Why did Christianity and Aristocracy fail, and Critical Theory (Cultural Marxism) succeed?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:48:00 UTC
Why did Christianity and Aristocracy fail, and Critical Theory (Cultural Marxism) succeed?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:48:00 UTC
OUR CHURCH FAILED.
abrahamism > judaism > islamism > marxism > democratic socialist secular humanism.
WHY DID OUR CHURCH FAIL TO COMPETE?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 17:22:00 UTC
—“The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failure of the communist East to build a better world, as evidenced by their brutal expansionism and mass slaughters of civilians. They also realized that the West was moving further and further away from appropriating Marx’s doctrines, so they started to concoct new plans. Just as Mao replaced Marx’s concept of the proletariat (trained factory workers) with the masses of unskilled survival farmers, the neo-Marxists foresaw that the Western “proletariat” would never go that route. Hence they started pushing the idea of the revolutionary potential of ALL MINORITY FRINGE GROUPS, such as the Unskilled Third World masses, the feminists and gender benders, the SJW, and lately also the BLM’s and others. They set up the dialectics in such a way that there is one core enemy: whites (esp attacking the traditional concepts of masculinity and feminity). What whites must learn if they are to survive, is that the debate about white survival has been put on the table by people with only one purpose in mind: destruction. The Muslim masses have come to play a central role in this. The core lessons are that these radicals should not be allowed to debate it (well they don’t really debate but shout and cry), and also that the ballot is NOT the forum to decide this.”—Tobie Louw
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 14:29:00 UTC
As far as I know, the order is:
Islam / black plague / the mongols / world communism / the chinese empire’s colonization and rule / western colonialism of the americas / democracy (democratic secular socialist humanism) in all its forms / christianity in its forms.
The problem with these deaths is that both the mongols (black death), and western colonialism (a host of diseases), caused vast deaths, and were heinous, but (a) the diseases were worse than the warriors, (b) colonialism was progressive, the mongols regressive, and islam regressive and destructive, and communism regressive and destructive.
So comparing violence, diseases, institutions, and capital, and we end up with a full accounting.
A population can recover from War. It can recover from Plague. It can recover from the Mongols. But it cannot recover from islam.
why?
numbers, dysgenia, impulsivity, ignorance, impossible-institutions, low-trust.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 12:00:00 UTC
Abrahamism is disease – but Islam is a plague.
The cause of the greatest death, decivilization, and dysgenia in history?
Islam.
ISLAMISM <- MARXISM <- ISLAM <- JUDAISM <-ABRAHAMISM
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 08:53:00 UTC
( Not that I disagree, that we shouldn’t get involved with boots on the ground, but the choice here isn’t binary)
AMERICAN ECONOMY (a High Spatial Consumption Society)
1 – economy funded by financing of homes.
2 – cheap oil necessary for commerce and trade in large territory requiring cars trucks, heat, electricity over large areas.
3 – cheap oil possible by preserving a meritocratic market for oil.
4 – a meritocratic market for oil preserved by an extensive military empire.
5 – a vast military empire paid for by use of the dollar as a reserve currency.
EUROPE
Europe not only does not pay for her own strategic defense, but by issuing the Euro, buying oil in euros, and circumventing the need for dollars to pay for oil, europeans free-ride non only on the personal and social costs of defense, but on the discounted prices for oil that they experience at no cost to themselves.
GEOSTRATEGY
Russian Sphere;
Russia (140), Belarus(10), Kazhakstan(17)
The choice is between
1 – Iran(77)+Syria(23)+Iraq(33)+Russia(140), 265M?
2 – ISIS+Al Queda+Iran = ~100?,
3 – Turkey(75)+ whomever survives the above
and on the opposite side:
4 – The Gulf States + Saudis + Israel+Egypt+the rest of north africa.
OBJECTIVE
What looks increasingly possible is Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, allied with Pakistan. With Iran as the core state like ‘Germany’ planned for europe, russia for the slavic lands.
if that occurs the orbit will include Azerbaijan(9.5) and Turkmenistan(5.2), and while russia will fight for the oil fields, she will not be able to defend herself, and will lose Kazakhstan from Russia’s influence.
At which point we will lose Russia.
And iran will control the world’s oil supply, issue its own currency, demand it as the world’s oil currency, and then the word’s reserve currency, making the islamic civilizations exploit the developed civilizations.
China(1.4b) takes north asia (siberia) back.
Leaving the west and china and islam as the only surviving civilizations.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 18:57:00 UTC
ROME FELL FROM WITHIN
—“You also seem to be under the false impression that the ‘Barbarians’ destroyed Rome. Not really true – Rome destroyed itself from within – much as the Soviet Union did. The Germanics just picked up the pieces.”— Aaron Kahland
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-11 14:25:00 UTC
THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”— Again, a privileged bit of silliness. The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war. Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE. They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants. PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND. what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement. A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.
THE POOR WANT TO SURVIVE. THE PRIVILEGE TALK POLITICS. –“Are the People of the Donbas Communist Sympathisers?”— Again, a privileged bit of silliness. The people in the donbas are fucking dirt poor and it sucks like hell, and the technological revolution that is floating ukraine in the other cities is not there. Right now it is a depopulated wasteland. Think detroit after a civil war. Think of the donbas as say, coal mining regions of wales, or the hills of kentucky, or any of the cities in america that live off state financed military (naval) production, all rolled into one. in 1992 their freaking world fell apart and without the organized redistribution of commerical activity to their region by state military investment, they have NO HOPE. They want pensions, redistribution, and they remember the REAL GOOD that was done for them by the soviet union. THe soviets were TERRIBLE for eastern europe but they were not terrible for many rural russian peasants. PEOPLE REACH FOR WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND. what they just want is food, clothing, shelter, security, family and to have a few hopes that are within reach of achievement. A middle or working class privileged person is a communist sympathizer. He has a luxury. A poor person is just DESPERATE.
—“Our generation will sacrifice ourselves for our posterity, rather than sacrifice our posterity for ourselves.”—Karl Grohe Hang the boomers. Noose Pike and Pyre. We will make the french, bolsheviks, and the brown shirts look like school girls.