Theme: Cooperation

WHY ARE THE WOMEN IN OUR MOVEMENT “KEEPERS”?

All the women who are somehow attached to our movement are ‘keepers’. And one thing is obvious when you spend time with them: they aren’t looking for approval or validation. They have it in themselves. They are looking for association.

But how do we mass produce such agency in women – when doing so in men is rather easy: we fear one another.

Now I know, we know, for certain, that christianity ‘works’ for suppression of feminine neuroticism and hypersubjectivity to attention, validation, and approval.

But only when it is a product of family and social discipline.

However, like any ‘good’ it can be overindulged, overapplied, and lead to the very mental illness it was designed to overcome.

We made the mistake of the naturalistic fallacy that people would behave as did our christian ancestors without the continous reinforcement from family, church, and society. All civilizations make this mistake – we aren’t special. The church taught the most important discipline of all: emotional self regulation, suppression of aggression, and insulation from dominance, status, and virtue signals.

Then we threw these children in vast numbers into the education system which sought to train workers for citizenship, business industry, and government – a political rather than social and moral ambition.

And we abandoned physical fitness, self regulation, maners, ethics, morals, grammar, logic, rhetoric, and the necessity of obedience when in groups of any scale, given the behavior of mobs.

But instead education evolved into an alternate religion without the pretense of superstition, but instead adopted genetic, cultural, and behavioral pseudoscience, and utopian idealism: the result is the “fragile snowflakes”.

In other words, we must invest much more heavily in creating ‘basic human competence’, as did our ancestral religions, and less so in feminine, leftist, irresponsible, political ideology.

Education is costly. But the sh—t education we perform today is far more costly in consequence.

Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute