Curt Doolittle

Theme: Crisis

  • I Will Not Let Rome Fall Twice.

    Feb 2, 2020, 8:44 AM

    I will not let Rome fall twice.

    THE LEFT RIGHT DIVIDE IN SIMPLE TERMS

    ...............Right....Left
.........evidentiary....experiential
........capitalizing....consumptive
......inter-temporal....temporal
..........reciprocal....proportional
........meritocratic....equalitarian
....falsificationary....justificationary
.............eugenic....dysgenic
...............truth....approval
................male....female
...............trade....seduction
.........deprivation....ostracization
...............force....undermining
................pack....herd
.............Markets....Monopolies
.........Nationalism....Globalism

    Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status). And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval. And all consciousness of the self is just to facilitate the problem of balancing our incentives with the incentives of others. The only solutions to the present conflict are :

    1. Markets for Commons, 2. Separation and Specialization 3. Civil War and Winner Take All I prefer the latter, I will morally compromise on either of the former. I will not let Rome fall twice.

  • I Will Not Let Rome Fall Twice.

    Feb 2, 2020, 8:44 AM

    I will not let Rome fall twice.

    THE LEFT RIGHT DIVIDE IN SIMPLE TERMS

    ...............Right....Left
.........evidentiary....experiential
........capitalizing....consumptive
......inter-temporal....temporal
..........reciprocal....proportional
........meritocratic....equalitarian
....falsificationary....justificationary
.............eugenic....dysgenic
...............truth....approval
................male....female
...............trade....seduction
.........deprivation....ostracization
...............force....undermining
................pack....herd
.............Markets....Monopolies
.........Nationalism....Globalism

    Cognitively left dysgenic female herd vs cognitively right eugenic male pack. We have no agency. We we are gene machines pursuing our reproductive strategies adapting them only to our class (status). And all speech and most importantly, all political speech is either truthful, reciprocal, meritocratic (hierarchical male right) or untruthful, irreciprocal, proportional (equalitarian female left). Right trade and truth and Left Seduction disapproval. And all consciousness of the self is just to facilitate the problem of balancing our incentives with the incentives of others. The only solutions to the present conflict are :

    1. Markets for Commons, 2. Separation and Specialization 3. Civil War and Winner Take All I prefer the latter, I will morally compromise on either of the former. I will not let Rome fall twice.

  • The University System Is Organized for Unsustainable Growth

    Feb 2, 2020, 9:02 AM

    —“unpromising future for economics phd’s”—

    This is correct of course. It’s one of Eric Weinstein’s complaints: the university system is organized for unsustainable growth, false-promising careers to researchers that can’t exist, in order to obtain cheap research labor (and cheap immigrant research labor) rather than paying researchers and doing less and better research. This problem is exacerbated by the withdrawal of the military as the primary originator of basic research funds given that military epistemology is competitive, and our failure or inability to direct research funds without military priorities, to competitive advantage. I expect this will be corrected rather shortly (and painfully) one way or the other.

  • The University System Is Organized for Unsustainable Growth

    Feb 2, 2020, 9:02 AM

    —“unpromising future for economics phd’s”—

    This is correct of course. It’s one of Eric Weinstein’s complaints: the university system is organized for unsustainable growth, false-promising careers to researchers that can’t exist, in order to obtain cheap research labor (and cheap immigrant research labor) rather than paying researchers and doing less and better research. This problem is exacerbated by the withdrawal of the military as the primary originator of basic research funds given that military epistemology is competitive, and our failure or inability to direct research funds without military priorities, to competitive advantage. I expect this will be corrected rather shortly (and painfully) one way or the other.

  • China’s Fascism Shows Its Ends

    Feb 2, 2020, 11:14 AM China’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it. China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.

    — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM CHINA—- Huoshenshan Hospital has been completed in #Wuhan on Sunday. Only 10 days to build. 4,000+ workers. 1000s of equipment. days and nights of work. 34,000-square-meter. 1000 beds available on Monday. —-END—

    —“Fascism isn’t state capitalist. it doesn’t take sides on economics, it applies pressure on markets as the situation demands. If you want to read anything about Fascist Economics, I’d recommend, The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Enzig And Hitler’s Revolution by R. Tedor”– A ( Intelligent and Informed) Friend

    Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state:

    (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing); (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing; (c) overrides market incentives when needed. So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in markets except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

    —“A fascist wouldn’t consider the state as anything as reductive as a customer. Or anything of the sort. The state is the arbiter of the people, it IS the people. “All within the state, Nothing outside the State, Nothing against the State” the state comes before all else.”—Hauptgefreitersiege @Hauptgefreiter1

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from Rousseau to Kant to Marx to present – Europe is ‘stuck’. But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good. Hugs brother. Thanks for letting me riff on your comment.

  • China’s Fascism Shows Its Ends

    Feb 2, 2020, 11:14 AM China’s Response to disaster vs America’s: This is the value of a Fascist State (Where fascist means Ethnonationalist, Authoritarian, State Capitalist, Mandatory Conformist.) And people prefer it. China demonstrated that Fascism won the 20th. Heterogeneous Immigration demonstrated that Democracy lost the 20th.

    — REGARDING THIS ARTICLE FROM CHINA—- Huoshenshan Hospital has been completed in #Wuhan on Sunday. Only 10 days to build. 4,000+ workers. 1000s of equipment. days and nights of work. 34,000-square-meter. 1000 beds available on Monday. —-END—

    —“Fascism isn’t state capitalist. it doesn’t take sides on economics, it applies pressure on markets as the situation demands. If you want to read anything about Fascist Economics, I’d recommend, The Economic Foundations of Fascism by Paul Enzig And Hitler’s Revolution by R. Tedor”– A ( Intelligent and Informed) Friend

    Hitler wasn’t the only fascist – he was just the last. So yes, the state:

    (a) prevents contra-autarkic arbitrage for profit and exploitation of state resources (the same thing); (b) biases production to commons by use of state financing; (c) overrides market incentives when needed. So we can fuss around with terms. But the bias in private capitalism is non interference in markets except by treating the state as just another customer, while state capitalism places higher priority on state as a customer than the market – particularly international market.

    —“A fascist wouldn’t consider the state as anything as reductive as a customer. Or anything of the sort. The state is the arbiter of the people, it IS the people. “All within the state, Nothing outside the State, Nothing against the State” the state comes before all else.”—Hauptgefreitersiege @Hauptgefreiter1

    This is a secular theological, or philosophical, rather than scientific or operational description. I understand the “strange’ continental obsession with restoring the theology of the church with some secular theology – from Rousseau to Kant to Marx to present – Europe is ‘stuck’. But this point of view is one of an anglo who descends from the minor aristocracy, and the puritanical, empirical, common law tradition. We can understand the continent but the continent cannot understand us. We escaped even secular theology – I just don’t know if it was good. Hugs brother. Thanks for letting me riff on your comment.

  • The Retreat and Regroup Strategy

    The Retreat and Regroup Strategy https://propertarianism.com/2020/05/24/the-retreat-and-regroup-strategy/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-24 20:28:00 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1264654404256436224

  • The Retreat and Regroup Strategy

    Feb 2, 2020, 6:58 PM by Jake Anders Gotbanned I’m going to start by saying I do not advocate violence and I myself am not planning on doing so . That being said we are already a minority amongst gen z and we have millions of legal and illegal immigrants poring over our borders every year. We will never win by voting and the people that can be red pulled already are . What we have to do now is move into the areas that are already white dominated and start electing our own people Curt Doolittle would be a good choice. It’s perfectly legal and nothing they can legally do about it. Obviously this will spur on some kind of conflict but we stand a chance at winning if we have governance over our own cities towns states etc. We will have state money and weapons. The problem with the proper who dreams of civil war is the fact that he is all by himself. Training by yourself is better than nothing at all but not much if you don’t have a team of men who are also trained with you then you don’t stand a chance at all if the unfortunate event of civil war did happen. You need to be meeting irl not just for prepper shoot em up tactics but building businesses with each other starting homesteading growing your own food there is an estimated 40 million of white nationalist in America think of what we can do if we all moved to the Pacific northwest and apalachicola mountains region and had our small little tightknit tribes who were self sufficient? And all of this can be done in small steps and its perfectly legal look into harold Covington of north west front and shield wall balkanization seems to be the only way forward and again I’m not advocating violence etc I’m advocating preparing for the possibility of violence being done to us

  • The Retreat and Regroup Strategy

    Feb 2, 2020, 6:58 PM by Jake Anders Gotbanned I’m going to start by saying I do not advocate violence and I myself am not planning on doing so . That being said we are already a minority amongst gen z and we have millions of legal and illegal immigrants poring over our borders every year. We will never win by voting and the people that can be red pulled already are . What we have to do now is move into the areas that are already white dominated and start electing our own people Curt Doolittle would be a good choice. It’s perfectly legal and nothing they can legally do about it. Obviously this will spur on some kind of conflict but we stand a chance at winning if we have governance over our own cities towns states etc. We will have state money and weapons. The problem with the proper who dreams of civil war is the fact that he is all by himself. Training by yourself is better than nothing at all but not much if you don’t have a team of men who are also trained with you then you don’t stand a chance at all if the unfortunate event of civil war did happen. You need to be meeting irl not just for prepper shoot em up tactics but building businesses with each other starting homesteading growing your own food there is an estimated 40 million of white nationalist in America think of what we can do if we all moved to the Pacific northwest and apalachicola mountains region and had our small little tightknit tribes who were self sufficient? And all of this can be done in small steps and its perfectly legal look into harold Covington of north west front and shield wall balkanization seems to be the only way forward and again I’m not advocating violence etc I’m advocating preparing for the possibility of violence being done to us

  • (placeholder) ( … undone … )

    Feb 3, 2020, 10:05 AM (discuss incentives that produce conspiracies of common interest – and managed decline/equilibrium)(real conspiracy is ‘all’ rather than each nation competing an the market driving all upward) TRILATERAL COMMISSION WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM – DAVOS BILDERBERG GROUP CONFERNECE MOUNT PELERIN SOCIETY WORLD BANK G7, WTO – World Trade Organization, IMF – International Monetary Fund, THE UNITED NATIONS “Davos Man” “Davos Man” is a neologism referring to the global elite of wealthy (predominantly) men, whose members view themselves as completely “international”. According to political scientist Samuel P. Huntington, who is credited with inventing the phrase “Davos Man”,[88] they are people who “have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the élite’s global operations”. In his 2004 article “Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite”, Huntington argues that this international perspective is a minority elitist position not shared by the nationalist majority of the people.[89] Davos men supposedly see their identity as a matter of personal choice, not an accident of birth. John Fonte of the Hudson Institute has suggested that the transnational ideology of Davos Man represents a major challenge to Francis Fukuyama’s assertion that liberal democracy represents the fulfillment of The End of History and the Last Man. Hernando de Soto Polar said that although internationally connected, each country’s elite lives in a bell jar in the sense of being out of touch with its own populace. Their isolation fosters a tendency to be oblivious to the fate of their fellow citizens. Lawrence Summers refers to this concept as the “stateless elites”, tied more to the success of the global economy than to any nation, and views it as eroding support for continuing globalization