—“Curt, when do you think is the next economic / financial crisis slanted? Somebody I know well and trust, who got out of dodge last time around, is expecting it to be less than 18 months out, as indicated by the inverted bond yield curve. Is this accurate?”—- Moritz Bierling I have been saying that it looks to me like 2017-2020 since 2006. And that we would have some vast reorganizational catastrophe between 2020 and 2025. I was paying a lot of attention prior to the crisis, and so I was spot on (within 30 days) of estimating it correctly. Even the 2014 return. (I was conversely waaaaaaaaay off on China, which I thought would run out of options by 2010, but is deftly managing their equilibration and converting to totalitarianism before their great correction). I am not paying close enough attention to patterns today, so your friend is probably correct. I don’t need greater precision for my work. The reason being that I’m trying to provide “what to do about it” in advance – although still behind schedule. My understanding, and my strategy, is that we will see convergence in the next 24 months and that will begin the next ‘great wars’ era, because (a) the civil unrest will occupy the west, and (b) world powers in waiting will seize the opportunity, (c) both because they can afford to, and (d) because our ‘model’ (democracy) will have been proven wrong, so they will ‘advance’ under a sense of ‘moral authority to right a tragic wrong’. I think it is extremely unlikely that I err. Why? Humans always pursue available incentives. (PS: 1) I can tell by the loans being generated that we are at the limit of possible credit expansion and I suspect the bond yield is reflecting it. 2) I can tell by the absolutely certain future direction of oil prices that this will coincide with and partly drive the rest of the outcomes I anticipate.) Apr 19, 2018 12:19pm
Theme: Crisis
-
“Curt: When Will the Next Correction (collapse) Occur?”
—“Curt, when do you think is the next economic / financial crisis slanted? Somebody I know well and trust, who got out of dodge last time around, is expecting it to be less than 18 months out, as indicated by the inverted bond yield curve. Is this accurate?”—- Moritz Bierling I have been saying that it looks to me like 2017-2020 since 2006. And that we would have some vast reorganizational catastrophe between 2020 and 2025. I was paying a lot of attention prior to the crisis, and so I was spot on (within 30 days) of estimating it correctly. Even the 2014 return. (I was conversely waaaaaaaaay off on China, which I thought would run out of options by 2010, but is deftly managing their equilibration and converting to totalitarianism before their great correction). I am not paying close enough attention to patterns today, so your friend is probably correct. I don’t need greater precision for my work. The reason being that I’m trying to provide “what to do about it” in advance – although still behind schedule. My understanding, and my strategy, is that we will see convergence in the next 24 months and that will begin the next ‘great wars’ era, because (a) the civil unrest will occupy the west, and (b) world powers in waiting will seize the opportunity, (c) both because they can afford to, and (d) because our ‘model’ (democracy) will have been proven wrong, so they will ‘advance’ under a sense of ‘moral authority to right a tragic wrong’. I think it is extremely unlikely that I err. Why? Humans always pursue available incentives. (PS: 1) I can tell by the loans being generated that we are at the limit of possible credit expansion and I suspect the bond yield is reflecting it. 2) I can tell by the absolutely certain future direction of oil prices that this will coincide with and partly drive the rest of the outcomes I anticipate.) Apr 19, 2018 12:19pm
-
“CURT: WHEN WILL THE NEXT CORRECTION (COLLAPSE) OCCUR?” —“Curt, when do you th
“CURT: WHEN WILL THE NEXT CORRECTION (COLLAPSE) OCCUR?”
—“Curt, when do you think is the next economic / financial crisis slanted? Somebody I know well and trust, who got out of dodge last time around, is expecting it to be less than 18 months out, as indicated by the inverted bond yield curve. Is this accurate?”—- Moritz Bierling
I have been saying that it looks to me like 2017-2020 since 2006. And that we would have some vast reorganizational catastrophe between 2020 and 2025.
I was paying a lot of attention prior to the crisis, and so I was spot on (within 30 days) of estimating it correctly. Even the 2014 return.
(I was conversely waaaaaaaaay off on China, which I thought would run out of options by 2010, but is deftly managing their equilibration and converting to totalitarianism before their great correction).
I am not paying close enough attention to patterns today, so your friend is probably correct. I don’t need greater precision for my work. The reason being that I’m trying to provide “what to do about it” in advance – although still behind schedule.
My understanding, and my strategy, is that we will see convergence in the next 24 months and that will begin the next ‘great wars’ era, because (a) the civil unrest will occupy the west, and (b) world powers in waiting will seize the opportunity, (c) both because they can afford to, and (d) because our ‘model’ (democracy) will have been proven wrong, so they will ‘advance’ under a sense of ‘moral authority to right a tragic wrong’.
I think it is extremely unlikely that I err.
Why? Humans always pursue available incentives.
(PS:
1) I can tell by the loans being generated that we are at the limit of possible credit expansion and I suspect the bond yield is reflecting it.
2) I can tell by the absolutely certain future direction of oil prices that this will coincide with and partly drive the rest of the outcomes I anticipate.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 12:19:00 UTC
-
Some people bail water to relieve the pressure of the flood. Some people scribe
Some people bail water to relieve the pressure of the flood. Some people scribe a crack in the dam and let the sheer weight of the water do its work.
Almost all people on the right are the former kind, and I am the latter.
Western civilization unconsciously, out of habit, solves problems early, honestly, directly, and openly – as is necessary among a militia of peers.
However, this is not how one conducts war. A general does not seek valor, heroism, and sacrifice as much as indirection, asymmetry of conditions, and supply lines, during which valor, sacrifice, and heroism are obtained at least expense.
I’ve been criticized for my contra-populism for years and the reason is quite simple – populists bail water of immediacy, and generals simply identify all the dams, and where to scribe them so they break of their own accord, with the deluge doing the hard labor while we watch the destruction.
We have to do very little because the tolerance for non kin is the product of wealth and order. If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends.
The enemy always has the numbers. We did not conquer and rule the world because of our numbers, or our valor, but our social order, and our technology.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-19 10:59:00 UTC
-
knows this and knows nothing can be done about it
http://fortune.com/2017/09/19/racial-inequality-wealth-gap-america/Everyone knows this and knows nothing can be done about it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-18 09:46:00 UTC
-
Staying On Message: We Are Going Into A Conflict
I’m just staying on message: Understand we are going to enter into conflict. Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism. We will offer a solution then promise conflict. We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict. And then concentrate on what ‘works’. And they will fold rather quickly. And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out. And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments. Apr 17, 2018 12:20pm
-
Staying On Message: We Are Going Into A Conflict
I’m just staying on message: Understand we are going to enter into conflict. Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism. We will offer a solution then promise conflict. We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict. And then concentrate on what ‘works’. And they will fold rather quickly. And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out. And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments. Apr 17, 2018 12:20pm
-
I’m just staying on message: Understand we are going to enter into conflict. Und
I’m just staying on message:
Understand we are going to enter into conflict.
Understand we have offered no solution, just criticism.
We will offer a solution then promise conflict.
We will opportunistically pursue the three possible lines of conflict.
And then concentrate on what ‘works’.
And they will fold rather quickly.
And if not, we ‘win’ by starving them out.
And in not we ‘win’ by the ‘not us’ groups demonstrating their latent tendencies – removing all doubt about our arguments.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 12:20:00 UTC
-
THE ALT RIGHT IS OVER (instigation of discussion) by Christopher O’Brennan Charl
THE ALT RIGHT IS OVER
(instigation of discussion)
by Christopher O’Brennan
Charlottesville was a failure, but it set a precedent that people, normal people compared to the old school skinheads, can meet in real life to provide solidarity and change.
People traveled from all around the world be there. We shouldn’t do it again where people lose jobs or get arrested, but we should do something that capitalizes on these things.
I have to shill for the United States and the government whenever Russians are involved because they are our rival. I will continue to do so in good faith and loyalty until Americans shake off the libertarian persona towards a North American ethnostate where our Anti-Russian stance will flip.
Until people get serious in opposing the government with a counter American government (which would mean conflict), loyalty to the nation is expected. I feel that is a principled stance. I hope white russians and eastern europhiles can understand that its not personal, by being cool w Russia now under the heat of geopolitical saber rattlings means treason without reason, and that’s dumb.
The alt right is over.
What we have are libertarians civnats who too beta to confront the state. We have quasi-marxists who run around like idiots on the street until dear leader is embarrassed out of the movement. Then we have Roger Stone style anonymous assholes giggling like girls from the comfort of their basements putting dicks in each others mouths who fundamentally believe in nothing but their own craven egos. You have saturation of podcasts and media producers in it for the shekels and satisfying their trolls tearing each other down until there is nothing.
The alt right is dead. Clerical fascism, natsoc, propertarianism, traditional monarchism, and even a virtuous republicanism of honor rather than money will rise from those ashes.
The alt right was coined by Buchannanites, and later stolen by Richard Spencer to mix race with the post modern nastiness of Roger Stone style populist bullying.
It means nothing. They mean nothing. They do not represent me or my people who see their behavior, and believe they are bizarre retrobates.
We have to move forward to be who we were meant to be, and nip bad unnatural ideas in the bud.
We cannot maintain demographics when we do not control the state or state policy. We cannot maintain normative institutional influence if we at under siege by the state. We cannot maintain territorial control if we cannot own our own institutions. Therefore we must move beyond the silly culture of the Alt Right into the right.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-17 07:29:00 UTC
-
I mean, the cosmopolitan counter-revolution against science is ending right? Fas
I mean, the cosmopolitan counter-revolution against science is ending right? Fascism is gradually taking hold. Nationalism gradually taking hold. Marx, Freud, Boas and the Postmoderns falsified, and Dawin, Spencer, and Nietzsche were right.
Source date (UTC): 2018-04-15 21:31:35 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/985631747261026304