Theme: Cooperation

  • The Male Disincentive for Social Preservation

    by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different Now.” Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t. “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence. Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence. Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages. Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age. Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity. To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution. Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes. Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely. The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape. Now they are tax slaves. What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.

  • Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation

    Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 19:53:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1021483435741863937

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooper

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 19:53:10 UTC

  • Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation

    Diversity? Never confuse vacation, and cooperation, with cohabitation.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-23 15:53:00 UTC

  • The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t.

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

  • The Herd All Speaks the Same Language. the Packs Don’t.

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack. Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary. And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass. And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism. So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight. So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all. The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-22 19:04:47 UTC

  • The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The

    The more left(feminine) we intuit the more we seek conformity with the herd. The more right (masculine) we intuit, the more we seek allies in a pack.

    Furthermore we choose our pack leaders, and we choose our packs, and our pack propaganda (signaling) and strategy (directness) by what we perceive as actionable and voluntary.

    And as such we form packs by class, and by class within age groups although they appear to be only younger(direct and tactical) and older(indirect and strategic) – as our energies (direct) and experience (indirect) warrant

    But whereas the left can be opportunistic, and the herd will follow opportunities. The right can be opportunistic, but will seize fewer opportunities, requiring more momentum and urgency for critical mass.

    And whereas the left herd follows opportunities they are opportunities against the right. Whereas the right packs seek only those opportunities to resist the left’s parasitism.

    So this is why I am still struggling with the Natsoc, WN, working classes – and for no reason. They need an opportunity to obtain what they want. But they can do nothing other than fight.

    So we are in a much harder position than the left. We are operating from a position of defense, and we have a harder time pulling together enough allies on critical mass, unless there is an event that provides possible movement for all.

    The herd all speaks the same language. The packs don’t.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-22 15:04:00 UTC

  • Groups Differ in The Degree of Suppression of Externalization of Costs

    —“Why should I be barred from contributing to the growth of another who would in turn contribute to my own growth?”— Bennard Ebanks When doing so imposes costs upon others by externality, who tolerate your presence only under the condition that you do not do so. Groups differ in the degree of suppression of externalization of costs. High trust high performance, homogenous polities are intolerant – and because they are, they have the choice. Low trust, heterogeneous, low performing are tolerant. Because they have no other choice.

  • Groups Differ in The Degree of Suppression of Externalization of Costs

    —“Why should I be barred from contributing to the growth of another who would in turn contribute to my own growth?”— Bennard Ebanks When doing so imposes costs upon others by externality, who tolerate your presence only under the condition that you do not do so. Groups differ in the degree of suppression of externalization of costs. High trust high performance, homogenous polities are intolerant – and because they are, they have the choice. Low trust, heterogeneous, low performing are tolerant. Because they have no other choice.