Curt Doolittle

Theme: Deception

  • THE OVERPLAYED HAND OF THE HOLOCAUST Sorry, but while it’s true, the argument wa

    THE OVERPLAYED HAND OF THE HOLOCAUST

    Sorry, but while it’s true, the argument was overplayed such that even the red cross disagrees with anywhere the supposed numbers. The gas appears to have been a fraud. Jews (and muslims) had beed deported en mass from Europe many times (and sometimes killed otherwise) – and despite revisionist history, not for entirely unjust reasons.

    And it increasingly appears that Germans did nothing more complex or insidious than fighting world communism by repeating past deportations, using the methods developed for relocations by the Bolsheviks in Russia, while fighting a war on two fronts and running out of money for funding relocation camps – and as a consequence, putting victims to work as slave labor, then starving them to death.

    Not that that it is forgivable, and that we shouldn’t prevent it from ever happening again, but it wasn’t novel, and it pales in comparison to the crimes of the communists and socialists.

    History hates propaganda. People act according to rational incentives. In the end those incentives comes out. And the consensus of any century easily inverted in the next, when the passions once driving the narrative are lost, and the dispassionate find wisdom in the investigation of past deceptions, frauds, and excuses.

    The globalist century is over. It was a failure whether communist or capitalist. And now that technology has equilibrated through the use of markets we return to a balance of powers, nation states, and markets – as in almost all of history.

    Fascism won. Nationalist State Capitalism in the Russia and Chinese model has been in deterministic process since 1992, when the Russians and the Chinese finally gave up on socialism, leaving a trail of destruction through the developing world.

    Propaganda has a half life. And it’s about the length of a human life. Like the winds of time, Historians do their job as clerks of intertemporal facts. The chaff is gradually removed, leaving the kernel of truth: war is a horrible thing and humans are horrible superpredators, and the fact that we get along at all is a miracle of our institutions.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:11:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. NO MORE ABRAHAMISM, BECAUSE: NO MORE LIES My

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    NO MORE ABRAHAMISM, BECAUSE: NO MORE LIES

    My position is very simple, always and everywhere: (a) no more falsehoods, (b) the great civilizations of the ancient world were destroyed by these falsehoods. (c) this same method of creating falsehoods has been recreated in the modern world as marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-freudianism – boazianism; and the very same technique of lies, propaganda, begging tolerance while being flooded with insurgents and opponents has been used today. So fool me once, shame on you (abrahamists), and fool me twice, shame on me.

    All groups may need certain social goods, and we may classify those social goods as religion – while I would classify them as education, oath, ritual, feast, and festival. This is just training that includes mindfulness, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, group strategy, histories (rules of cooperation). whereas we have separated civic training (religious training) from occupational training (the use of the grammars of the universe), that is completely unnecessary.

    The two changed because the church failed to reform (repeatedly) and the secular (education) developed as a competitor to the church (education),.

    There is no reason education – particularly mindfulness (spirituality) – need be constructed of lies – which is evident from the civilizations who were never destroyed by monotheism.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 15:00:36 UTC

  • So far, every argument every person has made against Propertarianism (Natural La

    So far, every argument every person has made against Propertarianism (Natural Law under Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism) is trying to do nothing other than engage in persuasion by deception, rather than truthful, fully informed, productive, warrantied, exchange.

    “What can I get away with” is just an excuse. That’s what ‘justificationism means’

    There is only one question. If you won’t or can’t argue testimonials, then the only reasons are fraud, evasion of due diligence and liability (warranty), or both.

    It’s not complicated.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 12:53:00 UTC

  • THE GRAMMARS OF DECEPTION AND ADDICTION the purpose of christianity is subjugati

    THE GRAMMARS OF DECEPTION AND ADDICTION

    the purpose of christianity is subjugation (submission)

    the purpose of judaism is subjugation (submission).

    the purpose of islam is subjugation (submission)

    Abrahamic grammars of pilpul and critique are simply well constructed lies that through repeated use produce an addiction response, the same way that membership in (submission to) the pack or tribe produces an addiction response.

    It’s a brilliant hack really.

    Evil as hell.

    But brilliant.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 11:58:00 UTC

  • NO MORE ABRAHAMISM, BECAUSE: NO MORE LIES My position is very simple, always and

    NO MORE ABRAHAMISM, BECAUSE: NO MORE LIES

    My position is very simple, always and everywhere: (a) no more falsehoods, (b) the great civilizations of the ancient world were destroyed by these falsehoods. (c) this same method of creating falsehoods has been recreated in the modern world as marxism-socialism-postmodernism-feminism-freudianism – boazianism; and the very same technique of lies, propaganda, begging tolerance while being flooded with insurgents and opponents has been used today. So fool me once, shame on you (abrahamists), and fool me twice, shame on me.

    All groups may need certain social goods, and we may classify those social goods as religion – while I would classify them as education, oath, ritual, feast, and festival. This is just training that includes mindfulness, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, group strategy, histories (rules of cooperation). whereas we have separated civic training (religious training) from occupational training (the use of the grammars of the universe), that is completely unnecessary.

    The two changed because the church failed to reform (repeatedly) and the secular (education) developed as a competitor to the church (education),.

    There is no reason education – particularly mindfulness (spirituality) – need be constructed of lies – which is evident from the civilizations who were never destroyed by monotheism.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-09 11:00:00 UTC

  • Theology(Supernatural), Philosophy(Ideal), and Pseudoscience(Magical) are nothin

    Theology(Supernatural), Philosophy(Ideal), and Pseudoscience(Magical) are nothing more than creative fictions used by generations of frauds to circumvent the law (real).

    Zero Tolerance. Violence. Natural Law. White Sharia.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 20:05:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1016050657332203523

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Theology(Supernatural), Philosophy(Ideal), an

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Theology(Supernatural), Philosophy(Ideal), and Pseudoscience(Magical) are nothing more than creative fictions used by generations of frauds to circumvent the law (real).

    Zero Tolerance. Violence. Natural Law. White Sharia.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 20:05:18 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“I’m a philosopher and you can’t prove tha

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“I’m a philosopher and you can’t prove that [insert random anti-religious statement]”— Some Well Meaning Fool.

    Well, let us play a game then. Because while you state are a philosopher, I state that I am a scientist specializing in testimony (Truth).

    And that means that proofs (tests of internal consistency in axiomatic and therefore declaratives systems) only assist us in falsification outside of reductio (trivial) conditions. And that justificationism in philosophy and theology in all its forms is a sophism for the purpose of deception.

    And that tests of truth in existential systems (hypothesis, theory, law) require due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, and deceit. And that fablsificationism in all its forms (science and law) evolved for the purpose of defeating deceptions.

    And that the possible dimensions of criticism we are aware of are consistency, correspondence, existential(operational) possibility, rational choice (volition), reciprocity, completeness, parsimony, and coherence.

    In other words, while in textual interpretation, scriptural argument, and application of extant law, one justifies a proposition, one does not and cannot prove a statement – instead we seek to falsify propositions and test whether it survives criticism.

    My assertion is:
    (a) that one cannot testify to the existence of a creator;
    (b) that one cannot testify that the works attributed to a creator are not fictions and fictionalisms (lies);
    (c) that those who created and perpetuated those lies had motives for spreading those lies, and;
    (d) that the consequences of spreading those lies has been the cause of the thousand year dark age, the destruction of the five great civilizations of the ancient world, and the death of somewhere between half a billion and a billion people;
    (e) that the argumentative technique invented in order to perpetuate those lies (sophisms), in both via positiva (pilpul and justificationism, using idealism and supernaturalism, with promise of reward/thread of lost opportunity) and via negativa (critique using loading, framing, obscurantism, overloading, suggestion, straw manning, and heaping of undue praise) are open to scientific measurement which defines them as successful methods of deception,
    (f) that Boazian anthropology, Freudian psychology, Cantorian Infinities, Marxist History, Economics, and Sociology, Scientific socialism, Feminism, and postmodernism, all make use of this same technique, this time with pseudoscience as a substitute for supernaturalism, and economic and political reward as a substitute for reward in current or afterlife.
    (g) And that only warranty of due diligence under the available dimensions of human action: consistency, correspondence, existential(operational) possibility, rational choice (volition), reciprocity, completeness, parsimony, and coherence (Testimony), can defend an assertion (proposition, argument) against ignorance, error, bias, fraud, and deceit, and the spread of consequences thereof.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-08 18:35:06 UTC

  • When You Criticize Propertarianism You”re Almost Certainly Wrong

    (REALLY) Any criticism of Propertarianism (Natural Law consisting of Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism) will require fictions, deceptions, and frauds – which I acknowledge are successful means of persuading humans ‘cheaply’. And every criticism I have heard, appears Postmodern (Truth is coherence within the socially constructed frame(paradigm) rather than decidable independent of frames (paradigms)). And my argument is that the west invented Truth coherent with reality and a social order also coherent with reality, and that this is the reason for our military, political, economic, scientific, and intellectual competitiveness. And that the aristocracy used this invention to profit from the continuous domestication of pre-human animals (men) such that the society produced agency and therefore made the aristocracy capable of increasing their numbers, such that they could continue to fight with their successful military strategy (combining technology, maneuver, and independent creative tactics. IT’S NOT COMPLICATED Look, it’s not complicated. Mathematics is a deflationary (limited) grammar that tests for constant positional relations, between anything expressible in constant relations. But because positional relations (ideals) have no limits until applied to real world phenomenon under intertemporal change (reals), they scale infinitely when discussing the model (ideals), if not when applying to reality (the reals). Any set of percievable properties can be expressed in some logic, and our language contains a surprisingly small set of constant relations to test ( just over a dozen), aside from the complexity that arises from the five senses and the relations (Relation (Preposition/Postposition) > Link (Conjunction > Copula ) ) for which english has a host of terms. So in this sense our language can express promises of weights and measures using those experiences, and operational grammar limits us to those which are independent weights and measures. the measure of Value is provide only by: demonstrated action. Either individual investment or reciprocal trade. Like a balance scale without something to balance (trade) all measures of value are arbitrary. So Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism, with the tests of agency(limits) and reciprocity(scope) when stated in operational prose constitute a grammar of subjective value independent continuous constant relations between existence and actions and testimony, while filtering out any and all subjective values, normative values, institutional values, and fictions – making it very difficult to engage in fraud by obscurantism, loading, framing, and deceit. There is very little difference between mathematics and operational language (acquisitionism, propertarianism, and testimonialism) other than mathematics consists of one dimension of constant relations, and operational consists of many (a dozen or so plus sensory and relational weights and measure), and limits inconstant relations ( subjective, normative, traditional, institutional ) values (weights and measures) from the discourse for the simple reason that they are in fact *inconstant relations*. That is not to say that we can’t engage in all sorts of conversation that contains inconstant relations that may be relatively constant between members of a polity. It means that in matters of conflict, those differences remain open to analysis and criticism, and their differences perfectly, always, and everywhere decidable. The central problem of history is failing to separate the constant relations from the inconstant relations, because until we had international law, most juridical decisions were both local, and within local subjective(inconstant) weights and measure (values), and most legislation, regulation, and command imposed inconstant relations upon local polities. In my view this is not very complicated. But the purpose of via-negativa law (and our ability to create a strictly constructed uninterpretable constitution, or even white sharia, or another inquisition) is not the same as telling inspirational stories to the kiddies. Hence why those who rule use law, those who rally use fictions, and those who cooperate use trade. Seriously. Weights and Measures. It’s not complicated.

  • When You Criticize Propertarianism You”re Almost Certainly Wrong

    (REALLY) Any criticism of Propertarianism (Natural Law consisting of Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism) will require fictions, deceptions, and frauds – which I acknowledge are successful means of persuading humans ‘cheaply’. And every criticism I have heard, appears Postmodern (Truth is coherence within the socially constructed frame(paradigm) rather than decidable independent of frames (paradigms)). And my argument is that the west invented Truth coherent with reality and a social order also coherent with reality, and that this is the reason for our military, political, economic, scientific, and intellectual competitiveness. And that the aristocracy used this invention to profit from the continuous domestication of pre-human animals (men) such that the society produced agency and therefore made the aristocracy capable of increasing their numbers, such that they could continue to fight with their successful military strategy (combining technology, maneuver, and independent creative tactics. IT’S NOT COMPLICATED Look, it’s not complicated. Mathematics is a deflationary (limited) grammar that tests for constant positional relations, between anything expressible in constant relations. But because positional relations (ideals) have no limits until applied to real world phenomenon under intertemporal change (reals), they scale infinitely when discussing the model (ideals), if not when applying to reality (the reals). Any set of percievable properties can be expressed in some logic, and our language contains a surprisingly small set of constant relations to test ( just over a dozen), aside from the complexity that arises from the five senses and the relations (Relation (Preposition/Postposition) > Link (Conjunction > Copula ) ) for which english has a host of terms. So in this sense our language can express promises of weights and measures using those experiences, and operational grammar limits us to those which are independent weights and measures. the measure of Value is provide only by: demonstrated action. Either individual investment or reciprocal trade. Like a balance scale without something to balance (trade) all measures of value are arbitrary. So Acquisitionism, Propertarianism, and Testimonialism, with the tests of agency(limits) and reciprocity(scope) when stated in operational prose constitute a grammar of subjective value independent continuous constant relations between existence and actions and testimony, while filtering out any and all subjective values, normative values, institutional values, and fictions – making it very difficult to engage in fraud by obscurantism, loading, framing, and deceit. There is very little difference between mathematics and operational language (acquisitionism, propertarianism, and testimonialism) other than mathematics consists of one dimension of constant relations, and operational consists of many (a dozen or so plus sensory and relational weights and measure), and limits inconstant relations ( subjective, normative, traditional, institutional ) values (weights and measures) from the discourse for the simple reason that they are in fact *inconstant relations*. That is not to say that we can’t engage in all sorts of conversation that contains inconstant relations that may be relatively constant between members of a polity. It means that in matters of conflict, those differences remain open to analysis and criticism, and their differences perfectly, always, and everywhere decidable. The central problem of history is failing to separate the constant relations from the inconstant relations, because until we had international law, most juridical decisions were both local, and within local subjective(inconstant) weights and measure (values), and most legislation, regulation, and command imposed inconstant relations upon local polities. In my view this is not very complicated. But the purpose of via-negativa law (and our ability to create a strictly constructed uninterpretable constitution, or even white sharia, or another inquisition) is not the same as telling inspirational stories to the kiddies. Hence why those who rule use law, those who rally use fictions, and those who cooperate use trade. Seriously. Weights and Measures. It’s not complicated.