Theme: Cooperation

  • Current postmodern vernacular interprets “conquer” as “ownership” rather than wi

    Current postmodern vernacular interprets “conquer” as “ownership” rather than winning her over by fighting through the fortress of her ‘tests of reliability’. (Something the current slang supplies a less tasteful synonym for.) So, in other words, activists are least educated.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-08 21:51:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027311484802686977

    Reply addressees: @DegenRolf

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027141451589840896


    IN REPLY TO:

    @DegenRolf

    Some commenters took issues with the term “conquer a woman”. It is absolutely standard in German (eine Frau erobern) and, though having had its ups and downs, still widely used in English books. https://t.co/HOxsNhK1fE

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1027141451589840896

  • photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/38679659_270690276861203_65265446126

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/38679659_270690276861203_65265446126

    photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/38679659_270690276861203_6526544612654317568_o_270690273527870.jpg MILITARY SERVICE: INVESTMENT IN THE COMMONS VS PARASITISM UPON IT

    —“The parts of the country that are the most liberal are pulling the least weight with regard to military service. This has exponential effects, in that over time, as liberals do not take part in military service, the military becomes more conservative not through any movivated action of corruption by conservatives, but to liberals as a group electing not to serve, a fact which makes many, many conservatives very bitter to this day.”—

    —“…most of the people in the military still come from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns. This is not to mention a major portion of the military coming from the the South with an awkward silence from wealthy New England states and the Midwest.”—

    As I have said, the difference is largely in the scale of commons that one defends, and that commons is the inverse of population density.

    What this map doesn’t tell you directly, is that the military is predominantly anglo-scotts-irish and that the germans do not serve in proportion to their territorial power. Which is not what you’d expect. But it’s true.

    **Most of the military comes from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns.**

    (The people I feel are underserved, yet most moral of all.)

    This is where one ‘recruits’ the revolution.MILITARY SERVICE: INVESTMENT IN THE COMMONS VS PARASITISM UPON IT

    —“The parts of the country that are the most liberal are pulling the least weight with regard to military service. This has exponential effects, in that over time, as liberals do not take part in military service, the military becomes more conservative not through any movivated action of corruption by conservatives, but to liberals as a group electing not to serve, a fact which makes many, many conservatives very bitter to this day.”—

    —“…most of the people in the military still come from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns. This is not to mention a major portion of the military coming from the the South with an awkward silence from wealthy New England states and the Midwest.”—

    As I have said, the difference is largely in the scale of commons that one defends, and that commons is the inverse of population density.

    What this map doesn’t tell you directly, is that the military is predominantly anglo-scotts-irish and that the germans do not serve in proportion to their territorial power. Which is not what you’d expect. But it’s true.

    **Most of the military comes from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns.**

    (The people I feel are underserved, yet most moral of all.)

    This is where one ‘recruits’ the revolution.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-07 13:56:00 UTC

  • The Final Word on Oaths, Christianity in Particular, and Religion in General

      Rituals that accompany oaths do not require belief in the ritual, only promise to adhere to the oath lest one be punished for violation of that which the community demands is inviolate (sacred) and therefore unforgivable. The Construction of Religion: Myth, Ritual, Oath, Feast (Festival). Political religion (for governing) in addition requires dogma and ‘law’. European pagan religion divided the law (real) from the mythic (ideal), from the cult (supernatural). It was the monotheists who sought a political religion by which to rule others that created a monopoly political dogma, from what had been a market of myths and rituals. ATHEISM The problem with atheism is that while there are dedicated atheists – often people of questionable character, some of us are atheists in that we practice Christanity as a wisdom literature, and many are agnostics in that they go along without knowing one way or the other, and the vast majority only deists who go along because they believe it’s a familial good, – all of us would still (and do) claim we are Christians. And it is why Evangelicals have used that term to distinguish themselves from the rest of us: they practice faith not reason. All that is required to claim one is a Christian is to have adopted the teachings of Christianity: 1. A Respect for private property and that no law may precede private property (the ten commandments) because private property creates harmony. 2. The eradication of hatred from the human heart. 3. The extension of kinship love to non-kin. 4. The extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war, 5. The commitment to personal acts of charity for those who are in need. Now, ‘believers’ seem to think that the dogma has some basis in reality, but this is simply untrue (unscientific). The purpose of the dogma was to train illiterate unskilled slaves, peasants, and subsistence farmers in those four principles. The reason for the success of this dogma is that it creates an addiction response in believers for reasons we understand very clearly now. However, many of us do not need cerebral chemistry addiction to follow those five rules. And we understand the value of ritual (the combination of lesson, oath, feast of the church ritual) regardless of how greatly its demand for obedience differs from the five principles of Christianity. Western civilization has always been poly disciplinary and polytheistic. Those of us from germanic northern European families were just as familiar with the pagan myths and fairy tales, if not far more so than those of the ‘alien’ semitic religion. The Germanicization of Christianity was nearly immediate, and the origins in judaism, and non-european Byzantium was quickly and forcibly adapted to european (germanic and latin ) civilization, just as was the orthodox in the slavic lands. Today a person of minimal learning can undrestand quite easily that community rituals and oaths and feasts are necessary for the construction of civic trust. That aspirational myths are somewhat necessary for the intergenerational preservation of group evolutionary and competitive strategy through imitation. And that the mythos of western civilization is merely our history from the ancient greco-roman, germanic continental, and Atlantic periods. The reason we can worship our ancestors and use our history as mythos is because we have ancestors and history worth remembering. Those people who need falsehoods and fictions do so because they have either few or no ancestors or achievements worth remembering. A PAGAN I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and; 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and; 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. AN ARYAN I am an Aryan if: 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. A WARRIOR I am a warrior in that: 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. THIS IS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A SON OF ERUOPA Sovereign. A Man Transcendent. When you say we need a ‘complete religion’ we have one. This and the natural law of sovereignty. And the history of the european peoples.

  • “We define ourselves more so by what we are against, less so by what we agree up

    —“We define ourselves more so by what we are against, less so by what we agree upon.”—Liupold Engelwulf

    But to make a new world we need something to advocate for.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 12:26:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025719681418706950

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“We define ourselves more so by what we ar

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“We define ourselves more so by what we are against, less so by what we agree upon.”—Liupold Engelwulf

    But to make a new world we need something to advocate for.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 12:26:33 UTC

  • “We define ourselves more so by what we are against, less so by what we agree up

    —“We define ourselves more so by what we are against, less so by what we agree upon.”—Liupold Engelwulf

    But to make a new world we need something to advocate for.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-04 08:26:00 UTC

  • “Packs require contribution (value); herds merely conformity.”— Brandon Hayes

    —“Packs require contribution (value); herds merely conformity.”— Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 19:22:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1025461809090842624

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“Packs require contribution (value); herds

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    —“Packs require contribution (value); herds merely conformity.”— Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 19:21:53 UTC

  • “Packs require contribution (value); herds merely conformity.”— Brandon Hayes

    —“Packs require contribution (value); herds merely conformity.”— Brandon Hayes


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-03 15:21:00 UTC

  • THE ANSWER: PRICELESS ADVICE TO AMERICAN MEN by Aaron Kahland I have been living

    THE ANSWER: PRICELESS ADVICE TO AMERICAN MEN

    by Aaron Kahland

    I have been living in Germany now for half my life. Men spend time with men, women spend time with women. If a man spends time with women (I have encountered such an example once) the other men think he is odd and want little to do with him. Indeed, the women think he is odd and say so openly. Reinforcement takes place in language – there is no ‘wife’ – you refer to her as ‘my woman’ and women refer to their spouse as ‘my man.’

    Inter-gender social activity takes place when sharing meals or evenings together. If outdoors, men congregate at one end of a table or elsewhere and women at the other.

    What is constantly reinforced is gender difference. Women make jokes about men’s traits and men counter with jokes about women. It is unheard of that a woman would find offense at such joke because doing so would be considered a social faux pas and a denial of reality.

    This is, from my experience, true for the rest of continental Europe (Britain is culturally American in my view). The idea that women and men are the same would be completely alien to the French. Their society is more feminine so gender differences are more pronounced at the feminine end – with women in a constant state of emphasis on the feminine which manifests itself frequently via female elegance. In much of Eastern Europe the manifestation occurs principally at the masculine end – men not making any particular effort to dress well is an outward sign of masculinity. Man’s role is to work, work is physical, dressing well means you’re not working. Women dress well.

    What is also alien to me is this constant whining (I witness online, not in person) by young American males about their women folk. Maybe this is justified. If young women there are behaving like Kardashians etc then I’d be disatisfied also. But whining is the solution to nothing. So here’s my advice –

    1. With few exceptions, don’t spend social time with women. What’s the point of that? Are they your peers? Are you going to learn something from those interactions? Is time spent with them somehow going to improve you? If you’re spending time with women frequently you’re probably weak and looking for some emotional comfort or some such nonsense.

    2. Stop spending time with males who are losers and this goes for family members also. If your father is a loser – and for many this is unfortunately the case – then you assume the role of family Oberhaupt (head of family).

    3. Build things. Build physical things. Build your physique. Build extra-salary/wage income. Build families. Build tribes. This is the most important advice. You do this and I can tell you that women will be attracted to you like a moth to a flame.

    4. If you have children spend time with them? Where? In the forest, hiking, reading to them. Use every experience as a lesson – walk past an interesting building and tell them about the architecture. Walk past a monument and tell them about the history behind it. This same interactivity suggestion goes also – and especially so – for your woman. Developing a critically important relationship with your children is improtant for multiple reasons not least that your woman will see you as irreplaceable.

    5. Read non-fiction – lots of it. This is needed for point 4.

    6. Take offense at NOTHING – no exceptions. Taking offense is for the weak. Women don’t like weakness and real men despise it. The approach to criticism is simple. Do you respect this person? If the answer is no, you laugh it off. If the approach is 2, you think about and, if necessary, ask them for constructive advice on how to improve. Corollary to this point is apologizing. Tend towards apologizing by deed (self-improvement) not word.

    7. If you are a young man and begin to date – take the earliest opportunity to assert the fact that you are masculine and you will not tolerate disapproval or even doubt about this fact. Make it clear that you expect your woman to fully commit to the notion that you will both be adopting different roles. Reinforce this via adopting chivalry. Walk on the road end of a pathway, open doors, reject traditionally women’s work but double up on traditionally men’s work. Be more masculine than her father – which for many women will be their benchmark.

    8. Learn to cook – this is not women’s work until you have a family. Self-reliance is critical. Food, shelter and warmth are your core responsibilities.

    Think about this, do you think your grandfathers, if they were both your age and living today would be competitive males? Do you think you or your friends would stand a chance against them in competing for women? I expect they’d be at the apex of the dating game and laughing about all the pussies they were surrounded with.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-08-02 08:20:00 UTC