Theme: Cooperation

ON MANNERBUND

I agree with the ‘sentiment’ of the Mannerbund narrative, but I express it as ‘it all begins with the militia’, and the militia functions on the brotherhood of warriors. I disagree with the Social Matters / Mannerbund in that the fact that our civilization begins there, does not mean it is SUFFICIENT to defeat enemies, or that much can be made of that ‘feeling’ alone. What binds people are incentive to bind with one another.

Many of you are seeking the sense of safety and power in the pack and the restoration of our institutions of brotherhood throughout society due to the intentional destruction of them by the deconstructionists in marxism, femininsm, postmodernism, who exploit a ready willingness in our female population to defect by sh-t testing us.

But you are making the mistake of an intuitionistic bias that is VERY RARE, instead of providing MAJOR incentives (military, political, economic, personal wealth, agency, status, and a plan to get there you are searching in the dark for emotional support, rallying without resources to do so.

Those institutions of brotherhood are the last good we will achieve, not the first. They are a premium achieved for having worked to obtain military, political, economic, wealth, status benefits.

Men will REPORT affiliation for sentiments.

Men will DEMONSTRATE conviction for material rewards.

The feeling of safety of the pack comes only from the shared experience of working as a pack to produce an outcome which provides an alternative to the present, yet promises only chaos because of an ABSENCE OF VISION.

I do not operate from your perspective but work backward to achieve that emotion through demonstrated action together by the use of incentives to achieve material success.

The answer to our problem is to provide an actionable plan the end result is mannerbund.

That actionable plan is a means of altering the status quo such that POSSIBLE demands are met.

One does not defeat a fortress by direct attack, but by starving it. One does not threaten potential allies but pays them off. One does not create incentives for defenders of the fortress by promises of suffering, but promising them returns.

Once the fortress is won, the holdouts must be flayed and salted and hung from the walls for their crimes.

All revolutions are suspect in prospect but deterministic in retrospect.

It’s time to win.