Theme: Cooperation

  • in the language eviden in the universe: the physical, natural, an evolutionary l

    … in the language eviden in the universe: the physical, natural, an evolutionary laws, and we must trade respect for one another’s thoughts under the law, and continue the tradition of tri-functionalism, war, law, and faith, with our differences only in priority. …


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 01:25:40 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254220063533654018

    Reply addressees: @themadtaer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254219662247833601


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @themadtaer No. It is that the faithful need faith, and the rational need reason, and that while we disagree on the narrative (theological rational, scientific) we agree on means (behavior) and ends. I cannot legislate either belief or unbelief, as such, the law must be written …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1254219662247833601

  • No. It is that the faithful need faith, and the rational need reason, and that w

    No. It is that the faithful need faith, and the rational need reason, and that while we disagree on the narrative (theological rational, scientific) we agree on means (behavior) and ends. I cannot legislate either belief or unbelief, as such, the law must be written …


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 01:24:04 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254219662247833601

    Reply addressees: @themadtaer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254213905024458752

  • Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not

    Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not. https://propertarianism.com/2020/04/24/cooperation-is-only-preferable-until-it-is-not/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-24 22:59:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1253820836244529157

  • Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not.

    White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation.”

  • Cooperation Is only Preferable until It Is Not.

    White law is slightly different: “Cooperation requires reciprocity. Cooperation is preferable. But it is only preferable until it is not. When it is not then conquest and eradication are preferable to cooperation.”

  • The West: The Perfect Equilibrium

    THE WEST: THE PERFECT EQUILIBRIUM

    1. In European Trifunctionalism, The Military(Aristocracy), Judicial(Burghers), and Faithful(Family) are Loyal to one another.
    2. Each is competitor in a triumvirate of military(war), law, and faith.

    3. There is no place for law in war or faith, only in resolving disputes between them.

    4. There is no place for faith in law or war, only in consolation because of them.

    5. There is no place for war in law or faith, only in our defense of them.

    6. This is our civilization; this has been our civilization for 5000 years.

    7. The dominant male, the ascendant male, and the female and her brood.

    Together we defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and the Red Queen.

  • The West: The Perfect Equilibrium

    THE WEST: THE PERFECT EQUILIBRIUM

    1. In European Trifunctionalism, The Military(Aristocracy), Judicial(Burghers), and Faithful(Family) are Loyal to one another.
    2. Each is competitor in a triumvirate of military(war), law, and faith.

    3. There is no place for law in war or faith, only in resolving disputes between them.

    4. There is no place for faith in law or war, only in consolation because of them.

    5. There is no place for war in law or faith, only in our defense of them.

    6. This is our civilization; this has been our civilization for 5000 years.

    7. The dominant male, the ascendant male, and the female and her brood.

    Together we defeat the dark forces of time, ignorance, and the Red Queen.

  • The Judgement of The Law – on The Left

    1. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than non-cooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.
    2. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests

    3. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.

    4. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.

    5. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.

    6. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.

    7. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).

    8. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit.

    9. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:

    (a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.

    (b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.

    (c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civlization at every level. Monopoly statism to undermine our tripartism. Atheism to undermine our tripartism. Anti-militarism to undermine our tripartism. Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes. Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes. Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts. Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences. Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimu for the production of high trust citizenry; and again,postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible. Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability. Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly. Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history. Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions. Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders. That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes. JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, in violation of the Westphalian peace. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.

  • The Judgement of The Law – on The Left

    1. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than non-cooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.
    2. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests

    3. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.

    4. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.

    5. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.

    6. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.

    7. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).

    8. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit.

    9. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:

    (a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.

    (b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.

    (c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civlization at every level. Monopoly statism to undermine our tripartism. Atheism to undermine our tripartism. Anti-militarism to undermine our tripartism. Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes. Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes. Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts. Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences. Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimu for the production of high trust citizenry; and again,postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible. Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability. Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly. Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history. Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions. Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders. That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes. JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, in violation of the Westphalian peace. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.

  • Why South America?

    WHY SOUTH AMERICA? 1. Population of natives and slaves. 2. christianity => increase trust to increase cooperation. 3. church => will to power by the weak. 4. church => high rates of reproduction, mysticism to govern them and anti-empiricism and anti-meritocracy to maintain control over them. 5. high rates of reproduction => underclass poverty 6. vast underclass poverty => demand for socialism. 7. demand for socialism => demand for authority instead of rule of law. 8. lack of rule of law = lack of militia to defend against corruption under rule of law by threat of overthrow. This is the cycle of poverty, dysgenia, corruption, and stagnation under the church – a cycle only broken in northern europe by aristocratic manorialism to suppress the growth of the underclass, and the subsequent middle class restoration of trade, and the subsequent restoration of rule of law, and the subsequent wealth, and the subsequent literacy, and the subsequent break with the parasitism mysticism and dysgenia of the church, and the subsequent conquest of the world, and the subsequent industrial, scientific, technical, medical, and informational revolutions, and the subsequent dragging of mankind – kicking and screaming against the european aristocracy – out of their addiction to ignorance, superstition, hard labor, poverty, starvation, disease, suffering, child mortality, early death, tyranny, and the victimhood of nature all but hostile to life. Then the academy, which had evolved as an extension of the church to teach church dogma, shifted from mythology, theology, and the granting of indulgences to alternate history, pseudoscience, and the granting of useless diplomas under the second jewish attack on western civilization.