Theme: Cooperation

  • THE RISK OF UNLIMITED SELF-ADAPTATION OF WOMEN The degree with which women will

    THE RISK OF UNLIMITED SELF-ADAPTATION OF WOMEN

    The degree with which women will self modify to maintain the peace is often detrimental to the women, the men, and the peace.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 01:02:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1022285913030832133

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. THE RISK OF UNLIMITED SELF-ADAPTATION OF WOME

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    THE RISK OF UNLIMITED SELF-ADAPTATION OF WOMEN

    The degree with which women will self modify to maintain the peace is often detrimental to the women, the men, and the peace.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-26 01:01:49 UTC

  • THE RISK OF UNLIMITED SELF-ADAPTATION OF WOMEN The degree with which women will

    THE RISK OF UNLIMITED SELF-ADAPTATION OF WOMEN

    The degree with which women will self modify to maintain the peace is often detrimental to the women, the men, and the peace.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 21:01:00 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. SEPARATE: THERE IS ISN’T ANY ‘US’ ANY LONGER

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    SEPARATE: THERE IS ISN’T ANY ‘US’ ANY LONGER

    There is no “us”, because we demonstrate want and need for different commons. A government provides no other function than the production of commons. A democracy constitutes a monopoly on the production of commons. Ergo, the only possible solution to a demand for different commons is separation.

    Revote, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Democracy is a means of selecting priorities in the production of commons between those of common interests, wants, and needs.

    A market is a means of selecting preferences in the production of the private and common among those with different interests wants and needs.

    A market for physical, normative, and institutional commons requires separate governments, where differences between groups are ameliorated by trade policy.

    Democracy over a heterogenous population is just monopoly tyranny.

    We can once again afford to separate, and speciate. And democracy is merely a false religion that prohibits our individual and group fulfillment.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 16:27:06 UTC

  • Secession Lets Us Exit Our In-Group Leftists (traitors)

    There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well. Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups. When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.

  • Secession Lets Us Exit Our In-Group Leftists (traitors)

    There are plenty of traitors among us. Secession allows us to separate from in-group opponents and out-group opponents as well. Think of it this way: we can spend time, effort, and resources, to regulate, and another thousand years trying to breed out their behavior – or we can simply leave them behind and let them outbreed and be lost among the out-groups. When you make our struggle against colors alone you miss the opportunity that men of all other colors have the same problem we do: eliminating parasites.

  • SEPARATE: THERE IS ISN’T ANY ‘US’ ANY LONGER There is no “us”, because we demons

    SEPARATE: THERE IS ISN’T ANY ‘US’ ANY LONGER

    There is no “us”, because we demonstrate want and need for different commons. A government provides no other function than the production of commons. A democracy constitutes a monopoly on the production of commons. Ergo, the only possible solution to a demand for different commons is separation.

    Revote, Separate, Prosper, Speciate.

    Democracy is a means of selecting priorities in the production of commons between those of common interests, wants, and needs.

    A market is a means of selecting preferences in the production of the private and common among those with different interests wants and needs.

    A market for physical, normative, and institutional commons requires separate governments, where differences between groups are ameliorated by trade policy.

    Democracy over a heterogenous population is just monopoly tyranny.

    We can once again afford to separate, and speciate. And democracy is merely a false religion that prohibits our individual and group fulfillment.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-25 12:27:00 UTC

  • Capitalism vs Socialism and Public Private Partnership

    Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection. Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption). State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons. At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships. The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.

  • Capitalism vs Socialism and Public Private Partnership

    Capitalism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than parasites without producing commons open to free riding or defection. The question is only the method for producing those commons while suppressing free riding and defection. Communism is impossible since no group can survive competition with other groups as other than predators and parasites, by producing commons to the exclusion of private property, because all are incentivized only to free ride (do as little as possible) and defect (engage in black markets and corruption). State (corporation) private (shareholder) partnerships have the best record in history, when the state provides roles of insurer and banker in exchange for returns to the commons. At present the only reason the USA is not competing successfully in the world market is a failure to produce public-private partnerships. The reason we cannot do so is because the left can seek rents on these public private partnerships both politically, economically, and socially by the use of syndicalism (unions etc). Unions are only necessary because the courts do not provide universal standing in matters of the commons – ever since the british began violating the ancestral common law of reciprocity and universal standing.

  • The Male Disincentive for Social Preservation

    by Lance Bean “It’s ALL Different Now.” Relationship dynamics have completely changed. But without a MARKETING CAMPAIGN, repeatedly smashing it into people’s men’s faces, NOBODY is “getting it”. And as a consequence we see a anxious, spooked, flocking of everyone’s frames creating a chaos of confusion as we seek a restoration, when the problem is that we can’t. “IT’S ALL DIFFERENT NOW”: Men and women NEED each other less with every passing moment. That fact changes the family dynamic. Technology has freed us from interdependence. Marriage WAS the alternative to prostitution. Now prostitution is criminal and marriage is passé. It used to be both genders marry young and have several kids to work the farm. Families were an asset that provided lifetime discounts and insurance, allowed for the accumulation of capital, prevented parasitism on the property and efforts of others, and prevented male on male violence. Now, it’s extremely smart for the youngest women to have a single child by several different men of high income with established careers – preferably in marriages. Her incentives are to increase her income by being a baby maker but siphoning off of men – who lose marketability to other women, lose the ability to accumulate resources, and are doomed to poverty in old age. Under those conditions, men have become indentured slaves until the child is a mid 20’s adult – and wards of the state in old age. Children in the past were considered adults at 14 or 15 and they had to work and some married. Today they infantilized by a female dominated educational system, the aggressive suppression of masculinity and male dominance play that is necessary for men to invest in family, society, and polity. To pretend that the natural order is a traditional conservative nuclear family is ridiculous: the natural order is prostitution. Prostitution was accepted as legitimate for thousands of years. ALL women were prostitutes. Men only “married” or sometimes took care of the women that had a kid by him through rape most likely. The men could organize, hunt, kill and rape. Now they are tax slaves. What does this mean? It is no longer in men’s incentive to preserve a government and social order that reduces them to serfdom, isolation, old age loneliness, and poverty.