[S]o the Church failed to reform in the 1800’s and were replaced by secular judaism in western garb in the 1900’s, and we are being invaded by muslims in the current era: the church FAILED. Ergo,what NEW religion replaces Democratic secular socialist humanism? Nationalism it seems.
Theme: Crisis
-
When to Revolution Men Bend Their Will How Soon They Find Worthy, Those Heady In
When to Revolution Men Bend Their Will How Soon They Find Worthy, Those Heady Instruments of ill.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 17:25:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058409705767350272
-
ANN COULTER WILL FIRE THE FIRST SHOT. That is all it will take
ANN COULTER WILL FIRE THE FIRST SHOT.
That is all it will take.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 17:21:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058408717463498752
-
So the Church failed to reform in the 1800’s and were replaced by secular judais
So the Church failed to reform in the 1800’s and were replaced by secular judaism in western garb in the 1900’s, and we are being invaded by muslims in the current era: the church FAILED. Ergo,what NEW religion replaces Democratic secular socialist humanism? Nationalism it seems.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 16:19:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058393127013232641
Reply addressees: @brenden_frost
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058363333009702913
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058363333009702913
-
ANN COULTER WILL FIRE THE FIRST SHOT. That is all it will take
ANN COULTER WILL FIRE THE FIRST SHOT.
That is all it will take.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 13:21:00 UTC
-
So the Church failed to reform in the 1800’s and were replaced by secular judais
So the Church failed to reform in the 1800’s and were replaced by secular judaism in western garb in the 1900’s, and we are being invaded by muslims in the current era: the church FAILED. Ergo,what NEW religion replaces Democratic secular socialist humanism? Nationalism it seems.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 12:20:00 UTC
-
“I am curious as to how you haven’t been de-platformed yet Curt, with your open
—“I am curious as to how you haven’t been de-platformed yet Curt, with your open advocacy of revolution? Is it just because your language is academic enough for the hate speech bots to skim over?”— James Fox Higgins
Well there are keywords I avoid because they HAVE caught me, but usually FB lets me back on after an appeal. Lately they don’t even block me just take down a post if it’s not cool (which is what I THINK they should do).
1) I don’t engage in hate at all ever, but nationalism for all as a solution to our conflicts.
2) I never cross the line into advocacy of action
3) I’m warning revolution will come, not encouraging it
4) My solution (law) will prevent the revolution in exchange for constitutional reformation (and its a libertarian solution)
5) I have participated in class actions before, and have worked for the justice department and for the three letter acronym org, and suppression of the kind of speech I make just gives me opportunity for actions. And so (a) an intellectual, not a risk, (b) I won’t ‘inflame’ the idiot-crowd, (c) any attempt to frame me as otherwise just provides me with leverage in court.
6) and YES, it takes a lot of IQ points to understand WTF I am talking about – and that is by design.
The whole point of increasing the probability of revolutionary violence is to prevent it from happening.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 18:58:00 UTC
-
Ok. We Are Here. Npr Is Talking About Revolution
October 31st, 2018 5:56 PM [T]his is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic. While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency. So when I started out and said: 1) we are going to have a revolution 2) nothing can stop it. 3) all we can do is control it. 4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan 5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incentives that the majority of the population will not RESIST. 6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards. 7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution. 8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist. I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future. Cheers
-
Ok. We Are Here. Npr Is Talking About Revolution
October 31st, 2018 5:56 PM [T]his is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic. While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency. So when I started out and said: 1) we are going to have a revolution 2) nothing can stop it. 3) all we can do is control it. 4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan 5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incentives that the majority of the population will not RESIST. 6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards. 7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution. 8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist. I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future. Cheers
-
OK. WE ARE HERE. NPR IS TALKING ABOUT REVOLUTION OK. This is worth a video, but
OK. WE ARE HERE. NPR IS TALKING ABOUT REVOLUTION
OK. This is worth a video, but in short, when I said in 06, the correction would happen in 08, recover by 14, tinker along till 17, and that we would have a revolution by 2020 to 2025 at the latest, I was correct. Why? Because DEMOGRAPHICS IS DESTINY: Demographic outcomes are deterministic.
While it’s true that the left are NPC’s, it’s also true that the right is empirical. But without a THEORETICAL basis of social science to PREDICT, alter, and adapt to outcomes, one lacks agency.
SO when I started out and said:
1) we are going to have a revolution
2) nothing can stop it.
3) all we can do is control it.
4) the optimum means of controlling it is to provide a plan
5) that plan needs to provide sufficient incenties that the majority of the population will not RESIST.
6) because they won’t resist if the obtain material, emotional, and intellectual, rewards.
7) And because we have removed the ‘doubt’ (uncertainty) as to the function of a polity after that revolution.
8) And to provide greater fear of uncertainty due to revolutionary chaos if they DO resist.
I wasn’t wrong before, I haven’t been wrong so far, and I won’t be wrong in the future.
Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 17:56:00 UTC