Curt Doolittle

Theme: Crisis

  • 7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban

    7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban centers by serial overloading (shorting) of power lines, and cutting of transmission lines. That is one of only a hundred similar techniques that do not require armed conflict.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:16:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989553937157181440

    Reply addressees: @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989553146035933184

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989553146035933184

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989553146035933184

  • 2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be

    2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be so trivially brought about. Not just because of a small number of men, but because, like the fall of the roman empire, the basis of our civilization (military service and common law) has be undermined

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:04:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989550705353592837

    Reply addressees: @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584

    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584

    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584

  • 1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the

    1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 17:02:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989550338108739584

    Reply addressees: @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989549419107405824

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/989549419107405824

  • THE POSSIBILITY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION Replying to @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    THE POSSIBILITY OF AMERICAN REVOLUTION

    Replying to @DiasporaDiabhal @thefaceberg

    1) While historically a small percentage (under 3%) of unwed males have been the cause for most revolutions (men being a surplus resource of violence like any other resource) it is trivial at this point in time for very small numbers to bring an end to the american government.

    2) In fact I cannot think of a time in history where such a revolution would be so trivially brought about. Not just because of a small number of men, but because, like the fall of the roman empire, the basis of our civilization (military service and common law) has been undermined and the common man married or not are in rebellious mood.

    3) In the ancient world, judaism was invented to resist, christianity to subvert, then islam used to conquer, and destroy all the great civilizations of the ancient world, creating the Abrahamic Dark Ages. So immigration of hostiles, the conversion of our women and underclass….

    4) Localized rebellion, invasion, the costs of land vs marine policing, the plagues, and the islamic conquest of mediterranean and indian ocean trade, combined with a surplus of males able to retreat into deserts, destroyed every single great civilization between 100 and 1200 …

    5) … with the Fresh Reserves of newly islamicized Turks, assisted by plague. accomplishing what the exhausted arabs could not in 1453. It took until 1683 to exhaust the Turks, who could not govern the arabs either. So we have fought islam for 1400 years.

    6) And so far, only China, Japan, and Korea, on one end, and America on the other, have resisted the Muslim Conquests. Today muslims are accomplishing through migration what they could not achieve through martial means. It’s just numbers.

    7) So imagine something as simple as cutting off EBT (welfare payments) to urban centers by serial overloading (shorting) of power lines, and cutting of transmission lines. That is one of only a hundred similar techniques that do not require armed conflict so much as “just letting the pressure of the dam, do its work”.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 13:16:00 UTC

  • THE MYTHOS OF NAZI GENERAL PLAN OST All general staffs develop war plans. The wa

    THE MYTHOS OF NAZI GENERAL PLAN OST

    All general staffs develop war plans. The war plan to use asymmetric warfare against ukraine was produced somewhere between 2010 and 2012. Every single general staff in the world has hundreds of such plans. They vary from the trivial, to the devious, to the genocidal. That is what general staffs do. Yet these plans are rarely if ever used. The american Plan Red was to conquer canada so that the british couldn’t for example (I know this because they bought my great-grandparents farm to use as an airport in case they needed to put the plan into action. The plans that are currently in the russian (and soviet) archives are horrific, and include nuclear saturation of the west, and rapid movement of artillery and armor through that territory. There are plans to take finland, to take sweden, to defend from china, to take back constantinople. These are not likely to happen, but they are the research and development plans that all general staffs occupy their time with so that they are NEVER in a position of lacking a plan for any possible contingency.

    Generalplan Ost existed in six only in preliminary versions from January 1940 to the last one dated 23. Dec. 1942 named “Generalsiedlungsplan”.

    The plan was subject to a continuous ongoing development, and no version of it was ever approved.

    Further development of the plan was abandoned in 1943.

    The 2′nd, 3′rd and 4′th versions of the plan have never been found. Their existence and content is only known from other secondary documentary references.

    In other words, this is more propaganda. As far as I know the general solution was to resettle people in order to prevent communist expansion from the soviets into european spaces where it could threaten germans.

    Fascism was a reaction to soviet communism. That’s all.

    Just as russians today want to defend their ‘resettled’ people in eastern europe, (despite the fact that they are despised in every country), the germans wanted to defend their settled peoples, because they had been incrementally civilizing europe through commerce since the beginning of the Hansa league.

    I never believe anyone’s history. I look at the economics, and the demographics, and search for incentives. People just make excuses to justify seizure of opportunities. And history is nothing but such excuses.

    The only measure of a people is trust and the technical, and economic velocity that results from it.

    The measure of any philosophy or ideology is the long term condition of those who practice it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-26 10:57:00 UTC

  • This is where we all will end up. We need to act

    This is where we all will end up. We need to act.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-04-24 18:16:00 UTC

  • The Decline of Prosperous Cities

    https://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2018/04/18/a-mayors-most-important-job-n2471301 from Walter Williams: —“When World War II ended, Washington, D.C.’s population was about 900,000; today it’s about 700,000. In 1950, Baltimore’s population was almost 950,000; today it’s around 614,000. Detroit’s 1950 population was close to 1.85 million; today it’s down to 673,000. Camden, New Jersey’s 1950 population was nearly 125,000; today it has fallen to 77,000. St. Louis’ 1950 population was more than 856,000; today it’s less than 309,000. A similar story of population decline can be found in most of our formerly large and prosperous cities. In some cities, population declines since 1950 are well over 50 percent. In addition to Detroit and St. Louis, those would include Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”— (via Anoop Verma) Apr 19, 2018 8:18am

  • The Decline of Prosperous Cities

    https://townhall.com/columnists/walterewilliams/2018/04/18/a-mayors-most-important-job-n2471301 from Walter Williams: —“When World War II ended, Washington, D.C.’s population was about 900,000; today it’s about 700,000. In 1950, Baltimore’s population was almost 950,000; today it’s around 614,000. Detroit’s 1950 population was close to 1.85 million; today it’s down to 673,000. Camden, New Jersey’s 1950 population was nearly 125,000; today it has fallen to 77,000. St. Louis’ 1950 population was more than 856,000; today it’s less than 309,000. A similar story of population decline can be found in most of our formerly large and prosperous cities. In some cities, population declines since 1950 are well over 50 percent. In addition to Detroit and St. Louis, those would include Cleveland and Pittsburgh.”— (via Anoop Verma) Apr 19, 2018 8:18am

  • Some Of Us Must Be Generals

    Some people bail water to relieve the pressure of the flood. Some people scribe a crack in the dam and let the sheer weight of the water do its work. Almost all people on the right are the former kind, and I am the latter. Western civilization unconsciously, out of habit, solves problems early, honestly, directly, and openly – as is necessary among a militia of peers. However, this is not how one conducts war. A general does not seek valor, heroism, and sacrifice as much as indirection, asymmetry of conditions, and supply lines, during which valor, sacrifice, and heroism are obtained at least expense. I’ve been criticized for my contra-populism for years and the reason is quite simple – populists bail water of immediacy, and generals simply identify all the dams, and where to scribe them so they break of their own accord, with the deluge doing the hard labor while we watch the destruction. We have to do very little because the tolerance for non kin is the product of wealth and order. If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends. The enemy always has the numbers. We did not conquer and rule the world because of our numbers, or our valor, but our social order, and our technology.

  • Some Of Us Must Be Generals

    Some people bail water to relieve the pressure of the flood. Some people scribe a crack in the dam and let the sheer weight of the water do its work. Almost all people on the right are the former kind, and I am the latter. Western civilization unconsciously, out of habit, solves problems early, honestly, directly, and openly – as is necessary among a militia of peers. However, this is not how one conducts war. A general does not seek valor, heroism, and sacrifice as much as indirection, asymmetry of conditions, and supply lines, during which valor, sacrifice, and heroism are obtained at least expense. I’ve been criticized for my contra-populism for years and the reason is quite simple – populists bail water of immediacy, and generals simply identify all the dams, and where to scribe them so they break of their own accord, with the deluge doing the hard labor while we watch the destruction. We have to do very little because the tolerance for non kin is the product of wealth and order. If we remove the wealth and order, then the tolerance, like the dam will end, and the natural pressure of the conflict will produce deterministic ends. The enemy always has the numbers. We did not conquer and rule the world because of our numbers, or our valor, but our social order, and our technology.