“You don’t need techology to solve liberal censorship online. You need a spine and a community of people who cherish liberty.”-AT
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 14:26:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059089489681940480
“You don’t need techology to solve liberal censorship online. You need a spine and a community of people who cherish liberty.”-AT
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 14:26:25 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1059089489681940480
THE SCALES OF THE SACRED.
by Bill Joslin
—“Our people are the most sacred thing we have left”—Adrienne Barbeau-Bot
CONSTRUCTION
The Immediate, The Temporal. : familial, family and kin. Kin is sacred.
The intermediate: The Intertemporal. Tribal. Those families which share norms, traditions and culture. Culture, traditions and norms are sacred.
Intergenerational: national.
The accumulated social and common capital generated by kin and tribe. The commons en toto . The property we create together over generations via shared norms, traditions and culture intended for our future kin. The commons are sacred.
Ancestor worship, hero (tribal archetypes) worship preserves the sacred across scale and time horizons.
DESTRUCTION
The dissolution of “tribe” resulting from universalism of enlightenment values (values reified out from within their natural limits), segregated commons from tribal and kin ownership, resulting in rampant consumption of commons. This paving the way for globalism where economics are sacred at the cost of kin, tribe, commons.
Monotheism destroyed the operationally sacred in the name of universalism and the ideally sacred. This solidified the opportunity for parasitism of the commons, kin and tribe.
RECONSTRUCTION
Our people truly, operationally, and biologically are the most sacred upon which all other value depends.
(CD: I can edit this for a little more analytic clarity but basically bill has done a great job of it, and I’m gonna run with the ‘my people are sacred’ as a religion message.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 12:57:00 UTC
—“The more we trust the angrier we get when that trust is broken.”—Noah J Revoy
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-04 09:43:00 UTC
( no need for retaliatory words. just win. we need to win. The left doesn’t eat their own. We do. and we shouldn’t.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-03 00:31:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058516887150215168
Reply addressees: @getongab
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058515115450880000
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058515115450880000
The reason we require free speech: negotiation on trades. Because …. Ergo, free speech is the safest possible solution to achieving negotiated settlement.
@getongab https://t.co/dOKe6J7ZvG

Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 23:01:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058494395958345728
WILL YOU ACT?
Europeans built the only high trust labor, working, middle, and upper middle classes in the world. The american experiment was an attempt to give the high trust classes their own government without the church or state parasites of all of history. The left’s objective has been to hollow out that high trust middle class and produce another small upper class and vast governable underclass. And it’s been working.
The only question is whether you will join with others to do something in order to change it, and reverse the conquest of the THIRD WAY.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-02 08:57:00 UTC
^ And so, what they will do, is push youth back and the old into simple jobs at the bottom and top, rather than bring in immigrants and destroy their social cohesion as we have here in the west. And as the labor pool continues to expand but the work Contract, they will win.
Source date (UTC): 2018-11-01 22:05:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058117956704653313
Reply addressees: @zimlor1 @jeffhauser
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058115003671293952
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1058115003671293952
October 31st, 2018 9:47 AM [U]nder nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of kinship domestication, rule, management, and evolution are under each of our controls – and as such we are all equal. Under globalism we merey restore the barbarism, tribalism of the middle east, and export those costs upon one another, and in doing so make us universal enemies rather than universal allies. We are all equal only in conflict and poverty.
October 31st, 2018 9:47 AM [U]nder nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of kinship domestication, rule, management, and evolution are under each of our controls – and as such we are all equal. Under globalism we merey restore the barbarism, tribalism of the middle east, and export those costs upon one another, and in doing so make us universal enemies rather than universal allies. We are all equal only in conflict and poverty.
Under nationalism we love one another despite our differences because costs of kinship domestication, rule, management, and evolution are under each of our controls – and as such we are all equal.
Under globalism we merey restore the barbarism, tribalism of the middle east, and export those costs upon one another, and in doing so make us universal enemies rather than universal allies. We are all equal only in conflict and poverty.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-31 09:47:00 UTC