photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/38679659_270690276861203_65265446126

photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_dJ9jhts2Ng/38679659_270690276861203_6526544612654317568_o_270690273527870.jpg MILITARY SERVICE: INVESTMENT IN THE COMMONS VS PARASITISM UPON IT

—“The parts of the country that are the most liberal are pulling the least weight with regard to military service. This has exponential effects, in that over time, as liberals do not take part in military service, the military becomes more conservative not through any movivated action of corruption by conservatives, but to liberals as a group electing not to serve, a fact which makes many, many conservatives very bitter to this day.”—

—“…most of the people in the military still come from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns. This is not to mention a major portion of the military coming from the the South with an awkward silence from wealthy New England states and the Midwest.”—

As I have said, the difference is largely in the scale of commons that one defends, and that commons is the inverse of population density.

What this map doesn’t tell you directly, is that the military is predominantly anglo-scotts-irish and that the germans do not serve in proportion to their territorial power. Which is not what you’d expect. But it’s true.

**Most of the military comes from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns.**

(The people I feel are underserved, yet most moral of all.)

This is where one ‘recruits’ the revolution.MILITARY SERVICE: INVESTMENT IN THE COMMONS VS PARASITISM UPON IT

—“The parts of the country that are the most liberal are pulling the least weight with regard to military service. This has exponential effects, in that over time, as liberals do not take part in military service, the military becomes more conservative not through any movivated action of corruption by conservatives, but to liberals as a group electing not to serve, a fact which makes many, many conservatives very bitter to this day.”—

—“…most of the people in the military still come from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns. This is not to mention a major portion of the military coming from the the South with an awkward silence from wealthy New England states and the Midwest.”—

As I have said, the difference is largely in the scale of commons that one defends, and that commons is the inverse of population density.

What this map doesn’t tell you directly, is that the military is predominantly anglo-scotts-irish and that the germans do not serve in proportion to their territorial power. Which is not what you’d expect. But it’s true.

**Most of the military comes from lower middle and working class homes, and primarily from small towns.**

(The people I feel are underserved, yet most moral of all.)

This is where one ‘recruits’ the revolution.