Theme: Crisis

  • (a) any further attempt to limit weapons will result in our cold civil war turni

    (a) any further attempt to limit weapons will result in our cold civil war turning hot.
    (b) all heterogeneous societies turn hostile.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 23:37:41 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981314827846148097

    Reply addressees: @TheGoodGodAbove

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981280508851126272


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981280508851126272

  • #YoutubeHQ Shooter Identified as Nasim Najafi Aghdam Iranian Woman. A REGISTERED

    #YoutubeHQ Shooter Identified as Nasim Najafi Aghdam

    Iranian Woman.

    A REGISTERED @DNC VOTER.

    PETA Activist

    Wearing Hijab at time of Shooting

    Because of Youtube Censorship.

    The shooter was identified as Nasim Aghdam who slammed YouTube for purportedly censoring her after she claimed that they demonetized her channels, including an exercise one devoted to exercise videos and another devoted to veganism. Aghdam channeled her anger toward YouTube into a manifesto published online. She wrote in her purported manifesto: “Be aware! Dictatorship exists in all countries but with different tactics! They only care for personal and short-term profits and do anything to reach their goals even by fooling simple-minded people, hiding the truth, manipulating science and everything, putting public mental and physical health at risk, abusing non-human animals, polluting the environment, destroying family values, promoting materialism and sexual degeneration in the name of freedom and turning people into programmed robots!”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 23:33:00 UTC

  • THE COLLAPSE MODEL OF HISTORY As far as I know the ‘Collapse’ model is correct:

    THE COLLAPSE MODEL OF HISTORY

    As far as I know the ‘Collapse’ model is correct: civilizations expand – like all human opportunities – until the underclasses, now enabled, conquer them.

    This is true for 3500 bc, 1200bc, 400ad, and 1900ad.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 16:04:00 UTC

  • “The choice is between suppressing the underclass via propertarian methods, or w

    —“The choice is between suppressing the underclass via propertarian methods, or watching society return to high infant mortality, ignorance, want and disease, never to rise again.”— Ryan Williams


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-03 16:01:00 UTC

  • On the Future of The British Isles (if Not All Scandinavia)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide. Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.) That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen. The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry. Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles). The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy. When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided. The value is not scale but smallness. The only value to scale is war. Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can. Move capital to people not people to capital. Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation. MOST IMPORTANTLY In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras. Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.* Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms. The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America. The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america. We are not capable of holding the flag any longer. We have been invaded by the third world. And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.
    Apr 02, 2018 12:16pm
  • On the Future of The British Isles (if Not All Scandinavia)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide. Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.) That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen. The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry. Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles). The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy. When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided. The value is not scale but smallness. The only value to scale is war. Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can. Move capital to people not people to capital. Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation. MOST IMPORTANTLY In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras. Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.* Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms. The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America. The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america. We are not capable of holding the flag any longer. We have been invaded by the third world. And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.
    Apr 02, 2018 12:16pm
  • PHYSICAL COLLAPSE OF A SOCIALIST STATEUpdated Apr 2, 2018, 7:32 PM

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2017/02/22/ca-the-physical-collapse-of-a-social-state/#628494d56bdbTHE PHYSICAL COLLAPSE OF A SOCIALIST STATEUpdated Apr 2, 2018, 7:32 PM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-02 19:32:00 UTC

  • ON THE FUTURE OF THE BRITISH ISLES (IF NOT ALL SCANDINAVIA) Economic consumption

    ON THE FUTURE OF THE BRITISH ISLES (IF NOT ALL SCANDINAVIA)

    Economic consumption is, like drugs, or religion, a comforting method of personal, familial, cultural, and political suicide.

    Some people think about their near term experiences, some about their children’s, some of their peoples long term horizons. (ie: the left, the libertarian, the right.)

    That which is unique about anglo civilization is incompatible with the faustian bargain that the french-and-german have chosen.

    The united states will have a second civil war soon because we have resisted returning to the european model of different states, and tried to preserve our inherited british empire in a world where we no longer possess economic and technological asymmetry.

    Meanwhile Europe, following the USA, assumes that she will achieve american economic and military prowess through unity. This might be possible if divided into protestant, catholic, orthodox civilizations just as american continuity might be possible if divided into Germanic (central), Scotts Irish(southern), Anglo (new england), white “Coastal Islanders” (seattle, portland, san francisco), and Jewish (New york city, Los Angeles).

    The fact is that the Han, Korean, and Japanese have won the argument: Homogeneity wins over the long term. Ethnicity wins over diversity. Executive government wins over democracy.

    When I watch the japanese and koreans and now the chinese, I still remember when we were like that – rather than a house, a thousand times divided.

    The value is not scale but smallness.

    The only value to scale is war.

    Small polities produce political, economic, and social equality -because they can.

    Move capital to people not people to capital.

    Equilibrate differences in production through trade negotiation.

    MOST IMPORTANTLY

    In the coming technological era, when not only phiysical labor but clerical labor is no longer productive, political economic and social asymmetry will increase dramatically, and the returns on popllitical control even more exacerbated than modern medieval and ancient eras.

    Ergo *the greatest advantage any demographic possesses is homogeneity and a continuously shrinking under class, lower class, and laboring class.*

    Let each group pay the costs of continuous modernization rather than burdening others. Thi sis the only way to create cooperative rather competing politics and norms.

    The future is Switzerland or the Levant/India/Brazil/South America.

    The Anglo Peoples, during the period of expansion, produced a continuous civilization of our own. Britain can either return to her leadership of our people, or continue to decline into a client state of either germany or america.

    We are not capable of holding the flag any longer.

    We have been invaded by the third world.

    And we will now have a civil ar to separate from them.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-02 12:16:00 UTC

  • MURDER RATE OVERTAKES NEW YORK CITY I have been saying this for twenty years: 1

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5566689/London-murder-rate-overtakes-New-York-time-including-11-killings-just-16-days.htmlLONDON MURDER RATE OVERTAKES NEW YORK CITY

    I have been saying this for twenty years:

    1 – diversity of cultures other than importing professionals is disastrous.

    2 – diversity of classes other than professionals is disastrous.

    3 – diversity of any population above 3% will affect you negatively, above 6% will create demands for political competition, and above 10% creates a competition that cannot be satisfied except by separatism.Updated Apr 1, 2018, 10:17 AM


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-01 10:17:00 UTC

  • Never, ever, ever happen, and all this is doing is bringing civil war closer and

    Never, ever, ever happen, and all this is doing is bringing civil war closer and closer.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-03-27 17:19:46 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978683008596275202

    Reply addressees: @jimgeraghty @FreeNortherner

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978622393651486720


    IN REPLY TO:

    @jimgeraghty

    I prefer a straightforward John Paul Stevens “repeal the Second Amendment” argument to the “we just want simple, commonsense solutions like Australia’s mandatory buyback program” double talk.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/978622393651486720