Theme: Crisis

—“Would a 1968-scale Republican Election Victory prevent the violence and make the (US) revolution peaceful?”—

Very difficult, but possibly. We need all three houses and the court. We have the court. And we have it solid. But all three houses, well, that’s very difficult to achieve right now. If that was possible, and we could frustrate the filibuster, we could get the necessary changes through in a ‘first 100 days’.

Everything our organization recommends as reforms benefits everyone in in the center four-fifths, but is very hard on academy, media, and state, and devastates the corruption of consumer related finance sector that has so preyed upon our people since at least the eighties.

Those reforms would however radically improve the condition for the laboring, working, lower middle, and middle classes that have born the burden of the post seventies decline in real wage growth. And it would restore the primacy of the family rather than the individual as the subject of policy. Which in turn would return us to common interests -since the only way diverse peoples develop a common interests is through the shared interest in the production of families as our first and most important institution.

Can this implementation of policy be done through elections, without showing up with 2M armed men in DC? We’ll I’d like to think so. But let’s look at the four options:

1 – We can’t win the argument because irresponsibility of the left sells – especially to single and childless women who are the sole reason for the political shift and current political collapse. (Really). So we can’t win the argument.

2 – Can we win the vote? I don’t see it. But Americans do amazing things at times, so maybe. But otherwise, it doesn’t look like we can we in the vote.

3 – If we can’t win the vote can we win the courts? Maybe, but it’s terribly expensive (and we’re just starting this year to try). So we are trying to win via the court – but I think we are going to run out of time.

4 – If we can’t win in the courts, and we have no monarchy as judge of last resort, then the only remaining alternative is a common law suit against the state, repeating the declaration and constitution of the founders, and the promise of violence if our just demands are not met.

I’m in the business of truth regardless of costs. And I’m thinking that the last option is rapidly becoming the last option available. And that option is of course permitted by our declaration and constitution, because the people, not the state, are sovereign.

And if they keep trying to change that last bit then we must act without mercy and leave a scar on history such that it is remembered for ten thousand years – the people are sovereign. Period.

Reply addressees: @Stealth_Bandit