Theme: Crisis

  • Putin was the world’s most admired leader until he panicked in 2014, and complet

    Putin was the world’s most admired leader until he panicked in 2014, and completely lost his mind in 2022.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-07 12:15:32 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699758297090261406

    Reply addressees: @MPSausage @Nigel_Farage

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699694058283655334

  • CAUSE OF ISRAEL’S LEGAL CONFLICT Never happen. Israel will eventually nationaliz

    CAUSE OF ISRAEL’S LEGAL CONFLICT
    Never happen. Israel will eventually nationalize their law. They must to survive.
    Israel, like the West, is undergoing a demographic crisis that means its national demise (our various national collapses) and almost certain cultural and institutional regression (and likely genetic regression as unpleasant as it is to say), and while the optimum means of doing so is altering their constitution (all constitutions) to favor the advancement of nationalism because small homogenous polities are the optimum social economic and political order despite all claims to the contrary and false promises of beneficial alternatives.
    Bebe has chosen to do so by centralizing power in the government in order to avoid such a conflict over the reformation of their constitution.
    Note that Russia has explicitly amended its constitution with the intent of ending debate over the issue.
    This isn’t a question of rule of law.
    It’s a question of survival.
    Bebe’s not wrong even if how he’s going about it is indirect.
    Numbers don’t lie.
    People do.

    Reply addressees: @ForeignAffairs @DanKurtzer @aarondmiller2


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 22:01:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699543347591823360

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699541513607192760

  • “Q: Curt: What’s your prediction on Turkey?”– Jarl Turkey is a “torn country”:

    –“Q: Curt: What’s your prediction on Turkey?”– Jarl

    Turkey is a “torn country”: civilizational because it’s a borderland, and demographically because a future Kurdistan is a long term necessity. So deterministically we can see a direction but not an outcome.

    Oddly, Turks are largely genetically Greek (old europe) with limited genetic contribution of Turks (asiatics+iranics). While the Kurds are an Iranic people. This means there is a conflict between genetic capacity (Europe), culture (Turkish), and demographics (Kurdish).

    So there is a strong incentive for Constantinople-Byzantium-Istanbul to maintain imperial control over people and territory. And they happen to be in one of the most valuable pieces of real estate: a toll bridge between Europe, the Middle East, and asia.

    However, the Turkish government is actually capable with enough secularism, and enough of an economy, that it has the potential to dominate the region forming a competitor to Iran’s imperial ambitions. and restoring the balance between north Africa, the kingdoms, Iran, turkey and the catastrophe that is and always will be the syrian-lebanese-israeli-palestinian coast.

    At present, Iran’s ambitions are obvious which Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Kurdistan bits of the caucuses, Iran, from the med, to the black sea, to the Caspian, to the Persian gulf to the Indian ocean. And while their fundamentalist government is a kleptocratic disaster that’s having the same negative effect on the people as did Islam’s fundamentalist shift over a thousand years ago, their strategic ambitions are logical and somewhat in everyone in that region’s interest as a rule-of-law federation even if not a muslim empire of ignorance.

    So the future of Turkey? Demographics and geography produce economics produce geostrategy. So turkey could shrink or expand. Hard to tell. I have a hard time imagining turkey not continuing to turn back to the ME and away from Europe, and not asserting it’s dominance in the region, simply by virtue of better geography, genetics, institutions, and economy.

    I am still having difficulty imagining that we will not see a return to nationalization and the conflict of civilizations as the west ends it’s project of trying to civilize and modernize the rest of the world – a world unwilling and often incapable of it without our ‘government’ if not rule.

    Reply addressees: @NorseJarl @TheAutistocrat @ha27474


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-06 18:22:47 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699488327940947968

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699481060923306297

  • RT @whatifalthist: People often ask me what’s the solution to the current crisis

    RT @whatifalthist: People often ask me what’s the solution to the current crisis. That’s a very modern question. We believe there are solut…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 20:43:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1699161372670714302

  • RT @curtdoolittle: THE CRISIS OF THE AGE IS QUITE SIMPLE There are only two surv

    RT @curtdoolittle: THE CRISIS OF THE AGE IS QUITE SIMPLE
    There are only two surviving intellectual groups in the world, the (right wing) Eu…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-05 04:32:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698916895796138326

  • RT @whatifalthist: It’s weird that in our age people treat the world that existe

    RT @whatifalthist: It’s weird that in our age people treat the world that existed in say 2005 as stable and sacrosanct. The idea that borde…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-04 17:39:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698752775318818907

  • As far as I know Gonzalo Lira was captured at the border trying to exit ukraine,

    As far as I know Gonzalo Lira was captured at the border trying to exit ukraine, and is back under house arrest with another tracker attached. If anyone knows differently please let me know.
    I’m not a fan. Just the opposite. I’m just curious.
    Thx


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-04 02:53:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698529695371845966

  • they are also going to suffer extreme poverty in a few decades, and likely world

    they are also going to suffer extreme poverty in a few decades, and likely world war because the are not producing a new generation.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-03 01:52:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698152049068654727

    Reply addressees: @cp9195

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698151367179731108

  • Correct. You need institutional capital including the ability to switch between

    Correct. You need institutional capital including the ability to switch between war(crisis), going concern, and windfall as needed. But the tendency of the people is to prefer unchanging stability despite that it doesn’t and can’t exist.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-02 17:58:19 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698032621496799617

    Reply addressees: @EdwardSpruit

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1698011727676232020

  • TWITTER WAS THE LAST STRAW BEFORE REVOLUTION? Here is the case we make: 1. This

    TWITTER WAS THE LAST STRAW BEFORE REVOLUTION?
    Here is the case we make:

    1. This new CEO, Linda Yaccarino, is going to ruin Elon’s ambition for Twitter – our demand for open discourse, and, with it, place the final stamp of approval on revolution and civil war – the last straw by removing the last hope.

    2. Elon’s mission to provide a public forum necessary for the presentation of participatory government by informed citizens will fail.

    3. The X-Twitter platform as a political commons is a necessary public service in the preservation of participatory democracy in its conflict with the organized social construction of the ‘March through the institutions of the cultural production of western civilization and its process of, and demand for, individual responsibility in exchange for individual liberty.” Ergo, X-Twitter is necessary political infrastructure, not industry.

    4. But as infrastructure masquerading as a business, X-Twitter is bound by the need for subsidy by advertising, (until it can be supported by fees) just as politicians are financed by the financial sector donors.

    5. Advertisers are constrained by the undermining and cancel strategy of the left, which is repeating the Islamic means of suppression that has destroyed seven great civilizations of the ancient world and reduced them to ignorance and ashes of poverty and superstition.

    6. The left’s warfare against civilization relies on the antisocial behavior of the feminine method of warfare by undermining, shrilling, shouting down, canceling, gossiping, shaming, rallying, psychologizing, and moralizing in order to evade rational argument and reasoned discourse. (See “GSRRM”)

    7. So, instead, X-Twitter’s ‘SAFETY” will once again facilitate the spread of his antisocial behavior that is the primary means of undermining our institutions, our rule of law, by the natural law of sovereignty and reciprocity, our republican government, our concurrent democratic participation. Why? Because there is no means of non-public resolution of disputes other than adversarial debate. Historically, newspapers had asked a set of competent parties to comment, then displayed both sides of an argument, and let the public decide. In some cases, there is insufficient evidence to decide (ie: the vaccine question), and we must make a pragmatic decision. But most importantly, our job is to expose evasions, denials, falsehoods, false promises, and baitings-into-hazard by propagandists.

    8. Advertising and marketing programs are bound by the dominance of women in the field, their indoctrination by the academy, and the dominance of women in hyperconsumption, hypergamy, debt accumulation, spending 70% of household income, and consuming 70% of government resources while being net tax consumers subsidized by male taxpayers.

    9. Political discourse is dominated by feminine and infantile irresponsible intolerance for truth before face, which is the principal reason that our civilization was able to produce a participatory government, the rule of law, and jury trials.

    10. None of us are any longer bound by the inalienable obligation for truth before face to the public, in public, in matters public.

    11. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law requirement of truth before face and reciprocity in policy in matters of public speech.

    12. None of us are any longer bound by limiting ourselves to the resolution of conflict by adversarial debate before the jury refereed by a judge.

    13. Through legal activism, we are no longer bound by the common law’s prohibition on conflict outside of truthful reciprocal debate or court – particularly the crimes of defamation, regardless of material impact.

    14. Through legal activism against the courts we are no longer bound by demand for concurrency in voting and legislation.

    15. Through the process of deliberate undermining by:
    (a) majoritarian legal activism – lawfare – circumventing the legislature and the people and;
    (b) enfranchisement of all, regardless of merit,
    (c) direct election of the Senate instead of Senate a proxy for the governor, and;
    (d) overwhelming immigration in lieu of demand for full integration and;
    (e) the desperate attempt to circumvent the Electoral College as well;
    … we are no longer bound by concurrency between classes and regions, with a small number of vast immigrant cities attempting to seize the continent as the north did in its war of aggression against the agrarian south.

    16. As such, we are no longer bound by the common, natural, concurrent law of self-determination by self-determined means, by reciprocal insurance of sovereignty in demonstrated interests, reciprocity in display word and deed, and inalienability of duty, truth, excellence, and beauty before self, limiting us to voluntary markets for cooperation whether private or public, or truthful reciprocal debate and adversarial competition before a jury of our peers.

    17. As such, as far as I can determine from the evidence:
    (a) We are no longer operating under the rule of the natural law of self-determination that is the only of suppressing conflict and maximizing cooperation.
    (b) We are no longer operating under the process of common law discovery of universal interests in conflict resolution.
    (c) We are no longer operating under the process of voting and legislation by tests of concurrency in agreement of interests between classes and regions.
    (d) Therefore, the state has failed to defend and secure our self-determination by self-determined means, by security of life, liberty, and property (demonstrated interests). And it is time for the replacement of this government and the restoration of our natural rights under our constitution of natural rights obligations and inalienations.
    (e) and the demand for restitution, punishment, and prevention against those who have brought about this criminal condition by sedition and treason both with intent, self-interest at the expense of others, and failure of due diligence against participation in such crimes.

    I think that’s a pretty solid case.
    Let me know what YOU think.

    Cheers

    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute
    The Science of Cooperation

    (reposted, with minor edits, and correcting typos)


    Source date (UTC): 2023-09-02 14:16:24 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1697976772602499072