to win.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 14:43:00 UTC

  • You can use sophism to state a truth or sophism to state a falsehood. By using s

    You can use sophism to state a truth or sophism to state a falsehood. By using sophism to state a truth you have done nothing to insure that truth against defeat by sophisms that are false.

    (yes, I mean you, jordan peterson, et al.)


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 14:42:00 UTC

  • —“Truth? I thought you just told the truth, and that’s it!”—

    Well, you can speak honestly regardless of whether what you say is true. It’s the level of falsification you apply and the warranty you put behind it. Honest > Truthful > True > Analytically True > Tautological. Honest(personal but not instrumental due diligence complete) > Truthful(instrumental Due diligence complete) > True(proper) > Analytic Truth(math, logic) > Tautological. Man of us are honest, truthfulness takes time and effort, we rarely if ever know what’s true due to informational incompleteness, and tautology is meaningless repetition.

  • —“Truth? I thought you just told the truth, and that’s it!”—

    Well, you can speak honestly regardless of whether what you say is true. It’s the level of falsification you apply and the warranty you put behind it. Honest > Truthful > True > Analytically True > Tautological. Honest(personal but not instrumental due diligence complete) > Truthful(instrumental Due diligence complete) > True(proper) > Analytic Truth(math, logic) > Tautological. Man of us are honest, truthfulness takes time and effort, we rarely if ever know what’s true due to informational incompleteness, and tautology is meaningless repetition.

  • (SLAP!) MARXIST…. MUNCH YOUR CRAYONS —“Just go read Das Capital”— Young Fe

    (SLAP!) MARXIST…. MUNCH YOUR CRAYONS

    —“Just go read Das Capital”— Young Female Marxist

    I have read every significant work of economic theory ever written, (as well as most in mathematics, logic, philosophy, history, politics, the military and the arts).

    As far as I know I’m one of the best philosophers working today. Really. And that’s not because I’m all that good, but that philosophy is in such a death spiral.

    1) Marxism is a work of fiction for the ill mannered, not-very-bright and abysmally ignorant which is why they only teach it in non-STEM disciplines where the not-very-bright and ignorant can munch literary crayons while in the context of pseudo intellectual coloring books.

    2) Subjective value is true and labor value is false. This cannot be otherwise. Sorry. There is zero evidence to the contrary.

    3) Value is created by organizing production not performing production. Labor is the least valuable part of the cycle with the lowest return on time per hour.

    4) Property, Money, Prices, Interest, Contract are necessary for the organization of production in a kaleidic universe.

    5) Prices and prices for our time in particular, are necessary for both decidability and for incentives.

    6) The incentives necessary to motivate the semi-domesticated animals and the cost of training them to function whatsoever are far higher than motivating the domesticated humans and the cost of training them is far lower than their underclass peers.

    7) People were raised out of ignorance and poverty by consumer capitalism and the primary beneficiaries are those at the bottom.

    8) People (underclasses) are not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated, because they’re largely only partly domesticated animals, and our prosperity is dependent upon increasing the humans and decreasing the semi-domesticated human animals, for the simple reason that people are only 20% more productive than they can consume and therefore every person at the bottom consumes the entire productivity of five to six people at the top.

    9) If you cannot compete in today’s market it is because you are too ill mannered, ill cultured, poorly raised, with an undesirable personality and stupid to provide any value to your fellow man other than staying out of the way and causing as little harm, damage, and parasitism as possible.

    Thanks.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-05-09 14:36:00 UTC

  • —“Do you have to be right-Wing and emotionless to be a masculine / real man ?”—

    Um. I dunno about emotionless, but if that means “not open to femininemanipulation or argumentative sophistry”, then yes. As far as I know to be a left wing man requires you’re effeminate in temperament, suggestible under effeminate manipulation, a practitioner of argumentative sophistry, and you are completely ignorant of demographics, genetics, economics, and the behavior of people in organizations and groups. I mean. That’s pretty much on the mark.

  • —“Do you have to be right-Wing and emotionless to be a masculine / real man ?”—

    Um. I dunno about emotionless, but if that means “not open to femininemanipulation or argumentative sophistry”, then yes. As far as I know to be a left wing man requires you’re effeminate in temperament, suggestible under effeminate manipulation, a practitioner of argumentative sophistry, and you are completely ignorant of demographics, genetics, economics, and the behavior of people in organizations and groups. I mean. That’s pretty much on the mark.

  • It’s the Truth That’s Unkind

    You know, for the sake of relationships I try to keep quite a bit to myself. That’s why I use distractions of teasing, play, and buffoonery to circumvent many topics. And you know, I thought my wife walked on water. You can’t imagine. But once in a while things leak out under autistic duress. “I am not a life support system for a vagina. Either a marriage is mutually beneficial or it is not. I have to be happy too.” I was like — “Wow, was that my outside voice. That stuff is NEVER supposed to come out of the cage….” lol Or “Do you always tell your friends that you despise your husband?” Or “Did you know a marriage is over once your face shows a disgust response, and it’s only a matter of time?” These events were rare. I think my wife and I had two fights during our marriage, and even our agreement to divorce was civil. And even then she said one of them wouldn’t have happened but she misunderstood me. And again, I still think all things considered she walks on water. People sometimes think I’m unkind but I think I’m extremely patient and considerate given what generally goes through my mind while their speaking. It’s the truth that’s unkind.

  • It’s the Truth That’s Unkind

    You know, for the sake of relationships I try to keep quite a bit to myself. That’s why I use distractions of teasing, play, and buffoonery to circumvent many topics. And you know, I thought my wife walked on water. You can’t imagine. But once in a while things leak out under autistic duress. “I am not a life support system for a vagina. Either a marriage is mutually beneficial or it is not. I have to be happy too.” I was like — “Wow, was that my outside voice. That stuff is NEVER supposed to come out of the cage….” lol Or “Do you always tell your friends that you despise your husband?” Or “Did you know a marriage is over once your face shows a disgust response, and it’s only a matter of time?” These events were rare. I think my wife and I had two fights during our marriage, and even our agreement to divorce was civil. And even then she said one of them wouldn’t have happened but she misunderstood me. And again, I still think all things considered she walks on water. People sometimes think I’m unkind but I think I’m extremely patient and considerate given what generally goes through my mind while their speaking. It’s the truth that’s unkind.

  • (slap!) Marxist…. Munch Your Crayons

    —“Just go read Das Capital”— Young Female Marxist I have read every significant work of economic theory ever written, (as well as most in mathematics, logic, philosophy, history, politics, the military and the arts). As far as I know I’m one of the best philosophers working today. Really. And that’s not because I’m all that good, but that philosophy is in such a death spiral. 1) Marxism is a work of fiction for the ill mannered, not-very-bright and abysmally ignorant which is why they only teach it in non-STEM disciplines where the not-very-bright and ignorant can munch literary crayons while in the context of pseudo intellectual coloring books. 2) Subjective value is true and labor value is false. This cannot be otherwise. Sorry. There is zero evidence to the contrary. 3) Value is created by organizing production not performing production. Labor is the least valuable part of the cycle with the lowest return on time per hour. 4) Property, Money, Prices, Interest, Contract are necessary for the organization of production in a kaleidic universe. 5) Prices and prices for our time in particular, are necessary for both decidability and for incentives. 6) The incentives necessary to motivate the semi-domesticated animals and the cost of training them to function whatsoever are far higher than motivating the domesticated humans and the cost of training them is far lower than their underclass peers. 7) People were raised out of ignorance and poverty by consumer capitalism and the primary beneficiaries are those at the bottom. 8) People (underclasses) are not oppressed, but incrementally domesticated, because they’re largely only partly domesticated animals, and our prosperity is dependent upon increasing the humans and decreasing the semi-domesticated human animals, for the simple reason that people are only 20% more productive than they can consume and therefore every person at the bottom consumes the entire productivity of five to six people at the top. 9) If you cannot compete in today’s market it is because you are too ill mannered, ill cultured, poorly raised, with an undesirable personality and stupid to provide any value to your fellow man other than staying out of the way and causing as little harm, damage, and parasitism as possible. Thanks.