(from an article on Salon)
(a) White Supremacism – like Jewish supremacism, Russian Supremacism, Muslim Supremacism, Hindu Supremacism, Chinese Supremacism, and Japanese supremacism, is a demonstration of kin selection. However white supremacism is advocated by our intellectual, scientific, technological, normative, social, and political rates achievement in both the ancient and modern worlds, and our lack of similar rapid advancement in the Abrahamic Dark Age.
(b) We have known that man has continuously whitened in the northern climates for years – just as he has continuously darkened in african climes.
(c) We have known for years the process of ‘whitening’ began 20k years ago – and has been reversing since white people internlinked the world through rapid transportation during the age of sail.
(d) We have known for the past few years that the Yamna expansion did not integrate but replaced prior generations of proto europeans with modern european-indo-iranians.
(e) we are discovering through genetic analysis that our superiority is biological: we have succeeded at greater pedomorphic evolution by variation in endocrine expression during in utero, ex utero, and later development, and the lifelong expressions of that pedomorphism – which is why we have lower testosterone, are more tolerant, less clannish, and are the highest trust people on earth, and the only people to develop a high trust, territorial, capital intensive, commons-intensive, civilization. Period.
And all kin groups, whether tribe, nation, or race, seek their superiority as an expression of evolutionary necessity –
without which groups would not identify opportunities to exploit and evolve to seize them.
The Marxist-postmodern pseudo-scientific century is over. Man is no different from any other animal in that breeds express genetic traits. And all we see between abrahamic and western arguments, is the scientific western male evolutionary, and the rhetorical female devolutionary expressions of those genes.
What has happened is that while it has taken seventy years of hard work, despite active suppression of academic research SCIENCE has proven us right, and we are armed with that science. And that is the reason we are winning.
Because western man originated science, and remains scientific if for no other reason than his origins are technological: expansion through the combination of horse, wheel, bronze, language, and truthful (empirical) testimony.
No More Dark Ages. The First Abrahamic equalitarian counter-enlightenment caused a thousand year dark age and so far 500M lives.
The Second Abrahamic Egalitarian Counter-Enlightenment begins with Rousseau, to Kant and the Continental School, to Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, and the Frankfurt School, and back to the french for the Postmodern and Feminist School – with nothing but Counter-evidence, Counter-history, Counter-Truth, Counter-Reason, and outright propagandism and lying.
We will succeed at defeating the Second Abrahamic Dark Age, in its marxist-communist pseudoscientific, postmodern-equalitarian pseudo-rational, and Islamic theological (magical) school.
We will do so by demonstrating our SUPERIORITY in Truth, Reason, Science, Technology, Law, Institutions, Norms, and traditions. Because in the end our tradition is truth and correspondence with reality – and that, and our genes, are our competitive advantage. An advantage unequalled among the tribes, nations, and races.
Curt Doolittle,
The Propertarian Institute,
Kiev Ukraine
Theme: Cooperation
-
Every Kin Group’s Conservatives(Males) Advocate Supremacism
(from an article on Salon) (a) White Supremacism – like Jewish supremacism, Russian Supremacism, Muslim Supremacism, Hindu Supremacism, Chinese Supremacism, and Japanese supremacism, is a demonstration of kin selection. However white supremacism is advocated by our intellectual, scientific, technological, normative, social, and political rates achievement in both the ancient and modern worlds, and our lack of similar rapid advancement in the Abrahamic Dark Age. (b) We have known that man has continuously whitened in the northern climates for years – just as he has continuously darkened in african climes. (c) We have known for years the process of ‘whitening’ began 20k years ago – and has been reversing since white people internlinked the world through rapid transportation during the age of sail. (d) We have known for the past few years that the Yamna expansion did not integrate but replaced prior generations of proto europeans with modern european-indo-iranians. (e) we are discovering through genetic analysis that our superiority is biological: we have succeeded at greater pedomorphic evolution by variation in endocrine expression during in utero, ex utero, and later development, and the lifelong expressions of that pedomorphism – which is why we have lower testosterone, are more tolerant, less clannish, and are the highest trust people on earth, and the only people to develop a high trust, territorial, capital intensive, commons-intensive, civilization. Period. And all kin groups, whether tribe, nation, or race, seek their superiority as an expression of evolutionary necessity – without which groups would not identify opportunities to exploit and evolve to seize them. The Marxist-postmodern pseudo-scientific century is over. Man is no different from any other animal in that breeds express genetic traits. And all we see between abrahamic and western arguments, is the scientific western male evolutionary, and the rhetorical female devolutionary expressions of those genes. What has happened is that while it has taken seventy years of hard work, despite active suppression of academic research SCIENCE has proven us right, and we are armed with that science. And that is the reason we are winning. Because western man originated science, and remains scientific if for no other reason than his origins are technological: expansion through the combination of horse, wheel, bronze, language, and truthful (empirical) testimony. No More Dark Ages. The First Abrahamic equalitarian counter-enlightenment caused a thousand year dark age and so far 500M lives. The Second Abrahamic Egalitarian Counter-Enlightenment begins with Rousseau, to Kant and the Continental School, to Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, and the Frankfurt School, and back to the french for the Postmodern and Feminist School – with nothing but Counter-evidence, Counter-history, Counter-Truth, Counter-Reason, and outright propagandism and lying. We will succeed at defeating the Second Abrahamic Dark Age, in its marxist-communist pseudoscientific, postmodern-equalitarian pseudo-rational, and Islamic theological (magical) school. We will do so by demonstrating our SUPERIORITY in Truth, Reason, Science, Technology, Law, Institutions, Norms, and traditions. Because in the end our tradition is truth and correspondence with reality – and that, and our genes, are our competitive advantage. An advantage unequalled among the tribes, nations, and races. Curt Doolittle, The Propertarian Institute, Kiev Ukraine -
My answer to Does libertarianism require a higher than average level of social c
My answer to Does libertarianism require a higher than average level of social capital in order to work on a large … https://www.quora.com/Does-libertarianism-require-a-higher-than-average-level-of-social-capital-in-order-to-work-on-a-large-scale/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-07 01:39:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/961051659592806400
-
Does Libertarianism Require A Higher Than Average Level Of Social Capital In Order To Work On A Large Scale?
Social Capital, like ‘social justice’ is a notoriously suspect term. But I’m going to assume you mean:
1 – Language, Manners, Ethics, Morals (intergenerational norms),
And that in addition you MAY be referring to:
2- Traditions, laws, myths, histories, sciences (intergenerational decidability), and informal and formal institutions (intergenerational institutions).
And that you are NOT referring to:
3 – genetic advantage either (a) universally such as jewish and western verbal ability or east asian short term memory ability, or (b) a beneficial distribution (near extermination of the underclasses in Western, Ashkenazi, Han/Korean/Japanese populations, producing a higher mean distribution)
As far as I know the independent polity must raise its median IQ over 105, and as close to 115 as possible in order to make a libertarian polity possible if for no other reason than the institutions and methods of decidability that are possible for such people without the high cost of the underclasses.
Or stated another way, a population with a median IQ above 112–115 would find other than ‘libertarian’ laws unnecessary, where those below 100 increasingly find authority and fixed rules necessary.
So I would say that any population desirous of Freedom(managed), Liberty (by permission), and sovereignty(in fact), would be much more dependent upon genetic capital than normative capital.
The simple reason being that one can adopt behaviors by simply imposing laws to prohibit undesirable alternatives – as we largely do today. But that no imposition of law upon insufficient genetic capital will allow high trust norms and traditions to form.
Western man must abandon the fallacies of christianity. We excelled because we eliminated our underclasses through manorialism, aggressive prosecution, disease and war. Our civilization is entirely eugenic, using ‘markets in everything’ from family, to production, to commons, to polities. And we succeeded by profiting from the domestication (eugenic) of man. And that we have reversed that trend over the past century and a half – and we are currently paying the costs of it. And immigration has made it far worse.
What is the cost of 1pt of IQ? It is the highest cost commons that man can produce, and the most beneficial.
Curt Doolittle
the Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukrainehttps://www.quora.com/Does-libertarianism-require-a-higher-than-average-level-of-social-capital-in-order-to-work-on-a-large-scale
-
Does Libertarianism Require A Higher Than Average Level Of Social Capital In Order To Work On A Large Scale?
Social Capital, like ‘social justice’ is a notoriously suspect term. But I’m going to assume you mean:
1 – Language, Manners, Ethics, Morals (intergenerational norms),
And that in addition you MAY be referring to:
2- Traditions, laws, myths, histories, sciences (intergenerational decidability), and informal and formal institutions (intergenerational institutions).
And that you are NOT referring to:
3 – genetic advantage either (a) universally such as jewish and western verbal ability or east asian short term memory ability, or (b) a beneficial distribution (near extermination of the underclasses in Western, Ashkenazi, Han/Korean/Japanese populations, producing a higher mean distribution)
As far as I know the independent polity must raise its median IQ over 105, and as close to 115 as possible in order to make a libertarian polity possible if for no other reason than the institutions and methods of decidability that are possible for such people without the high cost of the underclasses.
Or stated another way, a population with a median IQ above 112–115 would find other than ‘libertarian’ laws unnecessary, where those below 100 increasingly find authority and fixed rules necessary.
So I would say that any population desirous of Freedom(managed), Liberty (by permission), and sovereignty(in fact), would be much more dependent upon genetic capital than normative capital.
The simple reason being that one can adopt behaviors by simply imposing laws to prohibit undesirable alternatives – as we largely do today. But that no imposition of law upon insufficient genetic capital will allow high trust norms and traditions to form.
Western man must abandon the fallacies of christianity. We excelled because we eliminated our underclasses through manorialism, aggressive prosecution, disease and war. Our civilization is entirely eugenic, using ‘markets in everything’ from family, to production, to commons, to polities. And we succeeded by profiting from the domestication (eugenic) of man. And that we have reversed that trend over the past century and a half – and we are currently paying the costs of it. And immigration has made it far worse.
What is the cost of 1pt of IQ? It is the highest cost commons that man can produce, and the most beneficial.
Curt Doolittle
the Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukrainehttps://www.quora.com/Does-libertarianism-require-a-higher-than-average-level-of-social-capital-in-order-to-work-on-a-large-scale
-
The Humility And Wisdom Of Conservatives
Conservative just aren’t arrogant. We rely on the empirical result of markets of voluntary cooperation at every scale from the personal mind, to the interpersonal relation, to the the reproductive and familial, to the civic, to the national, to the international, to the civilizational, to the Racial, to the evolution of mankind – as living, working, and reproducing in concert with the universe such that man can become the gods he imagines. The operational name of conservatism is Aristocracy, and the means of decision by Aristocracy is Empiricism, and empiricism means nothing other than ‘surviving competition in all markets, whether evolutionary, physical, logical, rational, or preferential. Priests, Public Intellectuals, Academics, Socialists, and women can afford to be idalists because they do not warranty the outcomes of their actions, and seek profit on snake oil future that they do not warranty. Kings, Warriors, Entrepreneurs, Engineers, and men, cannot afford to be idealists, because they explicitly and implicitly warranty their actions. If we required people warranty their display, speech, and deeds as we did prior to the marxist/postmodernists, then we would not have experienced the dysgenia and collapse of western civilization by the second abrahamic counter-revolution. The last time by the (((lies))) of supernaturalism, and this time by the (((lies))) of pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism. They destroyed the aristocratic roman empire by not suppressing the lies of abrahamism version one: judaism, christianity, and islam) And letting spread dysgenia and ignorance at massive scales. They are destroying the aristocratic western empire once again, by abrahamism version two: pseudoscience, pseudo rationalism, and dysgenic reproduction and immigration. Truth, Wealth, Evolution, and Eugenics, or (((Lies))), Poverty, Devolution, and Dysgenia. We cannot let (((them))) bring about the Third Dark Age of Man, by yet another counter-enligthenment, and counter-revolution, against aristocracy, truth, science, and reason, by the creation of monopolies. Monopoly government. Monopoly genetics. Monopoly thought. Let a thousand nations bloom. And kill every soul that resists their blossoming. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine. -
The Humility And Wisdom Of Conservatives
Conservative just aren’t arrogant. We rely on the empirical result of markets of voluntary cooperation at every scale from the personal mind, to the interpersonal relation, to the the reproductive and familial, to the civic, to the national, to the international, to the civilizational, to the Racial, to the evolution of mankind – as living, working, and reproducing in concert with the universe such that man can become the gods he imagines. The operational name of conservatism is Aristocracy, and the means of decision by Aristocracy is Empiricism, and empiricism means nothing other than ‘surviving competition in all markets, whether evolutionary, physical, logical, rational, or preferential. Priests, Public Intellectuals, Academics, Socialists, and women can afford to be idalists because they do not warranty the outcomes of their actions, and seek profit on snake oil future that they do not warranty. Kings, Warriors, Entrepreneurs, Engineers, and men, cannot afford to be idealists, because they explicitly and implicitly warranty their actions. If we required people warranty their display, speech, and deeds as we did prior to the marxist/postmodernists, then we would not have experienced the dysgenia and collapse of western civilization by the second abrahamic counter-revolution. The last time by the (((lies))) of supernaturalism, and this time by the (((lies))) of pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism. They destroyed the aristocratic roman empire by not suppressing the lies of abrahamism version one: judaism, christianity, and islam) And letting spread dysgenia and ignorance at massive scales. They are destroying the aristocratic western empire once again, by abrahamism version two: pseudoscience, pseudo rationalism, and dysgenic reproduction and immigration. Truth, Wealth, Evolution, and Eugenics, or (((Lies))), Poverty, Devolution, and Dysgenia. We cannot let (((them))) bring about the Third Dark Age of Man, by yet another counter-enligthenment, and counter-revolution, against aristocracy, truth, science, and reason, by the creation of monopolies. Monopoly government. Monopoly genetics. Monopoly thought. Let a thousand nations bloom. And kill every soul that resists their blossoming. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine. -
THE HUMILITY AND WISDOM OF CONSERVATIVES Conservative just aren’t arrogant. We r
THE HUMILITY AND WISDOM OF CONSERVATIVES
Conservative just aren’t arrogant. We rely on the empirical result of markets of voluntary cooperation at every scale from the personal mind, to the interpersonal relation, to the the reproductive and familial, to the civic, to the national, to the international, to the civilizational, to the Racial, to the evolution of mankind – as living, working, and reproducing in concert with the universe such that man can become the gods he imagines.
The operational name of conservatism is Aristocracy, and the means of decision by Aristocracy is Empiricism, and empiricism means nothing other than ‘surviving competition in all markets, whether evolutionary, physical, logical, rational, or preferential.
Priests, Public Intellectuals, Academics, Socialists, and women can afford to be idalists because they do not warranty the outcomes of their actions, and seek profit on snake oil future that they do not warranty.
Kings, Warriors, Entrepreneurs, Engineers, and men, cannot afford to be idealists, because they explicitly and implicitly warranty their actions.
If we required people warranty their display, speech, and deeds as we did prior to the marxist/postmodernists, then we would not have experienced the dysgenia and collapse of western civilization by the second abrahamic counter-revolution. The last time by the (((lies))) of supernaturalism, and this time by the (((lies))) of pseudoscience and pseudo-rationalism.
They destroyed the aristocratic roman empire by not suppressing the lies of abrahamism version one: judaism, christianity, and islam) And letting spread dysgenia and ignorance at massive scales.
They are destroying the aristocratic western empire once again, by abrahamism version two: pseudoscience, pseudo rationalism, and dysgenic reproduction and immigration.
Truth, Wealth, Evolution, and Eugenics, or (((Lies))), Poverty, Devolution, and Dysgenia.
We cannot let (((them))) bring about the Third Dark Age of Man, by yet another counter-enligthenment, and counter-revolution, against aristocracy, truth, science, and reason, by the creation of monopolies.
Monopoly government.
Monopoly genetics.
Monopoly thought.
Let a thousand nations bloom.
And kill every soul that resists their blossoming.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2018-02-04 12:58:00 UTC
-
What Are Some Unwritten Moral Laws?
There exists only one universal moral law of sentient beings: Reciprocity. And it has been written since the dawn of writing in both via-positiva form as the golden rule, and in via-negativa form as the silver rule.
Via-Negativa: Do not unto others what you would not have them do unto you.
Via-Positiva: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.The one law of Reciprocity that we call Natural Law, is this:
“The only moral actions are those that consist exclusively of productive, fully informed, warranteed, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality.”
So all displays, words, and deeds that are not immoral, are either amoral (not immoral) or moral (productive).
But We Are Frequently Immoral
Unfortunately, while the via-negativa version is more accurate and less open to misinterpretation, the via-positiva is more popular for the simple reason that it is more open to intentional misinterpretation – as a POSITIVE demand for behavior rather than a NEGATIVE demand that we eschew behavior.And men and women are natural deceivers in pursuit of discounts on their acquisitions. So we see people claim that it is moral to impose costs upon others. We see this false claim in (a) demand for sacrifice rather than limiting demand to non-imposition upon others. (b) demand for positive freedoms that impose costs upon others, rather than negative freedoms that prevent us from imposing costs upon others. (c) demand for ‘human rights’ the last few of which impose costs upon others, rather than Natural Rights, which demand we impose no costs upon others.
And via negativa prohibition on imposition of costs, is something all can do, while demand for the imposition of costs upon others is not something we can all do, nor can we pay such demands, nor is it clear that by paying such demand we do other than increase the immorality of such demands.
So the one universal moral law of sentient beings is the via negativa form of do not unto others as you would not have them do unto you, and the via positiva form is open to use by fraudulent pretense.
The Seen and Unseen
Now, enter the seen and unseen: It turns out that the optimum group strategy for any and every polity, is to exhaust opportunity for cooperation as a cost of converting immoral people into moral people – but only on an interpersonal, not political basis. So if we use government charity or professional charities we simply increase immoral behavior in the government, in the charity, and in the polity – because subsidy of immorality always serves to increase immorality (the chief means of immorality is reproduction of children one cannot afford, and entrapping others in the moral hazard of supporting your children, rather than additional children of their own.)Christian Forgiveness and The Natural Law of Torts
This is the economic strategy of via-positiva Christian forgiveness, and via-negativa of Aristocratic (Militia) Law of Tort. The vast crimes of the three Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and especially Islam) in creating the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of the great ancient civilizations, aside, the economic reality is that interpersonal responsibility for the conversion of others from immoral to moral actors, and resorting to legal (communal) prosecution when it fails, is the reason for Christianity’s spread of wealth wherever it goes.While western man evolved individual Sovereignty, the Jury, Thang, and Senate, the independent Empirical Judiciary, the independent common law of torts, using the natural law of reciprocity, that strategy is maximized, by the same personal responsibility for one’s behavior, the domestication of one’s children, domesticating the underclasses, and domesticating the foreigners lacking long traditions in individual Sovereignty, Individual responsibility, Natural Law by Exhaustive Forgiveness but not exhaustive tolerance. And then resorting to the commons to punish those who cannot adapt to that moral standard.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-unwritten-moral-laws
-
What Are Some Unwritten Moral Laws?
There exists only one universal moral law of sentient beings: Reciprocity. And it has been written since the dawn of writing in both via-positiva form as the golden rule, and in via-negativa form as the silver rule.
Via-Negativa: Do not unto others what you would not have them do unto you.
Via-Positiva: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.The one law of Reciprocity that we call Natural Law, is this:
“The only moral actions are those that consist exclusively of productive, fully informed, warranteed, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs upon the investments of others by externality.”
So all displays, words, and deeds that are not immoral, are either amoral (not immoral) or moral (productive).
But We Are Frequently Immoral
Unfortunately, while the via-negativa version is more accurate and less open to misinterpretation, the via-positiva is more popular for the simple reason that it is more open to intentional misinterpretation – as a POSITIVE demand for behavior rather than a NEGATIVE demand that we eschew behavior.And men and women are natural deceivers in pursuit of discounts on their acquisitions. So we see people claim that it is moral to impose costs upon others. We see this false claim in (a) demand for sacrifice rather than limiting demand to non-imposition upon others. (b) demand for positive freedoms that impose costs upon others, rather than negative freedoms that prevent us from imposing costs upon others. (c) demand for ‘human rights’ the last few of which impose costs upon others, rather than Natural Rights, which demand we impose no costs upon others.
And via negativa prohibition on imposition of costs, is something all can do, while demand for the imposition of costs upon others is not something we can all do, nor can we pay such demands, nor is it clear that by paying such demand we do other than increase the immorality of such demands.
So the one universal moral law of sentient beings is the via negativa form of do not unto others as you would not have them do unto you, and the via positiva form is open to use by fraudulent pretense.
The Seen and Unseen
Now, enter the seen and unseen: It turns out that the optimum group strategy for any and every polity, is to exhaust opportunity for cooperation as a cost of converting immoral people into moral people – but only on an interpersonal, not political basis. So if we use government charity or professional charities we simply increase immoral behavior in the government, in the charity, and in the polity – because subsidy of immorality always serves to increase immorality (the chief means of immorality is reproduction of children one cannot afford, and entrapping others in the moral hazard of supporting your children, rather than additional children of their own.)Christian Forgiveness and The Natural Law of Torts
This is the economic strategy of via-positiva Christian forgiveness, and via-negativa of Aristocratic (Militia) Law of Tort. The vast crimes of the three Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, and especially Islam) in creating the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of the great ancient civilizations, aside, the economic reality is that interpersonal responsibility for the conversion of others from immoral to moral actors, and resorting to legal (communal) prosecution when it fails, is the reason for Christianity’s spread of wealth wherever it goes.While western man evolved individual Sovereignty, the Jury, Thang, and Senate, the independent Empirical Judiciary, the independent common law of torts, using the natural law of reciprocity, that strategy is maximized, by the same personal responsibility for one’s behavior, the domestication of one’s children, domesticating the underclasses, and domesticating the foreigners lacking long traditions in individual Sovereignty, Individual responsibility, Natural Law by Exhaustive Forgiveness but not exhaustive tolerance. And then resorting to the commons to punish those who cannot adapt to that moral standard.
https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-unwritten-moral-laws