Theme: Crisis

  • You hear that? It’s a bit easier to hear now. That is the sound of civil war. Ju

    You hear that? It’s a bit easier to hear now. That is the sound of civil war. Just as expected, demographics, economies, technologies, shifts in power, all working together. And do you know why? It took the russians 200 years (((together))) and it only took us 100 years (((together))). Russia has exited the second attempt as a nation. The question is, how many more of us will exit as nations? Or will we turn into another Levant, India, Brazil, or africa? The future is not star trek. It’s Rio.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-06 14:50:00 UTC

  • #China is signaling, meaning they know that (a) the ‘Nuclear Option’ will be but

    #China is signaling, meaning they know that (a) the ‘Nuclear Option’ will be but a blip removing the threat, and (b) the worst that happens is that both countries get a new government. However, Americans get a new government every decade – peacefully. That’s not true for China.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-06 12:40:06 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/982236503391666177

  • #China is signaling, meaning they know that (a) the ‘Nuclear Option’ will be but

    #China is signaling, meaning they know that (a) the ‘Nuclear Option’ will be but a blip removing the threat, and (b) the worst that happens is that both countries get a new government. However, Americans get a new government every decade – peacefully. That’s not true for China.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-06 08:40:00 UTC

  • —“How will the petroyuan affect the future of the American economy?”—

    by T Michael Lutas via Quora Assuming that the petroyuan actually takes off, the US will have an inflationary impulse as petrodollars cycle back to the US at last and US Fed interest rates have to rise in order to soak them up. Assuming that the Fed doesn’t completely mishandle things, it will be a short term bump depending on the amount of petroyuan contracts. Strategically, the bigger the petroyuan, the less room China will have to continue on its current economic road, something that will greatly advantage the United States, if the US is smart enough to take advantage of it. China depends on economic manipulation to keep its economy going at a level far beyond what foreigners are comfortable with. China can survive the disapproval of these foreign governments and private economic players because the vast majority of yuan are kept within the borders of China where short selling yuan is not legal. The larger the yuan market outside of the PRC government control, the more likely someone will replicate George Soros’ feat when he broke the english pound. If anyone succeeds, they will make Soros look like a pauper. Alternatively, China could clean up its act, keep honest economic books, and merrily advance its way to real world power. But it keeps those books crooked for a reason. It is unlikely that the CCP would survive in its current role if those economic bookkeeping reforms were to happen. It is very likely that the CCP knows it because keeping crooked books is a tremendous source of inefficiency and economic misallocation for China and this is commonly known.

  • —“How will the petroyuan affect the future of the American economy?”—

    by T Michael Lutas via Quora Assuming that the petroyuan actually takes off, the US will have an inflationary impulse as petrodollars cycle back to the US at last and US Fed interest rates have to rise in order to soak them up. Assuming that the Fed doesn’t completely mishandle things, it will be a short term bump depending on the amount of petroyuan contracts. Strategically, the bigger the petroyuan, the less room China will have to continue on its current economic road, something that will greatly advantage the United States, if the US is smart enough to take advantage of it. China depends on economic manipulation to keep its economy going at a level far beyond what foreigners are comfortable with. China can survive the disapproval of these foreign governments and private economic players because the vast majority of yuan are kept within the borders of China where short selling yuan is not legal. The larger the yuan market outside of the PRC government control, the more likely someone will replicate George Soros’ feat when he broke the english pound. If anyone succeeds, they will make Soros look like a pauper. Alternatively, China could clean up its act, keep honest economic books, and merrily advance its way to real world power. But it keeps those books crooked for a reason. It is unlikely that the CCP would survive in its current role if those economic bookkeeping reforms were to happen. It is very likely that the CCP knows it because keeping crooked books is a tremendous source of inefficiency and economic misallocation for China and this is commonly known.

  • The Collapse Model of History

    As far as I know the ‘Collapse’ model is correct: civilizations expand – like all human opportunities – until the underclasses, now enabled, conquer them. This is true for 3500 bc, 1200bc, 400ad, and 1900ad.

  • The Collapse Model of History

    As far as I know the ‘Collapse’ model is correct: civilizations expand – like all human opportunities – until the underclasses, now enabled, conquer them. This is true for 3500 bc, 1200bc, 400ad, and 1900ad.

  • The united states was (and is not any longer) a great experiment that was ended

    The united states was (and is not any longer) a great experiment that was ended in the 1960’s because of vast underclass immigration. Most of the ‘good’ was from german and dutch immigrants. I admire the swiss and japanese. The rest are all ‘less’. I dislike chinese dishonesty.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 17:20:10 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981582211966226433

    Reply addressees: @Superhero_sky

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981581422963109888


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @Superhero_sky I prefer Corporate government in the Chinese (or German) model, insular strategy in the Han model, but northern european ethics, legal system, value of human life, arts – particularly our speaking the truth regardless of impact on the status hierarchy – and Slavic family culture.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/981581422963109888


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @Superhero_sky I prefer Corporate government in the Chinese (or German) model, insular strategy in the Han model, but northern european ethics, legal system, value of human life, arts – particularly our speaking the truth regardless of impact on the status hierarchy – and Slavic family culture.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/981581422963109888

  • China can tolerate greater harm because her political structure is willing to to

    China can tolerate greater harm because her political structure is willing to tolerate harm, rather than lose face. However, invalidating chinese debt, and closing all technological imports would lead to disintegration of the ruling party. So it is a question of culture not war.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 17:00:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981577366030954496

    Reply addressees: @Superhero_sky

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981574532858224640


    IN REPLY TO:

    @Superhero_sky

    @curtdoolittle 你觉得这次的贸易战谁会胜利

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/981574532858224640

  • 1 – “All human organizations evolve to maximize rents, until it is impossible fo

    1 – “All human organizations evolve to maximize rents, until it is impossible for those organizations to adapt to change or shocks.”

    2 – “Organizations that collapse due to the maximization of rents, and inability to adapt to shocks, do not recover.”

    3 – “Collapse is caused by competing organizations with fewer or lower accumulated rents – seeking military economic religious and demographic expansion.”

    4 -“Collapse is preventable by extermination of rents, by the preservation of markets for association, reproduction, production, production of commons, production of defense.”

    5 – “Markets in everything are producible by a government that shifts from redistributive(liberal), to productive(classical), to warfare (fascism) in response to changing circumstances.”

    6 – “Unfortunately, the human intuition is to pursue decreases in effort to calculate, and to maximize regularity, so that fringe opportunities are of the lowest cost to seize with the lowest need to organize to exploit them. And therefore, the human intuition is false (counter) at scale – as in all things. Those who seek regularity seek the luxury of freedom from adaptation”.

    7 – “ergo the only possible means of institutionalizing scale is markets in everything, under a government unable to institutionalize policies that provide discounts in exchange for reducing the ability to adapt to shocks.”

    8 – “that which does not kill you does in fact make you stronger, and the process of continually maintaining and building strength to resist the vicissitudes of man and nature, is produced via negativa : by preservation of competition in al things using markets in all things.”


    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-04 09:06:00 UTC