Theme: Cooperation

  • Simple terms, rule of law of natural law resulting time preference, high trust a

    Simple terms, rule of law of natural law resulting time preference, high trust and cooperative, economic, and evolutionary velocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 19:22:49 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660727936876511236

    Reply addressees: @Book_of_Rules

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660723559998603264

  • WHY DO HUMANS GENERATE DEMAND FOR “RELIGION”? (whether scientific, philosophical

    WHY DO HUMANS GENERATE DEMAND FOR “RELIGION”?
    (whether scientific, philosophical, mythological, or theological)

    Religion does not need to solve the problem of the universe, since there are tribes with no consiousness of such a thing. Religion solves the problem of alienation caused by anonymity as populations scale.

    Religion universally ‘works’ by creating a ‘debt’ perception which provokes our submission response, which when practiced together reduces aggression into non-aggression.

    When combined with prosociality of the the feast celebration (post-hunt feast), and the prosociality post feast, we generate a sense of indifference if not equality that sedates our alienation.

    Mythology then creates explanations that further reduce alienation by producing additional mindfulness.

    Lastly, standards of behavior produce ‘weights and measures’ that preven aggressions that allow cooperation at scale, allowing families, clans, tribes, and nations to cooperate desipte the idiosyncratic traditions and myths they developmed on their own.

    So that is why religions grow and change with population trade and political organization: weights and measures of non-aggression, producing mindfulness despite pervasive alienation.

    Its a human bias to assume the universe started or needed to start. The universe exists. We do not know which model of the universe is correct. (a) It may be that there is one local bubble, ours, that expands and contracts or expands and dissipates (b) or that there is a ‘froth’ of bubbles (a multiverse) each of which expands and dissipates, or expands and collapses (c) or if the universe is infinite and within it are periodic explosions that create regions we call universes that expand and dissipate (d) or if there is something larger than the universe as we see it producing the pressure (energy) we observe in our universe. (e) it is not even clear that our theories of expansion and redshift are correct, and it might be that what we call the big bang(s) occur everywhere at once etc. (f) And worse, we are not clear that time has any meaning given that while sequence exists but that time is determined by the rate of change of all within the universe dependent upon energy density of the quantum background and rate of speed as anything travels through it. In other words time may only exist during and within any given universe and be irrelevant outside of it.

    And the odd (absurd) contradiction is made by those who claim that such a unverse couldn’t be eternal, and therefore must be started by magical entity that is eternal? 😉

    One need only say “I don’t know”. I don’t know which of those is true, but that’s the best information we have – and to have confidence (real), not faith (supernatural) in man’s demonstrated ability TO know – gradually, fitfully, but with near certainty. (At least western man’s. Other civs aren’t very good at ‘truth’.)

    Conversely we have the odd human anthropomorphic vain self delusion that any entity external to the universe, of the universe or in the universe we live in, cares a whit about us given that the universe is a vast irradiated wastely hostile to all life.

    Life is deterministic. It will occur if it can. It’s just very difficult to do so given the hostility of the universe.

    Cheers

    Reply addressees: @Stealth_Bandit @thedualMan


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 15:23:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660667601071079426

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660544060896198657

  • Good point. Thinking…. Do they purity spiral internally or only externally? Wh

    Good point. Thinking….

    Do they purity spiral internally or only externally? While the right purity spirals internally? Are they loyal (bear costs over time) or devoted (only in time)?

    Left’s moral intuition is narrow (harm-care, fairness-equality), and almost exclusive. Right’s moral intuition is broad ( adding liberty-reciprocity, order-hierarchy, loyalty-responsibility, sacred-purity-disgust).

    So, the right distributes it’s goals from the libertarian to the authoritarian seeking responsibility by different means exacerbated by self overconfidence in the absence of hierarchy producing factions. The left concentrates it’s goals on evasion of responsibility and submits to the herd eliminating the need for hierarchy, limiting factions.

    The right seeks a quick solution (problem solving) the left uses continuous undermining (basically nagging).

    Reply addressees: @whatifalthist @ConceptualJames


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 04:36:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660504871856947200

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660500596556812289

  • Purity spiraling is precisely why everyone other than the left loses and why the

    Purity spiraling is precisely why everyone other than the left loses and why they win. “My way is the only way” is just impractical masculine infantilism. Virtue signaling bravado that’s contrary to the evidence. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-21 17:11:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660332605105946626

    Reply addressees: @ConceptualJames

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660328582990708740

  • I’m not sure why this isn’t understood, but maybe I need to do a video on the fi

    I’m not sure why this isn’t understood, but maybe I need to do a video on the first rule of grand strategy:

    Given three factions A, B, C. Where A is the largest and most powerful, then B, then C. Where A can defeat B or C but not B and C, even if B and C are enemies, B and C both benefit from an alliance against A.

    You are C imagining you can defeat B and A.
    Christians are the weakest group, ethnonationalists less weak, constitutionalists less weak, civic nationalists less weak, neoliberals and internationalists strongest.

    Why? Everyone stronger than you prefers everyone stronger than they are to you who are weaker. And it’s because you demonstrate you’re irresponsible. And that’s because you’re anti-intellectual.

    We’ve tried to provide an intellectual foundation to help you but you’ve played the purity spiral game with us as you have with everyone. And you’re losing because of your purity spiral. When the people who win just keep taking advantage of every incremental opportunity – they don’t get caught up in self destructive purity spirals.

    You’re being exterminated because you’re anti intellectual impulsive, and self impressed with a purity that means. you’re outcasts of everyone who could ally with you.

    You’re like women who assume they have sexual market value but don’t. You act like you matter. But by your actions you insure that you don’t.

    No I don’t like this situation. But it’s how it is. And there is no way to fix it. We’ve tried.

    Reply addressees: @xBronqo


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-21 14:33:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660292839257808897

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660274365697597443

  • They may not be, but against the enemy they are allies

    They may not be, but against the enemy they are allies.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-21 03:21:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660123722123030528

    Reply addressees: @texas_trumper11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660121477516066817

  • Love and respect you Andrew, but anyone who moves the needle is contributing. An

    Love and respect you Andrew, but anyone who moves the needle is contributing. And the weakness of the right originates in our demand for absolute agreement that create factions, combined with the disagreeableness and overconfidence of the demonstrably not competent when it comes… https://twitter.com/BasedTorba/status/1660121005505888257


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-21 03:20:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660123469843922944

  • RT @WalterIII: “We must provide man the incentive to choose cooperation. We must

    RT @WalterIII: “We must provide man the incentive to choose cooperation. We must not pretend he does not need the incentive.” –Curt Dooli…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-20 01:40:51 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659735909552603136

  • WHY TRUST MATTERS (civ differences) Races, Civilizations, Countries, Ethnicities

    WHY TRUST MATTERS
    (civ differences)

    Races, Civilizations, Countries, Ethnicities, Classes and Sexes demonstrate very different levels of ingroup as well as outgroup trust. In general, IQ and Trust are the most causal and correspondent predictors of the condition of a people. if you have low IQ and low trust you will have worse life, family, economy, government, and comparative advantage.

    Unfortunately, the west sells democracy, which is a privilege of successful implementation rule of law by the natural law, producing the resulting trust and economic velocity, and resulting prosperity, rather than selling rule of law and resulting trust and resulting prosperity that provides the opportunity for the luxury of democracy.

    Civilizational Differences:
    Africa: Trustlessness
    MENA Facelessness: heroism for lying on behalf of self family clan tribe or cult.
    E Asia: Face before Truth (heavy) – in cline from china to s. korea and japan.
    India: Face before Truth (‘lite’)
    Europe: Truth before face – in a cline from western(germanic) to southern(latin) to eastern (slavic) to Russian.

    See: Fukuyama’s “Trust”.

    Reply addressees: @Max33359315 @elonmusk @krassenstein @mattyglesias


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-14 18:46:52 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657819787186040835

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657763665557467137

  • You might mean that sex differences create an adversarial competition between mi

    You might mean that sex differences create an adversarial competition between mirror interests for the identification of opportunities for reciprocoal cooperation, identifying means of adaptation producing evolutionary computation.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-13 19:31:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657468523273236482

    Reply addressees: @peanutweanut666

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1657467368556339201