—“Culture: Market (city), and life surrounding the marketplace (city): The Signals and Rules of conflict avoidance, cooperation, exchange, and the celebration and entertainment we engage in between the chores of participating in that market.”—Igor Rogov
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-02 09:01:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WE CAN AFFORD TO SPECIATE – SO LET’S DO IT
The problem is we are now speciating because we can afford to speciate, because we can afford to SORT, and through mobility and sortition specialize.
This is a good thing as long as we create governments for each group that is speciating, becasue governments create the commons necessary to support the interests of those who are speciating.
The problem is the fallacy of “WE”. There is no longer a ‘WE’, becuase we are not enough the same as we were until 1960 when the left decided to achieve through third world immigration what they could not achieve by their ideas.
A libertarian does not want to govern others. He or she only wants to remain ungoverned by others. However, we differ in the commons we demand. And as such we differ in the polities we must produce.
SO the only solution is Revolution, Secession, Sortition, Prosperity, and Speciation.
You see, it’s pretty obvious given the genetic record that we were in the process of speciating by region. Farming changed that. At present, farming is over, and speciation can continue becasue we can afford to this time, not because it was necessary as in prior eras.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 15:28:23 UTC
Men divide cognitive labor more so than women. We have many tribes. Each tribe specializes in the conceptual tools that they best understand. This specialization as in all things reflects the class structure. That is what men have been doing for the past ten years: building tools. Not one – but many. Each ‘faction’ of the New (Scientific) Right is developing the tools that they know how to use. And when we are ready we will form an army with very special tools, for each tribe, and because of that variety of weapons we will win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-30 11:26:00 UTC
There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question. Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question. The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.
There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question. Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question. The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
THERE IS NO “WE”
There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question.
Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question.
The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 20:50:49 UTC
THERE IS NO “WE”
There is no “WE”. There is us and ours, and you and yours, and they and theirs, and cooperation with you or they, under your or their parasitism, is no longer preferable to separation, war, or even extermination. It is a purely empirical question.
Cooperation is only valuable until it is not. Under certain conditions cooperation is profitable – when it is not parasitic. Under other conditions predation is preferable to parasitism. The only question I have is whether separation, enslavement, or destruction is preferable. That is a purely empirical question.
The subject of morality is a condition of cooperation outside of cooperation all questions are amoral. Under parasitism only predation is rational. It is a purely empirical question.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 16:50:00 UTC
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
Jan 30, 2017 10:32pm
NATURAL LAW OF SOVEREIGN MEN: DOMESTICATING ANIMAL MAN FOR PEERS AND PROFIT.
An animal has no agency, only impulse; can enter no contracts, only seize conveniences; can resolve no disputes truthfully, only imagine excuses. It cannot be reasoned with, only bribed or punished. But with bribes and punishments it can be trained. And if training fails, abandoned to the wild, enslaved, imprisoned, or killed.
We train the animal with property in toto, manners, ethics, morals, and law. We use peers, parents, teachers, sheriffs, police, judges, juries, soldiers, generals and kings.
The animal can be trained from beast to slave, to serf, to dependent, to freeman, to civilian, to soldier, to aristocracy: human.
The training requires sentience, awareness, consciousness, reason, knowledge, and agency.
But each degree of training demands more of the animal, and many – most – cannot complete it, and transcend the animal.
As such the world is full of a few humans and many domesticated animals of varying degree, and many, many beasts.
Thankfully, like many domesticatable animals, these animals, once domesticated, can often be put to good use.
And as such, the beast man, like all other domesticatable beasts, can be domesticated for profit.
The domestication of man – that occupation we call rule – is the most profitable occupation of all, except for one:
The success in breeding, and training humans.
Because while animals are a commodity, producing the rare human is the most profitable industry of all.
And if it fails, hunting the beast man that remain, is the greatest joy of all.
The Philosophy of Aristocracy
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 14:21:24 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/REMEMBER WHEN YOU TOLD ME IT COULN’T HAPPEN?
VIA RASUMSSEN
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
“That which appears inconceivable is merely a function of the determinacy of human behavior and the ignorance of the incentives”
—“Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters say it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years, with 11% who say it’s Very Likely. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59% consider a second civil war unlikely, but that includes only 29% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Democrats (37%) are more fearful than Republicans (32%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (26%) that a second civil war is at hand.
But 59% of all voters are concerned that those opposed to President Trump’s policies will resort to violence, with 33% who are Very Concerned. This compares to 53% and 28% respectively in the spring of Obama’s second year in office. Thirty-seven percent (37%) don’t share that concern, including 16% who are Not At All Concerned.
Fifty-three percent (53%) are concerned that those critical of the media’s coverage of Trump will resort to violence, with 24% who are Very Concerned. Forty-two percent (42%) are not concerned about violence from media opponents, including 17% who are Not At All Concerned.”—
“REVOLUTION IS ALWAYS SUSPECT IN PROSPECT BUT DETERMINISTIC IN RETROSPECT”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 11:46:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/REMEMBER WHEN YOU TOLD ME IT COULN’T HAPPEN?
VIA RASUMSSEN
Wednesday, June 27, 2018
“That which appears inconceivable is merely a function of the determinacy of human behavior and the ignorance of the incentives”
—“Thirty-one percent (31%) of Likely U.S. Voters say it’s likely that the United States will experience a second civil war sometime in the next five years, with 11% who say it’s Very Likely. A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 59% consider a second civil war unlikely, but that includes only 29% who say it’s Not At All Likely. (To see survey question wording, click here.)
Democrats (37%) are more fearful than Republicans (32%) and voters not affiliated with either major party (26%) that a second civil war is at hand.
But 59% of all voters are concerned that those opposed to President Trump’s policies will resort to violence, with 33% who are Very Concerned. This compares to 53% and 28% respectively in the spring of Obama’s second year in office. Thirty-seven percent (37%) don’t share that concern, including 16% who are Not At All Concerned.
Fifty-three percent (53%) are concerned that those critical of the media’s coverage of Trump will resort to violence, with 24% who are Very Concerned. Forty-two percent (42%) are not concerned about violence from media opponents, including 17% who are Not At All Concerned.”—
“REVOLUTION IS ALWAYS SUSPECT IN PROSPECT BUT DETERMINISTIC IN RETROSPECT”
https://propertarianism.com/2017/11/01/cooperation-is-only-useful-until-it-is-not/
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-27 11:46:00 UTC