Theme: Cooperation

  • RELATIONSHIP WISDOM Things I know how to do that seem to work. – Be funny. – Be

    RELATIONSHIP WISDOM

    Things I know how to do that seem to work.

    – Be funny.

    – Be affectionate.

    – Be supportive constantly

    – Listen when necessary

    – Be a gentleman when necessary.

    – Make her look good to her friends.

    – Be tasteful.

    – Make money.

    – Fix things.

    – Lift heavy things.

    – Be scary when necessary.

    – Make her coffee.

    – Rub her feet.

    – Wash her hair.

    – Feed her chocolate

    – Bring flowers.

    – Buy her clothes.

    – Cook (a lot)

    – Do Laundry. Dust. Vacuum. Sew buttons etc now and then.

    Things I know I do that don’t seem to work.

    – Avoid shopping without threats of bodily harm.

    – Forget everything it’s possible to forget. (Everything)

    – Leave my clothes next to the bed.

    – Pile papers and books on my desk.

    – Forget to turn off CEO-Me

    – Forget to turn off Philosopher-Me

    – Pretend I don’t know the answer or how to do it.

    – Ignore all attempts to ‘alter my priorities’

    – Express more frustration at being interrupted.

    – Fail to ignore stupidity

    – Appreciate beautiful women now and then.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 19:01:00 UTC

  • UM. NOPE. Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity,

    UM. NOPE.

    Moral psychology is relationship regulation: moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality.

    Tage S. Rai, Alan Page Fiske

    Published in Psychological review 2011

    Genuine moral disagreement exists and is widespread. To understand such disagreement, we must examine the basic kinds of social relationships people construct across cultures and the distinct moral obligations and prohibitions these relationships entail. We extend relational models theory (Fiske, 1991) to identify 4 fundamental and distinct moral motives. Unity is the motive to care for and support the integrity of in-groups by avoiding or eliminating threats of contamination and providing aid and protection based on need or empathic compassion. Hierarchy is the motive to respect rank in social groups where superiors are entitled to deference and respect but must also lead, guide, direct, and protect subordinates. Equality is the motive for balanced, in-kind reciprocity, equal treatment, equal say, and equal opportunity. Proportionality is the motive for rewards and punishments to be proportionate to merit, benefits to be calibrated to contributions, and judgments to be based on a utilitarian calculus of costs and benefits. The 4 moral motives are universal, but cultures, ideologies, and individuals differ in where they activate these motives and how they implement them. Unlike existing theories (Haidt, 2007; Hauser, 2006; Turiel, 1983), relationship regulation theory predicts that any action, including violence, unequal treatment, and “impure” acts, may be perceived as morally correct depending on the moral motive employed and how the relevant social relationship is construed. This approach facilitates clearer understanding of moral perspectives we disagree with and provides a template for how to influence moral motives and practices in the world.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 09:24:00 UTC

  • Greece, Rome, and the British Empire are expressions of the European Group Strat

    Greece, Rome, and the British Empire are expressions of the European Group Strategy at increasing scales. They are not causes – they are consequences.

    The cause is the militia.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-02 08:01:00 UTC

  • Sometimes parents must be patient with their children; spouses must be patient w

    Sometimes parents must be patient with their children; spouses must be patient with their mates; teachers must be patient with students; executives must be patient with their employees. Because we all must ‘own’ our decisions and our status-self-image system, as well as our cognitive investment in current network of ideas, plans, and habits resists pressure to adapt – except at our own speed and on our own terms. So people must own their adaptation – because they must weigh the costs and benefits and come to own their choices. Sometimes it takes minutes, sometimes hours, sometimes months, and sometimes years. So plant seeds rather than persuade, convince, or coerce. And leave the door open. And resist the call of pride in saying “I told you so”. Instead deliver the reward of “I hoped you would.”


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 12:12:00 UTC

  • Decentralization, Separatism, Nationalism, definancialization, depoliticization,

    Decentralization, Separatism, Nationalism, definancialization, depoliticization, voluntary disassociation, restoration of our high trust polity, and all done by simply creating a market for profiting from the prosecution of falsehood and reciprocity in courts.

    Continuous superiority, by continuous velocity, by continuous agency, by the combination of sovereignty and reciprocity, truth and duty, law and jury, and markets in association, cooperation, production, reproduction, commons, and polities.

    Restoration of our group evolutionary strategy: maneuver.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-01 08:55:00 UTC

  • TO PRODUCE UNITY – WE HAVE TO TALK TO EACH POLITICAL FACTION ON THEIR TERMS I wa

    TO PRODUCE UNITY – WE HAVE TO TALK TO EACH POLITICAL FACTION ON THEIR TERMS

    I want to be able to respect different people with different intuitions, beliefs, and understandings. P-law and Nationalism and markets for polities for everyone is in everyone’s interest. Monopoly political orders are impossible and contrary to the natural right of self determination.

    We are separating the african, muslim, christian, wn/natsoc, and mainstream ‘libertarian” discussions into individual groups because we lost most of the (silent) military people due to natsoc activity.

    We must reach people on their own terms and build unity for DIFFERENT political orders under P-law: Let A Thousand Nations Bloom. And mixing muslim, christian, wn/natsoc, world government, antifa-marxist groups versus constitutionalist, civnat, social democratic, and traditional democratic groups prohibit outreach to one another.

    Until enough people understand P in each faction, comprehension, cross conversation, and collective coopartion against our united enemy of the (((financial, media, entertainment, academy))) that seeks to destry our civilizations cannot be achieved.

    Our mission is to reach everyone so that ‘separation’ is possible at the expense of the (((financial, media, entertainment, academy))) and state bureaucracy, and if separation is not possible then escalation to conflict is necessary.

    But stifling the conversation before people understand their options is counter-productive. And so the only valuable arguments or ideas are those that are in fact arguments so to speak. And all you do when you cross paradigmatic boundaries is cloud the conversation – when P-law is UNIFYING across ALL PEOPLE who wish to live their lives as they do without imposing costs upon the way of life of others by doing so.

    So understand your audience. The main feeds are mainstream (rule of law, monarchic, republican, democratic mixed economy,. Post Monopoly paradigms: Christian, Muslim, WN, NATSOC, Globalist, Antifa-Marxist content to those audiences and mainstream P-content to the mainstream audiences.

    Thanks.

    GROUPS

    Female Propertarians:

    Christian Propertarians:

    Muslim/Secular Muslim and Propertarians

    Continental African Propertarianism.

    Mainstream Propertarians (rule of law)

    Socialist and Left Propertarians

    WN/NATSOC and Propertarians


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-29 13:33:00 UTC

  • Every group has a competitive strategy. Civilizational competitive strategies ar

    Every group has a competitive strategy. Civilizational competitive strategies are ancient, dependent upon geography, military ability, technology, economy, homogeneity, competitors. The sexes have strategies, but they’re instinctual. Jews us the female strategy: undermining. https://t.co/z5lEoQk88D


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-28 11:51:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255102436630507522

    Reply addressees: @Velveteen64 @juchegang3 @RockingMrE @bitchute

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1255062391798333442

  • RT @hbdchick: the moral story of the various pandemic reactions we’re seeing is

    RT @hbdchick: the moral story of the various pandemic reactions we’re seeing is (i think, maybe) my favorite: the differences between parti…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-27 02:25:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254597617918644224

  • the problem is that christianity seems to work to produce trust and their cultur

    the problem is that christianity seems to work to produce trust and their culture doesn’t. this is the ‘hard problem’


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 23:11:09 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254548600245440514

    Reply addressees: @ekiekipatang @EricLiford

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254547422153519104

  • and together we win. Or divided we lose

    … and together we win. Or divided we lose.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-04-26 01:26:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254220300344049668

    Reply addressees: @themadtaer

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1254220063533654018


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    @themadtaer … in the language eviden in the universe: the physical, natural, an evolutionary laws, and we must trade respect for one another’s thoughts under the law, and continue the tradition of tri-functionalism, war, law, and faith, with our differences only in priority. …

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1254220063533654018