“I am curious as to how you haven’t been de-platformed yet Curt, with your open

—“I am curious as to how you haven’t been de-platformed yet Curt, with your open advocacy of revolution? Is it just because your language is academic enough for the hate speech bots to skim over?”— James Fox Higgins

Well there are keywords I avoid because they HAVE caught me, but usually FB lets me back on after an appeal. Lately they don’t even block me just take down a post if it’s not cool (which is what I THINK they should do).

1) I don’t engage in hate at all ever, but nationalism for all as a solution to our conflicts.

2) I never cross the line into advocacy of action

3) I’m warning revolution will come, not encouraging it

4) My solution (law) will prevent the revolution in exchange for constitutional reformation (and its a libertarian solution)

5) I have participated in class actions before, and have worked for the justice department and for the three letter acronym org, and suppression of the kind of speech I make just gives me opportunity for actions. And so (a) an intellectual, not a risk, (b) I won’t ‘inflame’ the idiot-crowd, (c) any attempt to frame me as otherwise just provides me with leverage in court.

6) and YES, it takes a lot of IQ points to understand WTF I am talking about – and that is by design.

The whole point of increasing the probability of revolutionary violence is to prevent it from happening.