“The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failur

—“The short history of Neo-Marxism was apparently motivated by the obvious failure of the communist East to build a better world, as evidenced by their brutal expansionism and mass slaughters of civilians. They also realized that the West was moving further and further away from appropriating Marx’s doctrines, so they started to concoct new plans. Just as Mao replaced Marx’s concept of the proletariat (trained factory workers) with the masses of unskilled survival farmers, the neo-Marxists foresaw that the Western “proletariat” would never go that route. Hence they started pushing the idea of the revolutionary potential of ALL MINORITY FRINGE GROUPS, such as the Unskilled Third World masses, the feminists and gender benders, the SJW, and lately also the BLM’s and others. They set up the dialectics in such a way that there is one core enemy: whites (esp attacking the traditional concepts of masculinity and feminity). What whites must learn if they are to survive, is that the debate about white survival has been put on the table by people with only one purpose in mind: destruction. The Muslim masses have come to play a central role in this. The core lessons are that these radicals should not be allowed to debate it (well they don’t really debate but shout and cry), and also that the ballot is NOT the forum to decide this.”—Tobie Louw