Why not? The concept I’m working to popularize is that we were going thru a predictable transition by moving classes of humans into literacy, economy, and politics – and we are unprepared for the introgression of women who unlike the classes and nations of men, practice an entirely different set of antisocial behaviors, and who conduct war by very different means.
The Jews used this method of behavior and warfare since their very early formation but in response to the sequence of Egyptian, Persian, european conquests, they developed a fascinating formalization and synthesis of the female empathizing strategy using male systematizing strategy in the Abrahamic-Marxist sequence. In other words the vast European innovations in truth by reason, empiricism, and science (testimony) – and advancements in physical warfare, were matched by Jewish innovations in sedition, mythicism, and theology – advancements in social warfare.
Now my work is innovative in a number of ways but my work in the human logic of lying and sex differences in cognition manifesting as those sex differences in lying is one of the more powerful innovations in explanatory power. Think of my work in this field as explaining all communication as a sequence of logics just as arithmetic, math, algebra, geometry, calculus and analysis are a subset of that sequence. And as such we have a table of the evolution of grammars ( logics ) for the spectrum of communication that performs the explanation of the structure and function of language just as the periodic table does for chemistry, or the standard model for physics.
So by providing us all with this bit of science culminating in a logic of truth and lying, and especially the sex differences, we can observe how to equally suppress the feminine means of warfare and criminality that plagues us today and has caused the failure of every one of the small number of polities that have been able to enfranchise women, including ours, which includes Sparta, Rome and the postwar West. But is rapidly destroying every advanced first world nation.
The purpose of my work is the reduction of conflict and the fostering of cooperation across groups of all classes, sexes and nations, by prohibiting irreciprocity, and limiting us to truthful reciprocal exchange, so that we continue to prosper in as much peace as possible.
Even if it means we must often look in the mirror – and women now too, if they wish to participate must also limit themselves to the same – despite they evolved for emotional impulsivity instead of reason, selfishness, hyperconsumption, attention gluttony, seduction, parasitism, and irresponsibility for the commons that exposes us all to risk. Unless with three or more children at which point they are forced into creating self regulation, discipline, regularity, cooperation, and responsibility among their children to survive the burden – just as men do the same with adults in the polity. The sexes divide the labor of regulating the spectrum of ages. And irresponsible men and women are a hazard to us all.
As such single women and childless women are the sole reason for the leftward migration if our western polities. For without their votes, no present crisis would exist.
And it is the fault of men who have tolerated women’s destruction of civilization from within by their unregulated instincts both historical, Christian, enlightenment , and postwar that has so far failed to correct these women despite the rapidity of the accumulation of damage in the postwar period.
The problem is fixable by advancing our law to prohibit the female means of antisocial and anti political warfare, or by the less appealing removal of women from the franchise.
But we are far more the product of our genes and culture than we are the independent agents we presume. And less aware of what we do as the biological robots we have discovered we are – and must compensate for with rules and institutions that limit our behavior.
Reply addressees: @HighFivesMirror @D__2__3 @uberboyo