October 30th, 2018 11:41 AM HARMONY VIA HIERARCHY OR SOVERIEGNTY [S]orry man. I knew when I wrote it I was being lazy and leaving too much up to the reader, but I was tired…. here: 1) yes asian harmony is a commons paid for by NOT speaking truth regardless of the consequences, in order to preserve the harmony created by the hierarchy, under the presumption of the balance between humans and nature, man and woman, parent and children, rulers and people. 2) european (northern) disharmony (truth) is a commons paid for BY speaking and paying the costs to the dominance hierarchy. Soldiers REPORT to officers. OODA Loops (Maneuver) requires initiative within the limits of contract. Warriors volunteer for war as opportunity (booty). Serfs OBEY rulers. Children OBEY parents. And each maintains the contract for harmony by holding formation so to speak (and asians hold formation almost as well as we do). Sefs are recruited for war out of obligation and are paid. 3) So we produce sovereignty and property and commons, and they produce harmony and property and commons. And we develop faster than they do for that reason. Hence why they have adopted our means of rapid adaptation in POLITICS (law, accounting, industry, science) but not in NORMS (heroism, confrontation, demonstration of fitness by truth to power vs their demonstration of fitness by obedience and conformity).
Theme: Cooperation
-
“We Must Restore Limits to The Taker”
October 30th, 2018 2:13 PM “WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER” by Luke Weinhagen [I]n taking ruthlessness (competition unhindered by forbearance) off the table we have allowed “I kill you and take your stuff” to be replaced with “I outvote you and take your stuff”. It is the same threat of violence underpinning both iterations, but the latter removes the limit of direct risk to the taker. We need to be ruthless enough to restore limits to the taker, no matter how the taker fills in the blank within the statement “I ________ you and take you stuff”. What the parasite fills the blank with (guilt, shame, lies, demographics, etc…), ruthlessness must match. In short – We need to say ‘No” and ruthlessly mean it.
-
“WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER” by Luke Weinhagen In taking ruthlessness (
“WE MUST RESTORE LIMITS TO THE TAKER”
by Luke Weinhagen
In taking ruthlessness (competition unhindered by forbearance) off the table we have allowed “I kill you and take your stuff” to be replaced with “I outvote you and take your stuff”.
It is the same threat of violence underpinning both iterations, but the latter removes the limit of direct risk to the taker.
We need to be ruthless enough to restore limits to the taker, no matter how the taker fills in the blank within the statement “I ________ you and take you stuff”.
What the parasite fills the blank with (guilt, shame, lies, demographics, etc…), ruthlessness must match.
In short – We need to say ‘No” and ruthlessly mean it.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-30 14:13:00 UTC
-
The flow (of reality) is to separate and speciate
October 29th, 2018 9:57 AM SPECIATE by Brandon Hayes
The “go with the flow” leftists/hippies/(peace and love)/”can’t we all get along” types can’t see that the flow (of reality) IS to separate and speciate … ….So we can ALL get along!. They can’t see the flow through the globalist herd. For the first time in history we can choose to NOT shovel against the tide of reality (because we can measure it properly) but still we are encouraging the picking-up of shovels and readying the shit shovellers for deadly work, it’s sad.
-
The flow (of reality) is to separate and speciate
October 29th, 2018 9:57 AM SPECIATE by Brandon Hayes
The “go with the flow” leftists/hippies/(peace and love)/”can’t we all get along” types can’t see that the flow (of reality) IS to separate and speciate … ….So we can ALL get along!. They can’t see the flow through the globalist herd. For the first time in history we can choose to NOT shovel against the tide of reality (because we can measure it properly) but still we are encouraging the picking-up of shovels and readying the shit shovellers for deadly work, it’s sad.
-
Refers to the behavior of animals (zebras being the most common example) hiding
Refers to the behavior of animals (zebras being the most common example) hiding within the herd (chaos).
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 14:18:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056913226049433601
Reply addressees: @readomain
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056912582781665282
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable โ we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056912582781665282
-
MASCULINE VS FEMININE by Joel Harvey Order vs Chaos Justice vs Mercy Competition
MASCULINE VS FEMININE
by Joel Harvey
Order vs Chaos
Justice vs Mercy
Competition vs Cooperation
Masculine vs Feminine
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 14:14:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056912115896934400
-
MASCULINE VS FEMININE by Joel Harvey Order vs Chaos Justice vs Mercy Competition
MASCULINE VS FEMININE
by Joel Harvey
Order vs Chaos
Justice vs Mercy
Competition vs Cooperation
Masculine vs Feminine
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-29 10:14:00 UTC
-
We All Stand on The Shoulders of Others
October 28th, 2018 9:06 AM DON’T SELL YOURSELF SHORT. WE ALL STAND ON THE SHOULDERS OF OTHERS WHO DID WORK ON OUR BEHALF
—“Great another video of me realizing Iรขยยm a god damn chimp”— Nick Mallar
[D]on’t sell yourself short. I’m radical outlier who has spent a lot of time – a lifetime – learning how to understand and explain these ideas. Most of us can’t afford it, and lack the ability to focus on a single process for that length of time. As Einstein said, it’s not that he was exceptionally smart, but that he just spent more time on the problem than anyone else. IMO i’m the beneficiary of a point in time where we desperately need a solution to current intellectual problems, and a lot of people have done a lot of work I depend upon, and I have the internet and search engines making me and my generation the first people to be able to synthesize that much information from so many different fields. if you can UNDERSTAND what I’m saying, then you are no chimp at all. There is no need for you to duplicate my efforts. Just USE THE RESULT. (Now for the people that DONT understand what I’m saying, we just have to limit the damage that they can do to the rest of us. ๐ )
-
The reward for trust is discounts on cooperation and there is NOTHING that produ
The reward for trust is discounts on cooperation and there is NOTHING that produces higher returns than a network of cooperation (division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, negotiation, and advocacy.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-27 20:19:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1056279147075514368
Reply addressees: @ShardGooner @DegenRolf
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054744614056407042
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable โ we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1054744614056407042